Started By
Message

Best "young" QB to draft next fantasy season? (Under 28)

Posted on 12/25/14 at 8:23 am
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 12/25/14 at 8:23 am
Luck is obviously the #1 guy but then you have a slew of players who could really break out as they reach their "peak" years.

Stafford
Cam

Both have been great and not so great in fantasy football which becomes consistent?

RGIII
Tannehill

RGIII had a strong rookie season and then nothing Tannehill was serviceable this past season

Colin Kaepernick
Andy Dalton
Both have weeks that can win a game for you but more weeks that will lose a game

Geno
Bridgewater
EJ
Rookies coming in
Can we expect any to improve next year or light the league on fire in year 1?

Wilson
Emerged this season as a top 5-7 FF QB can he repeat?
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51680 posts
Posted on 12/25/14 at 8:33 am to
frick Stafford. That is all. I'd take Tannehill over him
Posted by PiscesTiger
Concrete, WA
Member since Feb 2004
53696 posts
Posted on 12/25/14 at 9:44 am to
Same. Tannehill has Wallace and Landry and a pretty good play action game with Miller. I think the Fish should draft another solid TB and a good OL and that'll make them a very likely candidate to overtake New England in the coming years. I won't say he'd be the first QB I would draft next year, but I would certainly not hesitate to grab him by round 6 if he's still out there.
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
28725 posts
Posted on 12/25/14 at 9:48 am to
Wilson or Cam
Posted by xxKylexx
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2011
4039 posts
Posted on 12/25/14 at 12:10 pm to
I will never and I mean EVER draft Matthew Stafford. I'll ride with Tannehill, Bridgewater, Carr, just so many people I would take over Stafford.
Posted by rballa19
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Oct 2009
4380 posts
Posted on 12/25/14 at 1:07 pm to
Bridgewater has been pretty consistent and not that bad this year. They need help at WR, but he could definitely be someone who will average around 17-20 points a week.
Posted by tigersint
Lafayette
Member since Nov 2012
3548 posts
Posted on 12/25/14 at 9:16 pm to
If AP goes back to the Vikings I think that it hurts bridgewaters stock
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17715 posts
Posted on 12/25/14 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

frick Stafford. That is all. I'd take Tannehill over him


Stafford woulda be a nice play, but you have to blame Calvin missing all that time.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51680 posts
Posted on 12/25/14 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

Stafford woulda be a nice play, but you have to blame Calvin missing all that time.


A good QB doesn't need the talent around him to be good. See Brady.
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17715 posts
Posted on 12/25/14 at 10:04 pm to
Gronk and Edelman ain't talent?
Posted by easy money
Member since Feb 2005
14420 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 9:18 am to
Wilson, Tannehill, Bridgewater look like good picks.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112335 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 10:19 am to
quote:

and a good OL and that'll make them a very likely candidate to overtake New England in the coming years


Not with Philbin as the head coach
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11165 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 10:19 am to
Its Wilson, especially if Lynch relocates after this year, then the whole offense will run through Wilson.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112335 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Its Wilson, especially if Lynch relocates after this year, then the whole offense will run through Wilson.


And that's when Wilson gets exposed like Kapernick has.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 10:26 am to
Wilson is a better passer, more accurate
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112335 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Wilson is a better passer, more accurate


He's woefully overrated as a passer. He's got better touch than Kap, but his accuracy can be iffy when the linebackers are sucked up so deep trying to stop lynch
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 12:22 pm to
Wilson doesn't have the arm strength to go deep but the short west coast type offense he will complete 60+ percent of his passes. Seattle doesn't have the best receivers and that will hurt him next season with Lynch gone
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72028 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Wilson doesn't have the arm strength to go deep




one of the strongest arms in the league
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51680 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Gronk and Edelman ain't talent? 


Edelman is a product of that system.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 2:40 pm to
Really wouldn't have guessed that based on the games I've seen, may be play calling though because he hardly ever goes deep. I still wouldn't put him in "strongest" though.....
Flacco
Rivers
Stafford
Kaerpernick
Newton
Tannehill
Rodgers
Big Ben
Rivers
Cutler
Maybe someone im missing whose an obvious choice as well
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram