Started By
Message

re: Getting Fired for Facebook Posts

Posted on 12/17/14 at 2:57 pm to
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105414 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 2:57 pm to
We had an employee get called in for remarks on her FB page that were pretty damaging to her. She was talking trash about co workers and the company. She was on her 90 day probation. She wasn't fired bit the damage was done. She quit three days later
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18084 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 2:57 pm to
That's it.

This is the actual comment.

LINK
This post was edited on 12/17/14 at 2:58 pm
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18645 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

correct, but only in certain right-to-work states



myth, right-to-work has nothing to do with it
Posted by TheBoo
South to Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
4516 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 2:58 pm to
tl;dr, but responding solely to your subject, witnessed someone get fired a few days after being hired because said person's facebook page had some pretty racy photos on it.

So it do happen.
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58354 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 2:58 pm to
Figured this was already addressed.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
57490 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

When did we get here as a society?



People have always been stupid, now they just have the means to share their dumbass thoughts with the world
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
53835 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

When did we get here as a society?


Gradual progression over time. It isn't like all the Liberals have been voted into office because people don't agree with them.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

November 2008

Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
15843 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Since when is an employee given a right to free speech?


Everyone is given the right of free speech. The employee did not get arrested, or detained or had any government related actions denied him.

He spoke freely. That is all the Constitution grants. His employer is free to exterminate him based on his utter stupidity. That is not protected by the Constitution.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61271 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 3:00 pm to
Portland Community college

Works as a Sales Rep at Nordstrom???? LOL




This post was edited on 12/17/14 at 3:01 pm
Posted by AnonymousTiger
Franklin, TN
Member since Jan 2012
4863 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

myth, right-to-work has nothing to do with it


Well, actually, in right to work states the law will presume you are an at will employee unless you can prove you're not. So, it does have something to do with it.
This post was edited on 12/17/14 at 3:02 pm
Posted by taylork37
Member since Mar 2010
15327 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Portland Community college

Works as a Sales Rep at Nordstrom???? LOL




I don't see what is that crazy.
This post was edited on 12/17/14 at 3:03 pm
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18084 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Works as a Sales Rep at Nordstrom???? LOL



Low level employee, yes.

The tone of the story was about possible legal recourse for the employee, it was his personal views, etc. where I would think most people would say that the idiot got what he deserved.

Posted by arseinclarse
Algiers Purnt
Member since Apr 2007
34412 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Since when is an employee given a right to free speech?


Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18645 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Well, actually, in right to work states the law will presume you are an at will employee unless you can prove you're not. So, it does have something to do with it.



Two different sets of law.
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
24929 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

for some reason I was under the assumption that an employer can fire an employee at any time or place with no reason or any reason and thats ok.

They might have to pay unemployment checks until they got a job or whatever but it's not illegal.

am i mistaken?


Not entirely accurate. Cannot fire an employee based on the employee's race, sex, religion, and other statutorily protected categories. These categories are growing every year too. That would be illegal and the employee could be entitled to significant compensatory and even punitive damages (and in some circumstances reinstatement, although that rarely happens).

It's more accurate to say an employer can fire an employee for any reason or no reason at all (even if it's completely arbitrary or unfair) so long as the reason is not forbidden by statute.
Posted by ZereauxSum
Lot 23E
Member since Nov 2008
10176 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Of course he's threatening to sue, his right to free speech was violated, etc. And some attorney is going to take this case and now it seems that he will be able to raise money on a GoFundme page or something. He may be rewarded with a payday that will probably be more than this guy's total lifetime earning potential.

When did we get here as a society?


Meh. You're making a lot of assumptions.

If this guy lives in a right to work state, his employer and any court will politely tell him to GFH.

Even if it does go to trial, he still has to win and some jury has to award him damages.

I think society is mostly fine.
Posted by ragacamps
Member since Jan 2011
2997 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 3:06 pm to
November 2008
Posted by taylork37
Member since Mar 2010
15327 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Meh. You're making a lot of assumptions.


Yeah it sounds like the reaction on twitter and at least people on the video aren't too upset about him being fired. Small sample tho.
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
24929 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Well, actually, in right to work states the law will presume you are an at will employee unless you can prove you're not. So, it does have something to do with it.



In technical legal terms, "right-to-work" has to do with whether a union can force you to join/pay union dues to work at a company with which they have a collective bargaining agreement or whether you can opt out. It doesn't have anything to do with "at-will" employment.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram