- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
As commish should I let this trade go through?
Posted on 11/5/14 at 6:47 pm
Posted on 11/5/14 at 6:47 pm
Team A 1-8 and out of contention is trading away Charles and Stacy to team B who is 5-4 for West and Jennings. But the kicker is the Charles owner already has Lacy and Ingram to go w Charles. Makes no sense to trade away Charles when he has rbs to trade. Thanks guys
5
Posted on 11/5/14 at 6:50 pm to LSUbeastMODE2013
Keeper league?
I would keep Ingram and lacy over Charles fwiw
I would keep Ingram and lacy over Charles fwiw
Posted on 11/5/14 at 6:52 pm to Mr.Perfect
quote:Don't think I agree with this.
I would keep Ingram and lacy over Charles fwiw
Posted on 11/5/14 at 6:55 pm to LSUbeastMODE2013
quote:I think you mean it makes no sense to trade for 2 RBs when you have Charles, Lacy, Ingram.
Makes no sense to trade away Charles when he has rbs to trade. Thanks guys
Is this a money league? (first question I should ask every time). Do these guys know each other IRL?
Posted on 11/5/14 at 6:56 pm to LSUbeastMODE2013
Is the 1-8 team statistically out of playoff contention? If so, they should not be allowed to trade unless it's a keeper league. May be tricky to veto now but you should create a new rule next year that prohibits teams out if the playoff contention from making trades
Posted on 11/5/14 at 6:59 pm to TigerTatorTots
Sorry guys. No keeps and yes 100 buy in. The guy that has Charles also has Lacy and Ingram. 2rbs and flex. So why would it make sense to trade away Charles for basically Jennings.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:03 pm to LSUbeastMODE2013
That seems really fishy
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:03 pm to LSUbeastMODE2013
I'd ask them each to justify their reasoning for the trade.
Easily the guy getting Charles wants Charles, but what's in it for the Lacy/Ingram owner? West and Jennings? Ask him to explain.
Easily the guy getting Charles wants Charles, but what's in it for the Lacy/Ingram owner? West and Jennings? Ask him to explain.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:04 pm to LSUbeastMODE2013
I almost always let things go but I don't understand Charles for Jennings. I guess ask the Charles owner his reasoning.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:12 pm to TigerTatorTots
quote:
Is the 1-8 team statistically out of playoff contention? If so, they should not be allowed to trade unless it's a keeper league. May be tricky to veto now but you should create a new rule next year that prohibits teams out if the playoff contention from making trades
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:14 pm to Mr.Perfect
quote:
I would keep Ingram and lacy over Charles fwiw
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:15 pm to LSUbeastMODE2013
One more question: Is this first year the league has existed, or this is longtime league with same guys?
I'm curious.
I'm curious.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:22 pm to drizztiger
3rd year of league. And the guy who is trading away Charles never trades bc he way over values everyone. But he's normally in contention every year. Just been unlucky this year.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:25 pm to LSUbeastMODE2013
If it's 3rd year with same players, I would discuss with them first. The trade is very fishy, but you also don't want to blow up your league if he has legit reasoning.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:29 pm to LSUbeastMODE2013
Lol sorry commish. I just started a thread asking this too
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:29 pm to drizztiger
Updated. Trade has been vetoed. Me and Co commish took over half people in league involved and they all said no trade. Only reason we have commish trade approvals is to push them through easily w all the Thursday games now
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:36 pm to LSUbeastMODE2013
Posted on 11/6/14 at 9:31 am to dj30
Say what you want. Lacy and Charles have roughly the same stats and Ingram is killing it this year
Posted on 11/6/14 at 9:58 am to drizztiger
quote:
I'd ask them each to justify their reasoning for the trade.
This. A million times this. A trade should only be vetoed in cases of collusion, and collusion is most easily shown by asking both parties to explain why they are making the trade. If both can articulate a legitimate reason for the trade, even if you disagree with their assessment, the trade should stand.
This post was edited on 11/6/14 at 9:59 am
Posted on 11/6/14 at 10:23 am to Mr.Perfect
quote:Sure - If you count the 2 games Charles didn't play or got hurt after 2 carries.
Say what you want. Lacy and Charles have roughly the same stats
If not, Charles is averaging 5ppg more than Lacy.
This post was edited on 11/6/14 at 10:23 am
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News