- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Has Sarah Palin been blamed for any of this yet?
Posted on 12/22/14 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 12/22/14 at 1:32 pm
Remember how the left wanted a national conversation about rhetoric and guns after Gabby Giffords was shot and how they all blamed Sarah Palin for it?
Why are they not demanding a national dialogue/conversation about violent rhetoric toward law enforcement right now?
Why are they not demanding a national dialogue/conversation about violent rhetoric toward law enforcement right now?
7
Posted on 12/22/14 at 1:33 pm to goldennugget
She got old and not hot. Nobody cares about her.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 1:33 pm to goldennugget
Because you're an internet weirdo.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 1:34 pm to goldennugget
Start with this conversation topic: "Gun control for lefties".
Posted on 12/22/14 at 1:34 pm to FT
No, even Tea Baggers have accepted that she is irrelevant.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 1:35 pm to Texas_Boss
I blame her for not being able to see Russia from my house... you know because of what she said and all...
Posted on 12/22/14 at 1:36 pm to goldennugget
Wow. Another gem of a post from you.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 1:53 pm to Texas_Boss
quote:
No, even Tea Baggers have accepted that she is irrelevant.
Carol Costello disagrees
Posted on 12/22/14 at 1:55 pm to Texas_Boss
quote:
No, even Tea Baggers have accepted that she is irrelevant.
Such an adult response.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 2:02 pm to goldennugget
It wouldn't fit the narrative of minority victimhood.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 2:07 pm to goldennugget
Whatever happened with your job from the OT thread you made last week?
Posted on 12/22/14 at 2:14 pm to goldennugget
you remain the worst poster on this site.
Congrats.
Congrats.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 2:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:What's wrong with "Tea Baggers?" In 2009, members of the Tea Party sent tea bags to the White House in protest of President Obama's stimulus package. Do you take it to mean something else?
quote:
No, even Tea Baggers have accepted that she is irrelevant.
Such an adult response.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 2:17 pm to asurob1
quote:
you remain the worst poster on this site. Congrats.
Let's not get carried away. SECrazy says hi.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 2:18 pm to ballscaster
quote:
What's wrong with "Tea Baggers?" In 2009, members of the Tea Party sent tea bags to the White House in protest of President Obama's stimulus package. Do you take it to mean something else?
You aren't that stupid. I hope.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 2:20 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Calling a member of the Tea Party a Teabagger is correct according to Oxford, whose definition refers to the White House tea bags I mentioned in my previous post. Do you choose to take it to mean something else?
Posted on 12/22/14 at 2:23 pm to ballscaster
quote:
Calling a member of the Tea Party a Teabagger is correct according to Oxford, whose definition refers to the White House tea bags I mentioned in my previous post. Do you choose to take it to mean something else?
The slang use of teabagger is a derogatory term used by those who oppose the various T.P. groups. If you'd like some history of the use of the term, I can gladly assist you. I don't believe you do though, you're just being obstinate.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 2:30 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:No, I'm calling you out on your hypocrisy. A person said "Teabaggers" in reference to members of the Tea Party. This reference is inherently non-vulgar. It appears, I would guess, that something vulgar came to mind when you saw the word, and you scolded the person on what you implied to be his reproachable level of maturity, when in fact, you yourself, by virtue of having thought, I would assume, of a sexual act when seeing that word, are firmly at that same level of maturity that you criticize.
you're just being obstinate.
Furthermore, your screen name on this site, RogerTheShrubber, is one of my favorites on here. I applaud you, by the way. It is a reference to a film that includes, among other things, many satirical references to sexual acts that are no more or less mature than the idea of calling a political opponent a person who likes to have testicles dropped into his mouth.
Was the person immature for calling Tea Party members Teabaggers? Perhaps. But no less mature than you or I.
I love you, but I feel the need to see other people.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 2:31 pm to ballscaster
quote:
No, I'm calling you out on your hypocrisy.
Another word that apparently has lost all meaning.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 2:32 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Fine. How about "false sanctimony?" fricking teabagger.
ETA: I take that back. It definitely is hypocrisy, according to definition #1 on dictionary.com:
ETA: I take that back. It definitely is hypocrisy, according to definition #1 on dictionary.com:
quote:You pretended to be above the slang use of a term which was used literally correctly. The slang use of the term was inferred by you, meaning you do not actually possess or follow the principles implied by "What a mature response" or "How mature of you."
a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles, etc., that one does not really possess.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 2:36 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News