Started By
Message

re: West Standings (Updated: 2/2) - Who Stays? Who Goes?

Posted on 11/20/14 at 11:46 am to
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
24835 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 11:46 am to
For argument's sake. Who on the Grizzlies plays the role of Ryno and Rivers? Is there anyone on their bench you would take over Anderson? If you consider Anderson a starter, then who would you take over Sandy or Reke?

I think they are a better team than we are, but they have flaws too.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
8184 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 11:56 am to
Oh I agree. There's a reason we're ranked higher than them in Hollingers power rankings. There's also a reason we can't sit Davis more than 3 minutes in the second half of a remotely close game.

I'd say Udrih and Rivers are a wash. Anderson should be sixth man of the year so they don't have anyone to matchup with him, no one does. But koufos is a very solid 3rd big in his own right. I feel confident matching up with their first 7, but their 8-12 is much better than ours. Which doesn't matter in a playoff series but over the course of an 82 game season with injuries very well could.

Sure you can find flaws in their bench, but you can do that with every teams bench except maybe GS
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27875 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 12:08 pm to
Is Toronto very good? Are we sure about that?

Good, sure. But very good? I don't think so.
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
24835 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 12:28 pm to
Wholeheartedly agree. My point is that they are 8 deep, and after that it gets pretty bad. We are in worse shape than that, but I will take our 6 over theirs.

This season, if we stay healthy, is gonna be a fricking blast.
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Is there anyone on their bench you would take over Anderson? If you consider Anderson a starter, then who would you take over Sandy or Reke?


I would take almost anyone on their team over Reke.
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22436 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

I would take almost anyone on their team over Reke.



Its irrational reactionary statements like this that warrant you losing speaking privileges
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
24835 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 2:28 pm to
Yeah because 10 games warrants forgetting about his insane play last season...

GTFO
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Its irrational reactionary statements like this that warrant you losing speaking privileges


Whats reactionary about it? Link me to a post where I've ever believed anything to the contrary. Maybe when he first came here and I hadn't seen him play much. I think he makes teams worse. Period. And I don't think Memphis has anyone on their roster who makes teams much worse.

Y'all need to come up with something because I'm hearing a lot of Lake Wobegon on this board. Everybody's above average. Jrue is above average, Tyreke is above average, Ryno is above average, EG is above average, Asik is above average. Guess what, when you have 5 above average players and the 2nd best player in the league, you don't follow Thunder games hoping they'll go 12 games under .500 before their best players come back so that we have a chance of maybe getting the 8th seed.

I'm as optimistic about this team as anyone because of Davis' development and my belief of how far a star can carry a team. But come on, there are obviously problems with this team. I believe a massive portion of it starts and ends with Tyreke. Also, people overvalue how valuable a stretch 4 who is a liability on defense. I love Ryno and he is very good at what he does. But it just isn't that valuable of a thing to have. Somebody like Z-Bo or even Asik just translates to so many more wins. If it were as valuable as ppl make him seem, we wouldn't have been around and under .500 last year even when everybody was healthy. Obviously, Monty and the bench are other huge problems.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
8184 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 2:39 pm to
I mean our inability to close has cost us three games, Portland, Cle, and Dallas. We held leads late in all 3 of those games and we had double digit fourth quarter leads in two of them. Everyone but Davis played terribly down the stretch of all three of those games. At least Evans won us a relatively close game down the stretch in Sactown.

We've been a very good team so far, that's why we're top 5 in Holingers power rankings. And honestly everyone in the west is going to be team watching. It wouldn't surprise me if the 1 seed and 11 seed are separated by less than ten games
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

Yeah because 10 games warrants forgetting about his insane play last season...

GTFO


What insane play last year? He's been on losing teams playing loser ball his whole career. He runs out the shot clock by holding it and then forces the offense to have a low percentage play(often his own layup). Thats fine when the opportunity cost isn't high which is why he will always be a solid player for a lower team IMO.

With him at the helm, the offense will get .9 points per possession with whoever he plays with. For a bad team that scores .8 points per possession, thats great. For playoff teams that score at least 1 point per possession, he's making the team worse. Thats why I say he plays loser ball.

I'm making these numbers up to illustrate my point. But this is how I've always felt about him. If he actually kept up this shooting, he could be coached to not hog the ball and be an asset to the offense. But he seems reluctant to do that and I'm not trusting his 30 shot sample size over the 646 he has shot in his career just yet.
Posted by Solo
Member since Aug 2008
8245 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 2:58 pm to
Reke is far from perfect, but he gives opposing teams fits.
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22436 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Guess what, when you have 5 above average players and the 2nd best player in the league, you don't follow Thunder games hoping they'll go 12 games under .500 before their best players come back so that we have a chance of maybe getting the 8th seed.


This is the most insanely idiotic thing ive ever heard. What does what the fans do early on in the season have to do with the price of tea in China? shite, this team could go off and end up being a 4th seed and you think we arent good because early on in the season our fans werent clear on the lanscape of the west?
Posted by Brageous
Member since Jul 2008
107724 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 3:41 pm to
alter and/or moron alert

you, sir, are the weakest link



GOOD BYE
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61514 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 3:42 pm to
Want to know how I know you're trolling?

quote:

EG is above average


This hasn't been said by anyone in at least 2 years.

quote:

Everybody's above average. Jrue is above average, Tyreke is above average, Ryno is above average,


League Average PER = 15 by definition

Ryan Anderson 19.7 this year 18.4 for his career
Jrue Holiday 19.1 this year 15.4 for his career
Tyreke Evans 16.3 this year 17.1 for his career

PER has it's flaws but if we're talking in vague terms like above average, it seems like it should suffice considering they all get decent minutes.
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

On what world is Calathes a very good backup PG? His PER last year wasn't even in the top 50 among PGs


He was a rookie last season and wasn't very good for the first half of the season until Bayless was traded away and he was forced to starts some games in Conley's absence. He was the Western Conference rookie of the month for the job he did when Conley went out.

We had the 2nd best bench in the NBA behind the Spurs once Gasol came back in large part due to Calathes' passing and defense.

quote:

Is his defense outstanding?


In one of the games he had to start we beat the Wizards in large part because he held John Wall to 4 points.
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Wholeheartedly agree. My point is that they are 8 deep, and after that it gets pretty bad.


This is the deepest team in Grizzlies franchise history. Please proceed on being a complete dumbass though.
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
24835 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 4:17 pm to
A gump fan calling me a dumb arse, lulz. Don't you have a lonely cousin you should be tending to?

I get it, you are a Grizzlies fan. You overvalue your team like we overvalue ours. With that said, when you look at the stats, when you are objective, you are 8 deep. We are not in better shape, and I never claimed we were.
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
24835 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

If he actually kept up this shooting, he could be coached to not hog the ball and be an asset to the offense. But he seems reluctant to do that and I'm not trusting his 30 shot sample size over the 646 he has shot in his career just yet.


No argument from me here. I think Reke has the ability to be a real valuable piece in all of this, but he has to facilitate more. His numbers indicate that he has that ability, but his instincts scream 1 on 1 ball, and that isn't going to work in the highly competitive west.
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

This is the most insanely idiotic thing ive ever heard. What does what the fans do early on in the season have to do with the price of tea in China?


You are the idiot. My point is that even the fans know that we aren't an amazing team. Its the Lake Wobegon effect as I stated earlier. They claim to think everybody is above average. But they know that the sum of the parts is an average to slightly above average team even with the MVP frontrunner. Those are their expectations as evidenced by comments made about our playoff chances.

So subconsciously they know that some people on the team aren't that good. Somethings got to give. You can't just defend everyone as a good player and arrive upon the conclusion that we aren't a great team.

Anderson gives us awesome shooting!
Tyreke can create mismatches!

Yes, I know. Most NBA players can do at least one thing. They also suck horribly at defense/rebounding and game management respectively. Time to start putting some weight behind the statements. Whats the value they bring to the team relative to other NBA players, not relative to this benchmark of a player literally good at nothing?

I would just like to have a realistic conversation where the sum of the parts actually meets what we think of the team. Boom is a terrible troll but at least what he claims to think of the team makes sense with his expectations of them. Reading this board, you would think that its possible to have the MVP, 6th man of the year, defensive all-NBA guy and 3 all stars and still miss the playoffs because the bench and coach aren't good.
This post was edited on 11/20/14 at 4:38 pm
Posted by unibrownation
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2014
78 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Also, people overvalue how valuable a stretch 4 who is a liability on defense. I love Ryno and he is very good at what he does. But it just isn't that valuable of a thing to have. Somebody like Z-Bo or even Asik just translates to so many more wins.


I disagree with this, everyone saw what a stretch 4&5 did to the Pacers against the hawks when they rolled out the millsaps and antic line ups.

And let's look at the last few championship teams.
Spurs- Boris Diaw
Heat- Chris Bosh (not a defensive liability but still)
Mavs- dirk

All three have big men who can stretch the floor, stretch 4's are appropriately valued IMO. The ability to pull bigs like hibbert and Howard and Davis and the like away from the paint is extremely valuable to a teams ability to penetrate and finish well at the rim

They do however have to be paired with a defensive force to not kill a teams defense typically (Tim duncan/splitter, Tyson chandler, asik) so I see your point there

Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram