Started By
Message

State to force child to treat cancer with chemo against her wishes - UPDATE

Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:25 am
Posted by AnonymousTiger
Franklin, TN
Member since Jan 2012
4863 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:25 am
LINK


quote:

17-year-old girl Cassandra believes that the state cannot make her undergo potentially life-saving chemotherapy. The state, however, said she's too young to make that decision.

quote:

The teen's mother, Jackie Fortin of Windsor Locks, says that her daughter does not want the toxins and does not want people telling her what to do with her body.

Fortin said she wants Cassandra to beat her cancer, but believes that state should not be able to force her to undergo chemo. She said that if her daughter were a mere one year older, it'd be her own decision.

quote:

A judge recently ordered Cassandra to have the treatment, despite the family searching for other treatments and second opinions.

After two such treatments, the family said the teen ran away from home.

The Department of Children and Families stepped in and put the girl in protective custody. It said Fortin failed to give her daughter the chemo.





THE DECISION IS IN

LINK
State Supreme Court Rules Teen Can't Refuse Chemo
quote:

The state's highest court reviewed that series of events under an emergency appeal filed by lawyers for the girl and her mother, taking up an issue decided by several other states — whether some minors are mature enough to make decisions about their own bodies. On Thursday, the judges decided that Cassandra is not mature and will continue to receive chemotherapy.
This post was edited on 1/8/15 at 1:02 pm
Posted by BigDawg0420
Hamsterdam
Member since Apr 2010
7397 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:27 am to
Just give her some weed. Screw chemo
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:27 am to
frick this current government. What the frick are they even doing meddling in people's personal lives?

quote:

The Department of Children and Families stepped in and put the girl in protective custody. It said Fortin failed to give her daughter the chemo.



Good Lord. It's a 17 year old refusing treatment not a mother actively hurting an infant.
Posted by AnonymousTiger
Franklin, TN
Member since Jan 2012
4863 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:29 am to
quote:

frick this current government. What the frick are they even doing meddling in people's personal lives?


I get what you're saying, but I just want to clarify that this is a Connecticut issue and no fed involvement (yet?)
Posted by nes2010
Member since Jun 2014
6759 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:29 am to
I've know a couple of people who said they refused treatment and cured their cancer with diet changes. I assume they were telling the truth.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:30 am to
quote:

I get what you're saying, but I just want to clarify that this is a Connecticut issue


Connecticut doesn't have a government?
Posted by AnonymousTiger
Franklin, TN
Member since Jan 2012
4863 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:30 am to
The Link in the OP has a live stream of the court hearing (and it's going on right now). Pretty cool if you are a legal nerd.
Posted by AnonymousTiger
Franklin, TN
Member since Jan 2012
4863 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Connecticut doesn't have a government?


I thought you were talking about the fed gov in your first comment. My bad.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68234 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:31 am to
What type of cancer?
What's the response rate to the proposed therapy?
What are the real research-backed alternatives?
Posted by BlackleafBaller
Member since Oct 2012
1863 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:35 am to
quote:

What type of cancer? What's the response rate to the proposed therapy? What are the real research-backed alternatives?


Does any of this matter?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68234 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:37 am to
Absolutely
Posted by windmill
Prairieville, La
Member since Dec 2005
7017 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:37 am to
One would be incredible but " a couple" of people you know refused treatment for cancer and beat it with diet changes?? I gotta throw out the bs flag.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79207 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:38 am to
I was with the family until "toxins," now I'm on the fence.
Posted by nes2010
Member since Jun 2014
6759 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:41 am to
Yea, I didn't say I would refuse treatment.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68234 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:42 am to
Exactly. So she doesn't want the "toxins" because they are harmful but she has cancer. What? That's illogical, and why I asked the questions I did previously.
This post was edited on 1/8/15 at 11:43 am
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:43 am to
quote:

So she doesn't want the "toxins" because they are harmful but has cancer. 


If you had a paper cut and I wanted to stab you with a machete and you said no, I could use that same exact "logic" to stab you.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73144 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:46 am to
quote:

She said that if her daughter were a mere one year older, it'd be her own decision.
yea but she's not
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68234 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:46 am to
So, the cancer is the paper cut and the chemotherapy is the machete. Gotcha.
Posted by BuckeyeFan87
Columbus
Member since Dec 2007
25239 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:47 am to
I'm with her. Chemo is cancer.




Granted, I have no idea what I would do in that situation, but I sure as hell don't think the government should be able to force you into any specific treatment. It's not like this is some form of communicable disease.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:47 am to
quote:

yea but she's not


So the decision should be her mother's. Not the government's.

This is all kinds of fricked up. Governmental over reach.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram