- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How come Republicans trust government to do only one thing?
Posted on 12/15/14 at 11:15 pm
Posted on 12/15/14 at 11:15 pm
How come Republicans trust government to do only one thing? (torture)
Posted on 12/15/14 at 11:17 pm to SpidermanTUba
What the frick.
Have a downvote.
Have a downvote.
Posted on 12/15/14 at 11:19 pm to SpidermanTUba
Be fair, they also trust the government to carry out executions of American citizens
This post was edited on 12/15/14 at 11:19 pm
Posted on 12/15/14 at 11:20 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:Um, while it's almost certainly true that most Republicans support the death penalty(as to most Democrats), many do not. IE, myself.
Be fair, they also trust the government to carry out executions of American citizens
Posted on 12/15/14 at 11:20 pm to SpidermanTUba
I'm gonna RA this thread.
Not because it is an attack, inappropriate, or anything of that nature.
I'm gonna RA it because this is the worst troll thread you've ever had.
Wow.
Not because it is an attack, inappropriate, or anything of that nature.
I'm gonna RA it because this is the worst troll thread you've ever had.
Wow.
Posted on 12/15/14 at 11:23 pm to Scruffy
Every time I think TUba has reached the absolute basement of posting, he busts out a shovel and starts digging.
Posted on 12/15/14 at 11:27 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
they also trust the government to carry out executions of American citizens
That had due process, an impartial jury and judge to decide the case, had the right to reasonably effective counsel, access to evidence and knowledge gained through discovery efforts and decades worth of automatic appeals.
Posted on 12/15/14 at 11:31 pm to SpidermanTUba
Wish they would get their republican hands on you
Posted on 12/15/14 at 11:37 pm to SpidermanTUba
frick your couch, here's a downvote
Posted on 12/15/14 at 11:59 pm to SpidermanTUba
the government that tortures least tortures best
and just wait until they send in the drones... and start blaring that loud music
and just wait until they send in the drones... and start blaring that loud music
This post was edited on 12/16/14 at 12:04 am
Posted on 12/16/14 at 12:07 am to SpidermanTUba
You ran from the other thread where I destroyed your torture premise.
The lawyers who gave the go ahead to the EIT Program, stated that torture as defined ( I am paraphrasing ) by the statutes says that IF YOU SET OUT TO HURT OR MAIM someone it is deemed torture.
Hence, the Justice Department Lawyers, the CIA, the President and others got together to craft a new program that would pass legal muster ( hence no indictments by Obama/Holder Justice Department ) and they borrowed a program that the Navy Seals and other Special Ops used in order to prepare their men for capture.
You have waterboarding sessions of 10-20 and 40 second pouring's ( unlike the Waterboarding by Japs that went 3-4 minutes ) and you raise the legs up over the head, basically guaranteeing that no water can enter the lungs at all, basically a ZERO CHANCE.
So, since the intent was NOT TO HURT or MAIM, the tactics, by law, could not be considered torture in any way shape or form.
The TORTURE LAWS stated there had to be an INTENT to hurt or maim.
Since the new waterboarding techniques were crafted after our Special Ops programs, and the legs were raised whereas not allowing the water to enter the lungs ( even though the subjects didn't know this fact ) and in all intense purposes these tactics were now ONLY SCARE TACTICS, not devised to HURT or MAIM, but instead devised to SCARE.
HENCE NO TORTURE
HENCE NO CHARGES
HENCE YOU LIBERALS CAN SUCK IT.
The lawyers who gave the go ahead to the EIT Program, stated that torture as defined ( I am paraphrasing ) by the statutes says that IF YOU SET OUT TO HURT OR MAIM someone it is deemed torture.
Hence, the Justice Department Lawyers, the CIA, the President and others got together to craft a new program that would pass legal muster ( hence no indictments by Obama/Holder Justice Department ) and they borrowed a program that the Navy Seals and other Special Ops used in order to prepare their men for capture.
You have waterboarding sessions of 10-20 and 40 second pouring's ( unlike the Waterboarding by Japs that went 3-4 minutes ) and you raise the legs up over the head, basically guaranteeing that no water can enter the lungs at all, basically a ZERO CHANCE.
So, since the intent was NOT TO HURT or MAIM, the tactics, by law, could not be considered torture in any way shape or form.
The TORTURE LAWS stated there had to be an INTENT to hurt or maim.
Since the new waterboarding techniques were crafted after our Special Ops programs, and the legs were raised whereas not allowing the water to enter the lungs ( even though the subjects didn't know this fact ) and in all intense purposes these tactics were now ONLY SCARE TACTICS, not devised to HURT or MAIM, but instead devised to SCARE.
HENCE NO TORTURE
HENCE NO CHARGES
HENCE YOU LIBERALS CAN SUCK IT.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 12:14 am to SpidermanTUba
loved hearing Juan Williams feigning indignation and talk about making these guys lie in coffins with bugs and how horrible it was
wasn't there a tv show that people would do things like that for money and eat maggots and stuff
wasn't there a tv show that people would do things like that for money and eat maggots and stuff
This post was edited on 12/16/14 at 12:15 am
Posted on 12/16/14 at 6:32 am to Hooligan's Ghost
Since they were only used to scare I would like to see you have it done to you for forty seconds and see what you think.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 7:07 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
How come Republicans trust government to do only one thing? (torture)
Because we have seen how well they torture the American people on a daily basis...need examples?....Obama...Obamacare...Benghazi....VA gate......IRS gate.....Obama....Obama....did I mention Obama...oh yeah....and MOOshelle and cafeteria gate.....
.....yep, I'd say the government HAS become quite skilled at torturing the frick out of the American people.....so why be greedy...let them do it to the rag headed bastards as well.
This post was edited on 12/16/14 at 8:26 am
Posted on 12/16/14 at 7:33 am to SpidermanTUba
This is fricking pathetic.
Posted on 12/16/14 at 12:42 pm to 56lsu
Since they were only used to scare I would like to see you have it done to you for forty seconds and see what you think.
---------------
I would do it tomorrow, if our Navy Seals and Special Ops can handle it I can to.
The better question is why do liberals so hate AMERICA and try to hurt our country at every chance ?
---------------
I would do it tomorrow, if our Navy Seals and Special Ops can handle it I can to.
The better question is why do liberals so hate AMERICA and try to hurt our country at every chance ?
Posted on 12/16/14 at 10:30 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
How come Republicans trust government to do only one thing? (torture)
I believe they actually sub contract most of the torture out to third parties, host it over seas and such.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News