- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stolen from OT: No chemical weapons in Iraq, except for the ones ISIS just used
Posted on 10/24/14 at 2:40 pm to son of arlo
Posted on 10/24/14 at 2:40 pm to son of arlo
quote:link please.
He had yellowcake
2
Posted on 10/24/14 at 4:49 pm to mmcgrath
Ah you guys. Still hoping. Praying. Dreaming to find those wmds in Iraq to get your boy W off the hook for his war crimes.
I salute you.
I salute you.
This post was edited on 10/24/14 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 10/24/14 at 4:52 pm to mmcgrath
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:07 pm to HonoraryCoonass
quote:
LINK
Since the term yellowcake seems to register with Mcgrath, I assume he knows what it is, but I'll spell it out for his goofy comic relief sidekick assrob. Yellowcake is about 99 mussent U238 and .5-.7 mussent U235, (which is the good stuff galoompy.) You show me 550 metric tons of yellowcake, and I'll show you ~3.5 metric tons of U235. Of course separating it out is tricky, but there's no question Saddam had more than enough for several devices.
How many they could have made would depend on how pure they could enrich it.
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:24 pm to son of arlo
quote:
Israeli warplanes bombed a reactor project at the site in 1981. Later, U.N. inspectors documented and safeguarded the yellowcake, which had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War. There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991, the official said.
So this was all crap that was well documented and safeguarded for a decade before we invaded. It looks like we could have gotten rid of that any time we wanted to. Saddam didn't really "have" this yellowcake since 1991 then. We just never moved it.
Not sure why you would leave it around, but that clearly wasn't the reason we invaded, right?
This post was edited on 10/24/14 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:25 pm to HonoraryCoonass
Many moons ago, a lib poster (named DA I think) demanded a link about this transfer of yellowcake to Canada because if it actually had happened, "it would have been all over the media." 
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:27 pm to bamarep
quote:no, there are quite a lot of nuts just like you.
Am I the only one that thinks a great deal of Saddam's chemical weapons were moved to Syria after he knew we were coming after him?
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:29 pm to Tigah in the ATL
quote:Indeed.
no, there are quite a lot of nuts just like you
Pretty obvious now Saddam just buried them.
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:37 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Not sure why you would leave it around, but that clearly wasn't the reason we invaded, right?
OK, I'll keep playing, but first admit this is bullshite,
quote:
He didn't even have enough raw nuclear material
and you didn't know what you were talking about.
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:38 pm to son of arlo
quote:
He had yellowcake,
you are Dick Cheney's target idiot.
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:38 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Indeed.
Pretty obvious now Saddam just buried them.
I clearly remember the embeded reporters standing by the mobile "mixer" trucks that had obviously been abandoned for some time.
Either way the obvious answer was to just bomb the fjuk out of them, there was no reason to ever go in with soldiers.
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:39 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:yes, buried by people who have never been found.
Pretty obvious now Saddam just buried them.
Surely that's the occam's razor explanation.
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:41 pm to Tigah in the ATL
Hey, I know it's difficult but I'm here to try and help you come into the light.
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:45 pm to asurob1
quote:
for his war crimes.
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:47 pm to Tigah in the ATL
quote:You don't read the NYTimes I take it.
yes, buried by people who have never been found.
Surely that's the occam's razor explanation.
Posted on 10/24/14 at 6:58 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:yes, but not just the headline
You don't read the NYTimes I take it.
Posted on 10/24/14 at 7:48 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Although I do seem to recall someone in the Bush administration trying to drum up support for the war in Iraq based on the fact that their hospitals had cleaning supplies and medical equipment. Wasn't that some pathetic ambassador or something?
How did Mrs Clinton vote?
Posted on 10/24/14 at 7:54 pm to Vegas Eddie
Here are the dems no one remembers voting for war.
Sens. Lincoln (D-AR), Feinstein (D-CA), Dodd (D-CT), Lieberman (D-CT), Biden (D-DE), Carper (D-DE), Nelson (D-FL), Cleland (D-GA), Miller (D-GA), Bayh (D-IN), Harkin (D-IA), Breaux (D-LA), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Kerry (D-MA), Carnahan (D-MO), Baucus (D-MT), Nelson (D-NE), Reid (D-NV), Torricelli (D-NJ), Clinton (D-NY), Schumer (D-NY), Edwards (D-NC), Dorgan (D-ND), Hollings (D-SC), Daschle (D-SD), Johnson (D-SD), Cantwell (D-WA), Rockefeller (D-WV), and Kohl (D-WI).
Sens. Lincoln (D-AR), Feinstein (D-CA), Dodd (D-CT), Lieberman (D-CT), Biden (D-DE), Carper (D-DE), Nelson (D-FL), Cleland (D-GA), Miller (D-GA), Bayh (D-IN), Harkin (D-IA), Breaux (D-LA), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Kerry (D-MA), Carnahan (D-MO), Baucus (D-MT), Nelson (D-NE), Reid (D-NV), Torricelli (D-NJ), Clinton (D-NY), Schumer (D-NY), Edwards (D-NC), Dorgan (D-ND), Hollings (D-SC), Daschle (D-SD), Johnson (D-SD), Cantwell (D-WA), Rockefeller (D-WV), and Kohl (D-WI).
Posted on 10/24/14 at 8:13 pm to goatmilker
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News