Started By
Message

What do you think about AR and AK pistols with arm braces?

Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:48 pm
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38725 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:48 pm
Something like this... I can't decide if they are "skrait gangsta" or a classic example of American ingenuity.








Posted by Bama and Beer
Baldwin Co, AL
Member since Oct 2010
80869 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:50 pm to
Stupid as frick
Posted by tiddlesmcdiddles
Lafayette, LA
Member since Apr 2013
1719 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:53 pm to
most mind blowing loop hole too date. even more so than the bump fire stocks.

i still think they look kinda dumb though
Posted by A_bear
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2013
1960 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:55 pm to
I hate AK's in general so I think they're shite no matter what you do to it. The AR with the arm brace is pretty badass just for target shooting and what not but useless for anything else.
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

What do you think about AR and AK pistols
i am confused by this sentence. Could you elaborate?
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38725 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

i am confused by this sentence. Could you elaborate?


What do you think? Are they legit? Cool? Stupid?

What do you think about the obvious loophole? It's basically a SBR (short barrel rifle)...
Posted by tiddlesmcdiddles
Lafayette, LA
Member since Apr 2013
1719 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:01 pm to
that "stock" pictured in the OP is actually a brace. a fricking arm brace. this makes it legal to put on to a "pistol" (AR or AK) so you can have a barrel shorter than 16"

once it is sold, the ATF cannot regulate its use, so you can shoulder it just like a normal stock…but its a brace…mmk?
Posted by northern
Member since Jan 2014
1360 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:04 pm to
With the Sig Brace running ~ $150, why not just pay the $200 for the tax stamp and not have to worry when the ATF changes their mind on the legality of the brace?
Posted by 99DSTJ
K-Town
Member since Jun 2009
782 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:08 pm to
Pretty great for a truck gun IMO.
Posted by oleyeller
Vols, Bitch
Member since Oct 2012
32015 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:10 pm to
i could totally see you rocking one of these while wearing old school camo while drinking a tall boy
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

that "stock" pictured in the OP is actually a brace. a fricking arm brace. this makes it legal to put on to a "pistol" (AR or AK) so you can have a barrel shorter than 16"

once it is sold, the ATF cannot regulate its use, so you can shoulder it just like a normal stock…but its a brace…mmk?


i still don't understand. Are you saying those two guns shoot 5.56 and 7.62 but are not considered AK's and AR's? they look like them,just a little shorter. What is exactly "pistol " about them?
Posted by 99DSTJ
K-Town
Member since Jun 2009
782 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:20 pm to
They are not considered rifles because of barrel length and are not sold with a stock.
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
13848 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:20 pm to
Pain in the arse to aim - you either need your arm straight out, or have to stand sideways.
Don't expect to hit anything past 50 yards

quote:

Regardless of the strap though it just did not feel quite right. You really need to turn the gun sideways to aim it right and it does not relieve much weight. It is quite difficult to hold steady as well, and even my buddy CJ agreed (and he is a much bigger man than I).








This post was edited on 12/18/14 at 2:28 pm
Posted by tiddlesmcdiddles
Lafayette, LA
Member since Apr 2013
1719 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:22 pm to
this is an AK pistol. it is a pistol because it does not have a shoulder stock, so the barrel length can be less than 16". if you put that brace in the OP on it, you have essentially built an SBR (short barreled rifle) because you can use the brace as a shoulder stock (legally) without having to go through the ATF and filling out a Form 5320.1 (Form 1) to "build" an SBR.



essentially the same thing can be said/done for the AR pistol as well, but because of the AR design, which has a reciprocating buffer and assembly that protrudes from the rear of the receiver, in the past AR Pistols have been less desirable because they are difficult to shoulder comfortably. the Sig Brace eliminates the "tube in the shoulder" issue.

AR Pistol (before the sig brace)

Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

They are not considered rifles because of barrel length and are not sold with a stock.


ok so what's the advantage of owning something that isn't considered a rifle? I don't get the appeal or reasoning behind it.
Posted by northern
Member since Jan 2014
1360 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

What is exactly "pistol " about them?


This is an AR pistol without the brace:


This is an AK pistol without the brace:


Without getting into all the specific legal definitions, these firearms have a barrel less than 16 inches and/or an overall length of less than 26 inches. If you were to put a traditional stock on them they would no longer qualify as a pistol and would be required to register as an SBR.

EDIT: tiddlesmcdiddles beat me to it
This post was edited on 12/18/14 at 2:24 pm
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

filling out a Form 5320.1 (Form 1) to "build" an SBR.
ok.Kinda makes sense now but i still don't see why anyone would purposely want a SBR unless it's the pitbull owner types that just want it for show.
Posted by northern
Member since Jan 2014
1360 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

why anyone would purposely want a SBR


Easier maneuverability in tight quarters, light weight, you can add a suppressor without dramatically increasing the overall length over that of a regular rifle, to name a few.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65043 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:29 pm to
Look, someone who has never been in close quarter combat.
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38725 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

ok so what's the advantage of owning something that isn't considered a rifle?


Rifles have a minimum barrel length requirement. Pistols do not. Because technically it's a pistol, you can add the "arm brace".

Legal: (Nothing additional required to own one)



Illegal: (Without additional tax and paperwork)



Essentially it's the same thing, you're just not allowed to "shoulder" the arm brace legally.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram