Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Legislative, Judicial, Executive: Separation of Powers

Posted on 11/14/14 at 8:50 am
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52763 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 8:50 am
Separation of Powers

quote:

Separation of powers is a political doctrine originating in the writings of Montesquieu in The Spirit of the Laws where he urged for a constitutional government with three separate branches of government. Each of the three branches would have defined abilities to check the powers of the other branches. This idea was called separation of powers. This philosophy heavily influenced the writing of the United States Constitution, according to which the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches of the United States government are kept distinct in order to prevent abuse of power. This United States form of separation of powers is associated with a system of checks and balances.


Legislative Branch

quote:

Congress has the sole power to legislate for the United States. Under the nondelegation doctrine, Congress may not delegate its lawmaking responsibilities to any other agency.


*Writes and enacts laws
*Enacts taxes, authorizes borrowing, and sets the budget
*Has sole power to declare war
*May start investigations, especially against the executive branch
*The Senate considers presidential appointments of judges and executive department heads
*The Senate ratifies treaties
*The House of Representatives may impeach, and the Senate may remove, executive and judicial officers
*Sets up federal courts except the Supreme Court, and sets the number of justices on the Supreme Court
*May override presidential vetoes

Executive Branch

quote:

Executive power is vested, with exceptions and qualifications,[1] in the President. By law (Section 2.) the president becomes the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, Militia of several states when called into service, has power to make treaties and appointments to office "with the Advice and Consent of the Senate," receive Ambassadors and Public Ministers, and "take care that the laws be faithfully executed" (Section 3.) By using these words, the Constitution does not require the president to personally enforce the law; rather, officers subordinate to the president may perform such duties. The Constitution empowers the president to ensure the faithful execution of the laws made by Congress and approved by the President.


*May veto laws
*Wages war at the direction of Congress (Congress makes the rules for the military)
*Makes decrees or declarations (for example, declaring a state of emergency) and promulgates lawful regulations and executive orders
*Influences other branches of its agenda with the State of the Union address.
*Appoints judges and executive department heads
*Has power to grant pardons to convicted persons, except in cases of impeachment

Judicial Branch

quote:

Judicial power—the power to decide cases and controversies—is vested in the Supreme Court and inferior courts established by Congress. The judges must be appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate, hold office during good behavior and receive compensations that may not be diminished during their continuance in office. If a court's judges do not have such attributes, the court may not exercise the judicial power of the United States. Courts exercising the judicial power are called "constitutional courts


*Determines which laws Congress intended to apply to any given case
*Determines whether a law is unconstitutional. *However, this is not a power given in the constitution. It was 'created' in Marbury v Madison (1803)
*Determines how Congress meant the law to apply to disputes
*Determines how a law acts to determine the disposition of prisoners
*Determines how a law acts to compel testimony and the production of evidence
*Determines how laws should be interpreted to assure uniform policies in a top-down fashion via the appeals process, but gives discretion in individual cases to low-level judges. (The amount of discretion depends upon the standard of review, determined by the type of case in question.)
*Polices its own members


In case some of you liberals are unclear of what each branch of government does, or quite possibly does not even know we have 3 branches of government.

The President does not have unlimited power, unless you want a dictator. You choose. Dictatorship or Democratic Republic.
This post was edited on 11/14/14 at 8:55 am
Posted by Jim Ignatowski
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
1383 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 9:04 am to
quote:

In case some of you liberals are unclear of what each branch of government does, or quite possibly does not even know we have 3 branches of government


Oh, they know fully about the three branches and the separation of powers....but it only applies when Republicans are in power. When the Dimocrats are in power......anything goes...the end justifies the means for them because the KNOW they are smarter than anyone else. They are wiser than anyone else...and they know what is best for all of us!!!
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118668 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 9:12 am to
It's amazing that you even have to start a thread like this. My daughter just had a social studies test on this 3 weeks ago. She's in 5th grade.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:50 am to
Just this morning a pastor at a large church in Montgomery called the show I listen to in the AM regarding amnesty stating that "the President can write and pass any law he wants."

It's sad how ignorant the population is in this country.
Posted by LSULaw2009
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2008
1694 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:28 am to
Presidents has historically tested the limits of their authority. Starting with George Washington unilaterally declaring the US neutral in the French Revolutionary Wars, Polk prompting war with Mexico over Texas thus forcing Congress to declare war, to Lincoln repeatedly exceeding his authority during Civil War, even in situations were martial law wasn't in place.

The end of the Civil War brought about a brief reduction in presidential extraconstitutional power, but ever since Teddy Roosevelt, the assumption of extra-constitutional powers by the office of the President has been a run away train, akin to the Courts recognition of the Commerce and Necessary and Proper Clauses in giving Congress and the Federal Government the ok to routinely ignore the seemingly clear Constitutional limitations placed upon them.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram