- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can 28 Days/28 Weeks Later be put together with World War Z?
Posted on 10/31/14 at 5:29 am
Posted on 10/31/14 at 5:29 am
I haven't seen the 28's in forever and they are still good to me. I was wondering if the new movie can be put together.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Posted on 10/31/14 at 8:39 am to LiguhTiguh
World War Z definitely came across like a globalized 28 Days Later, but the latter was infinitely better.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 8:42 am to LiguhTiguh
quote:
World War Z
Decent movie, wrong title.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 8:44 am to LiguhTiguh
Still waiting for a 28 years later
Posted on 10/31/14 at 8:55 am to LiguhTiguh
I thought 28 days later was a great movie. It has been a while since I've seen it. 28 weeks was a definite step down. World War Z is nowhere near as good as the other two. It's just a generic ok zombie movie.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 9:13 am to Peazey
I guess it's just me but I loved WWZ. Like the 28s but WWZ was just better all around. Insanely great cinematography and acting.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 9:19 am to LiguhTiguh
Weren't they truly undead in World War , not infected as in 28 Days 28 Weeks?
I don't think they work together at all.
I don't think they work together at all.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 9:25 am to stegs_81
quote:
Weren't they truly undead in World War , not infected as in 28 Days 28 Weeks?
I thought it was pretty much the same thing in all three. Even the same characteristics, quick acting and accelerated movements.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 9:28 am to USMCTiger03
The special effects and budget of world war z were better. That's all I think is better. There were just so many problems with the production of world war z. The end result was a series of scenes that didn't really flow or work together. The story was very choppy, and it is obvious to me that they had to cut a lot out out of the movie then throw together what was left.
28 weeks was a complete story that made sense within context.
28 weeks was a complete story that made sense within context.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 9:29 am to USMCTiger03
quote:
I thought it was pretty much the same thing in all three. Even the same characteristics, quick acting and accelerated movements.
It's the same thing to me, but some zombie movie purists make sure to point out that the 28 movies aren't really zombie movies. They are disease movies.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 9:34 am to Peazey
quote:
It's the same thing to me, but some zombie movie purists make sure to point out that the 28 movies aren't really zombie movies. They are disease movies.
Well technically isn't zombie supposed to be occult-based and already dead people only, ie, no contracting the condition from being bit? That's the old school way I remember it but that's kind of hard to apply to a large scope. The contracting part is crucial IMO.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 10:06 am to Peazey
quote:
the 28 movies aren't really zombie movies
this
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News