Started By
Message
locked post

Obama has been an impressive president

Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:43 am
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:43 am
whose legacy will ultimately be very impressive as well.

quote:

Krugman rightfully directs our attention away
from approval ratings and popularity -- measures that don't tell us much about the place of our leaders in American history -- insisting instead that we should be focused on things that a president actually does.

By this measure, Krugman now argues that this administration has done a pretty good job overall. Indeed, as he moves through a list of his major policy accomplishments, Krugman concludes that Obama's legacy is downright impressive compared to his predecessors.

"Despite bitter opposition," Krugman writes, "despite having come close to self-inflicted disaster, Obama has emerged as one of the most consequential and, yes, successful presidents in American history."[/quote]

[quote]He faced scorched-earth Republican opposition from Day One, and it took him years to start dealing with that opposition realistically.



LINK
This post was edited on 10/21/14 at 11:45 am
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:44 am to
Krugman;dr
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:44 am to
I'm going to love this thread.
Posted by FAF
NOLA
Member since May 2014
1427 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:44 am to
I wrote an email that says he is the worst of all time.

It must be true because I wrote it, on the internet.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118819 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:45 am to
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:46 am to
Why would anyone ever miss Bush?

Like, ever? If you're going to miss a president, why not miss a good one?
This post was edited on 10/21/14 at 11:46 am
Posted by FAF
NOLA
Member since May 2014
1427 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Like, ever? If you're going to miss a president, why not miss a good one?


Because, compared to Obama, even Bush looks good?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118819 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:47 am to
Not a clue. I just felt the urge to post that picture after reading the OP.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:47 am to
No he doesn't. They look the same.
Posted by Radiojones
The Twilight Zone
Member since Feb 2007
10728 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:47 am to
The trolling on this board has been getting much better lately.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67937 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:48 am to
I'm certainly impressed by how low we can go.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118819 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:48 am to
quote:

They look the same.


I actually agree.

Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27824 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:50 am to
quote:

He faced scorched-earth Republican opposition from Day One, and it took him years to start dealing with that opposition realistically.


Ah yes. The president who came into power with both House and Senate majorities and told the republicans they need to sit in the back of the bus; cutting them out from all legislative activities. Right....
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:51 am to
I've watched two Krugman interviews in the past week. He reminds me of the person who thinks he can reshape reality and convince you to abandon your beliefs and agree with him through words alone.

Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32649 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:51 am to
Unimpressive troll
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:51 am to
Economic recovery could have better without GOP influence as well.

quote:

Did Obama's policies contribute to this less-awful performance? Yes, without question. You'd never know it listening to the talking heads, but there's overwhelming consensus among economists that the Obama stimulus plan helped mitigate the worst of the slump. For example, when a panel of economic experts was asked whether the U.S. unemployment rate was lower at the end of 2010 than it would have been without the stimulus, 82 percent said yes, only two percent said no.

Still, couldn't the U.S. economy have done a lot better? Of course. The original stimulus should have been both bigger and longer. And after Republicans won the House in 2010, U.S. policy took a sharp turn in the wrong direction. Not only did the stimulus fade out, but sequestration led to further steep cuts in federal spending, exactly the wrong thing to do in a still-depressed economy.



quote:

It took almost six years for the United States to regain pre-crisis average income. But that was actually a bit faster than the historical average.




This post was edited on 10/21/14 at 11:53 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98822 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Obama has emerged as one of the most consequential and, yes, successful presidents in American history


Based upon the actual meaning of these words, this statement is not inaccurate. Because he has been successful in achieving his policy aims (legitimacy of his means be damned), he presidency will certainly be consequential.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:56 am to
More economic damage caused by the GOP, again helping to blunt positive economic policy by Obama:

quote:

We can argue about how much Obama could have altered this literally depressing turn of events. He could have pushed for a larger, more extended stimulus, perhaps with provisions for extra aid that would have kicked in if unemployment stayed high. (This isn't 20-20 hindsight, because a number of economists, myself included, pleaded for more aggressive measures from the beginning.) He arguably let Republicans blackmail him over the debt ceiling in 2011, leading to the sequester.


Posted by The Cow Goes Moo Moo
Bucktown
Member since Nov 2012
3505 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Based upon the actual meaning of these words, this statement is not inaccurate. Because he has been successful in achieving his policy aims (legitimacy of his means be damned), he presidency will certainly be consequential.


Exactly what I was thinking.

If you take success to mean that you achieved what you set out to do (although negative), Obama is pretty damn successful as a president.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
6843 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:58 am to
quote:

whose legacy will ultimately be very impressive as well.


I sure am glad you are an AU fan.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram