Started By
Message
locked post

Dillard President wants to end tops for a lot of Louisiana students......

Posted on 12/16/14 at 9:47 am
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28340 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 9:47 am
What a pile of self serving crap.

quote:

Sadly, TOPS is more of an engine of inequality than it is of opportunity.


quote:

TOPS rewards students based on the family they were born into rather than the need for an opportunity to attend college. I can’t fathom why we refuse to acknowledge decades of data proving standardized test scores are best correlated by family income.


quote:

low-income students, defined by ACT as those from families earning less than $36,000 a year, scored 17 to 20 points below the all-student average in each area.


quote:

The report also shows that high-income students take core curriculum classes at a greater rate than low-income students


quote:

TOPS is structured to give money to top students, from top-income families, who attend top schools with top curriculums. The state has spent almost $2 billion on a program that exacerbates income inequality and limits financial assistance to those who need it the most.


quote:

Cap the income level of families that are eligible for TOPS ($60,000), lower the ACT score and raise the grade-point average


So we can turn all of the state schools into places like SUNO/Dillard where the state warehouses a bunch of folks who shouldn't be in college to begin with?


LINK
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 9:50 am to
Too. Much. Stupid.
Posted by waiting4saturday
Covington, LA
Member since Sep 2005
9720 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 9:51 am to
She mad her people don't care about education.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101390 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 9:51 am to
quote:

lower the ACT score


Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98775 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Cap the income level of families that are eligible for TOPS ($60,000), lower the ACT score and raise the grade-point average




Holy shite...that's a lot of dumb in just one sentence.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:01 am to
Given the low standards, should anyone who does not qualify for TOPS be in college to begin with?
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:02 am to
quote:

Every year, students drop out due to lack of money, sometimes as little as a few hundred dollars.

Yeah, lack of available funding is the cause of Dillard's 30% graduation rate. It's not like anyone can just go get a student loan or anything. Oh wait.

quote:

In addition, some of the funds should be directed to ensure that all schools have high-quality teachers, providing financial incentives to those teaching in the toughest situations.

Ah, there's the rub. Scumbag wants more money to pump into his failing, bottom-tier school. What an embarrassing article coming from a University President.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37093 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:02 am to
I posted this link on my FB page this morning and this is what I wrote along with it:

So you actually have a college president actively calling for LESS students to get financial aid. Bizarro world!!

Look, it's obvious there is a link between income levels and student performance. But this doesn't fix the problem. TOPS isn't that hard to get. Putting an income max on the scholarship will simply result in smarter students getting scholarships to attend school out of state (because our in-state schools are poorly funded and probably can't take on the additional scholarship burden). Lowering the standards to get TOPS may result in more poor students getting to go to college, but will they actually be able to be successful? Again, the current standards for TOPS isn't that hard.

Maybe this president instead needs to focus on the issue with poor students and performance at the elementary and HS school level, and try to figure out how to fix that problem. That will be how he can best help poor students. If we can get poor students to perform better in K-12 education, TOPS will be there for them.
Posted by LeonPhelps
Member since May 2008
8185 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:03 am to
quote:

I can’t fathom why we refuse to acknowledge decades of data proving standardized test scores are best correlated by family income.


Could it be, I don't know, that you are more likely to make more money if you are smarter?

Yet another person who misses the entire point of TOPS - to keep the best and brightest in Louisiana. That is why it is merit-based.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37093 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Scumbag wants more money to pump into his failing, bottom-tier school.


It's a private school, just tuition for a semester is $7,519.

Admission standards for Dillard: 2.5 GPA, 18 ACT

So if he can get the ACT score for TOPS down to an 18, he can get the state to pay for part of the tuition for his minimum students.

Taking public money and using it for private education... hmmm... I wonder what this guy's stance is on K-12 vouchers.
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28340 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Cap the income level of families that are eligible for TOPS ($60,000), lower the ACT score and raise the grade-point average


To do this would completely undermine the reason why ACT score is important to begin with......you have dummies in some of these ridiculously bad schools getting high GPA's...due to less rigorous academic standards. The ACT score is a large component of keeping everyone on a level playing field.
Posted by Tigerstudent08
Lakeview
Member since Apr 2007
5776 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:12 am to
quote:

So you actually have a college president actively calling for LESS students to get financial aid. Bizarro world!!

This is only partially true. He wants less "wealthy" families receiving financial aid and he wants even more "poor" families to receive financial aid, no matte whether they deserve it or not (see where he wants to lower ACT requirements for those students). This guy is a joke. Goes to show you why that school is such a failure.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41187 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:13 am to
quote:

low-income students, defined by ACT as those from families earning less than $36,000 a year, scored 17 to 20 points below the all-student average in each area.


quote:


State- Louisiana
Average Composite Score 20.3
Average English Score 20.4
Average Math Score 19.9
Average Reading Score 20.4


so they score between a 0-3 on the ACT?


Posted by Jim Ignatowski
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
1383 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:18 am to
TOPS was NEVER supposed to be need based.....NEVER.

There are MULTITUDES of programs that are need based and there has been for many decades.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37093 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:21 am to
quote:

you have dummies in some of these ridiculously bad schools getting high GPA's...due to less rigorous academic standards. The ACT score is a large component of keeping everyone on a level playing field.



Remember how we got high stakes testing and all the school accountability stuff? During the Foster administration, there were a bunch of stories in the Times-Picayune (back when it was actually a decent newspaper) regarding NOLA public school valedictorians who had like 3.9 GPAs, and were getting scores on the ACT in the 12-13 range, and needed remedial classes in college and eventually flunked out. It was obvious that the grades being handed out, and diplomas being handed out, were an absolute joke.

There was a ton of public pressure and the Legislature and Foster and BESE created the accountability program, re-did the LEAP and GEE tests (the GEE especially was insanely easy and you only needed a 50 percent score to pass) and tied the test results to promotion.

And ever since then, certain people in certain communities have been trying to roll back those standards, under the guise of "it's not fair to poor people."

This is just the latest example.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112469 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:25 am to
quote:

TOPS is structured to give money to top students, from top-income families, who attend top schools with top curriculums.


TOPS was created long after I was finished with college so someone needs to help me out. Wasn't one of the reasons TOPS was created was to stem the out-migration of the state's brighter kids? And once out of state those students never came back to La?
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
19344 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:27 am to
quote:

low-income students, defined by ACT as those from families earning less than $36,000 a year, scored 17 to 20 points below the all-student average in each area.

Is he talking about ACT scores? If so wouldn't that mean that those people are averaging a score of below 10 on the ACT? Does he really think those are the people who need to be going to college?
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:29 am to
TOPS is a good thing. It helps keep good talent in the state.

She should be more focused on improving the quality of primary and secondary education. If those improve, then her students scores will improve as well.
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:30 am to
The school is not a failure. Tells me a lot about what you know.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101390 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:34 am to
quote:

StrongSafety


Back to back correctness from you here. Good job.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram