- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How do you feel about hate ads in politics?
Posted on 10/31/14 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 10/31/14 at 6:00 pm
I'm strongly against it, honestly when I see hate ads it makes me dislike the person doing them more than the person they are bashing. I especially dislike the ones that take a one sentence clip of the other person and spin it out of control
11
Posted on 10/31/14 at 6:05 pm to Tiger1242
It's part of the deal.
I would never support censorship.
ETA: fwiw, I don't care for them either.
I would never support censorship.
ETA: fwiw, I don't care for them either.
This post was edited on 10/31/14 at 6:42 pm
Posted on 10/31/14 at 6:07 pm to TrueTiger
makes a candidate seem desperate to me when all they can do is point out how had the other guy sux instead of what they can bring voters
Posted on 10/31/14 at 6:09 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
I would never support censorship
Obviously not, but what does that have to do with negative ads?
Posted on 10/31/14 at 6:09 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
It's part of the deal. I would never support censorship.
Me either, that is why I change the channel as soon as a political ad comes on.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 6:11 pm to Tiger1242
I dislike them and think they are counterproductive; however, they should be free to run them. I just wish there were more natural consequences (e.g., turned people off) so they would stop using them.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 6:34 pm to buckeye_vol
I like them. Getting people to hate the enemy creates mistrust and distrust in the system and makes revolutionary change more possible. People called each other horrible names on the eve of the civil war and during the civil rights movement and it led to revolutionary change.
You have to get people mad for change.
You have to get people mad for change.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 8:02 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
Jesus Christ crazy
Posted on 10/31/14 at 8:22 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
I like them. Getting people to hate the enemy creates mistrust and distrust in the system and makes revolutionary change more possible. People called each other horrible names on the eve of the civil war and during the civil rights movement and it led to revolutionary change.
You have to get people mad for change.
We're not going to build your socialist utopia with negative campaign adds.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 9:07 pm to Vols&Shaft83
RW, I'm getting worried about you bro. I think you are trolling sure, but if you repeat the same nonsense again and again you might start believing it. Maybe a new hobby is called for. I hear cross stitch or knitting can be very relaxing.
As for political attack ads, they won't go away no matter how much we'd all love to be free of them. They've been part of the political arsenal for a very long time, just changing up a bit over the years to match the new medias, and our Founding Fathers used attack campaigns that would make modern political ads seem like a polite disagreement about what type of rose grows best in a given climate.
As much as they suck we are stuck with them. Now they are online too boot. Personally I prefer positive ads that sell me on what the candidate can do to make my life better. But, as loathe as I am to admit it, attack ads can be very effective if used right.
As for political attack ads, they won't go away no matter how much we'd all love to be free of them. They've been part of the political arsenal for a very long time, just changing up a bit over the years to match the new medias, and our Founding Fathers used attack campaigns that would make modern political ads seem like a polite disagreement about what type of rose grows best in a given climate.
As much as they suck we are stuck with them. Now they are online too boot. Personally I prefer positive ads that sell me on what the candidate can do to make my life better. But, as loathe as I am to admit it, attack ads can be very effective if used right.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 9:10 pm to Tiger1242
Well, with so many awful things that politicians do, there is certainly enough material to make many, many attack ads.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 9:29 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
I am so glad that you post here and share your thoughts with everyone. I wish politicians that believe as you do were as open and honest as you are.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 9:30 pm to Tiger1242
They make me dislike politicians more and in no way induce to me to actually vote.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 10:19 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
lol, wat?
Posted on 10/31/14 at 11:07 pm to Tiger1242
How in the frick can you run against somebody like harry reid or nancy pelosi (or a toad who votes with them 98% of the time) and NOT hate that person? It's no different than hating roaches.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 11:12 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
I like them. Getting people to hate the enemy creates mistrust
Posted on 10/31/14 at 11:17 pm to Tiger1242
Generally I don't like them but what if what is being said is 100% true and not just opportune political spin?
Posted on 11/1/14 at 3:55 am to Ponchy Tiger
"Negative" ads are sometimes necessary to point out mistakes, inexperience, corruption and other negatives your opponent has. Yeah, in a perfect unicorns and rainbow world all politicians would only run ads that highlight their accomplishments and ideas, but this is the real world. If your opponent is a dirtbag, you've got to point it out to some people.
BTW, despite people saying how much they hate negative ads, they work well.
BTW, despite people saying how much they hate negative ads, they work well.
Posted on 11/1/14 at 4:12 am to Tiger1242
Negative ads work and so that's why people use them.
Also, it's freedom of speech.
Also, it's freedom of speech.
Posted on 11/1/14 at 4:12 am to Tiger1242
Dp
This post was edited on 11/1/14 at 4:23 am
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News