Started By
Message

re: Rolling over 401K to new job

Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:08 am to
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Read my post again. I said 401ks offer full bankruptcy protection, not IRAs.


I believe he is making the point that IRAs are also protected during bankruptcy, albeit up to a certain amount.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65045 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:14 am to
quote:

I believe he is making the point that IRAs are also protected during bankruptcy, albeit up to a certain amount.



Under the OP scenario the entire thing would be protected.

But of course I'm wrong. Apologies to everyone.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65045 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:16 am to
quote:

You've been wrong now several times.



False
Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3643 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Under the OP scenario the entire thing would be protected.


Sure his small balance in 2014 would be protected, but what happens in 2045 when that number has grown outside the protection limit?

quote:

quote:
You've been wrong now several times.


False



quote:

No they don't. You're a liar. I've never seen one company plan that will let me invest into 20 different equities of my choice.



My current plan is one. Another poster on page 2 has now said his offers this option.

quote:

quote:
ETA: Ever looked at a Roth balance vs a traditional IRA balance after 20-30 yrs?


Of course I have. I've been doing this for a living for 20 years. And fyi, the balances are exactly the same. Taxability is another matter entirely.



If he pays taxes on the money in the Roth conversion, the balances (in your definition) will most certainly not be the same.

quote:

quote:
401k loans offer 2 indisputable advantages, ability to borrow against, and full protection from bankruptcy.


I can't tell you how many times I've seen an IRA snatched away from a person in the event of bankruptcy.


Your statement is true, IRAs are bankruptable under certain conditions, but which is why I said that 401ks are fully protected, not IRAs.

These are some examples where you've been wrong. Which is why the OP should take all this information and do his own research.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65045 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:42 am to
You're right. Me and the other 2 financial planners here are wrong. We are pretty much wrong about everything. I just say shite out of my arse because I was working at Wendy's before I got this job. I'll defer all future financial discussion to the pipe fitter from the fine state of Alabama.

I'm kidding about the pipe fitter. I 100% know you are an engineer. Because only engineers are this hard headed and right about everything.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65045 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:44 am to
quote:

If he pays taxes on the money in the Roth conversion, the balances (in your definition) will most certainly not be the same.


Good God almighty. You know the shite that shows up in his bank when he takes a distribution isn't called "THE BALANCE" right?
Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3643 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:46 am to
Yes, and they would clearly be different. Do you still dispute this?
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65045 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Yes, and they would clearly be different. Do you still dispute this?


I absolutely dispute it
Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3643 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:50 am to
Ok, please elaborate.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65045 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:50 am to
So let's do a calculation.

$20,000, 5% compounded annually for 30 years.

If he rolls into a trad/401k he ends up with $86,438.85


If he rolls into a Roth and pays the tax out of pocket he ends up with $86,438.85

If he uses the balance and his tax bracket is 15% he ends up with:

$73,473.02

Which is what I've been saying all along. You want to throw taxation into a discussion about balance. And you're wrong.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65045 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:52 am to
Your quote:

quote:

ETA: Ever looked at a Roth balance vs a traditional IRA balance after 20-30 yrs?
Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3643 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

If he rolls into a Roth and pays the tax out of pocket he ends up with $86,438.85


He pays the tax when he rolls into the Roth, which is right now. So he doesn't have $20,000 anymore, and won't end up with $86,438.85. I know you are aware of this.

I don't know why you made the comment earlier about taxation being "another matter" when it's central to the choice of what to do with the money. Maybe the confusion has arisen from you taking my use of "balance" in that post and interpreting it outside of the thread.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65045 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

He pays the tax when he rolls into the Roth, which is right now. So he doesn't have $20,000 anymore


I gave both scenarios actually. You implied that the Roth balance would be higher, when in fact, it would be lower.

quote:

Maybe the confusion has arisen from you taking my use of "balance" in that post and interpreting it outside of the thread.


Or maybe it's because you used "balance" in a way that no person who has a brokerage account would ever use it. "Broke, what's my balance?". You get $1,800 a month into your bank account". "I asked you what my balance was". "OHHHHHHHHHH, that's $942,499"

I go by what a man writes, not what he wants it to mean. You don't call a bank for a balance and they tell you how much money you pulled out yesterday.

The Roth distributions may indeed be more beneficial but as I stated before, I don't have enough information to make that call.

Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3643 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:12 pm to
I think you have reading comprehension problems, on top of being an a-hole. So I'm done with this discussion. Merry Christmas
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65045 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

on top of being an a-hole


I would put this first if I were you.

You have a lovely day Sigma.





*I'm kind of tired of arguing about this actually.
Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3643 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

*I'm kind of tired of arguing about this actually.


Me too. Thanks for the info about the lot sloping. We should hear something soon.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65045 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:28 pm to
You're going to have no issues there but you might, might be able to squeeze him for a few bucks out of this. But make sure there isn't another buyer that could slide in and snake you guys. That would be a really shitty Christmas
Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3643 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

You're going to have no issues there but you might, might be able to squeeze him for a few bucks out of this. But make sure there isn't another buyer that could slide in and snake you guys. That would be a really shitty Christmas


Fortunately, like you said, we have a contract. We might push a hair, but probably will just let it ride. The guy wouldn't budge on the price up front, so I doubt we'd get any traction anyway. We love the property too much to jeopardize the sale over something like this.

But this is our first time buying property like this, so I thought I'd check first. Chicken really should start charging for access. You guys are a lot cheaper than an attorney

But about that rollover...
Posted by Nativebullet
Natchez, MS
Member since Feb 2011
5134 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:12 pm to
I agree with Sigma. I'm not an engineer or financial planner... I've work at Florsheim Shoes at the mall for 19 years now and have save a nice little $$$$ egg. I read Money magazine too.

This post was edited on 12/18/14 at 1:19 pm
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34885 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Anyone who thinks it's better to roll into the new 401k vs. an IRA needs to be questioned hard before listening to.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram