HuffPo appears upset with Supreme Court re: Voter ID Law

(no message)

quote:

---

question is this. Why would requiring an ID be against minorities?

---

Because libs need illegals to vote

My wife and I had to have ID's to get help from our Government when my wife got really sick, and all kinds of other proof was needed too. Proof of where we lived, who we lived with, private info, and such. That was during our most desperate time in our life(Poor) and we needed help right away. We lost everything during all this! If the Government had no problems asking for ID's during those desperate needed times, what's so wrong with increases the odds of clean elections by asking for ID's here too? Stop with this excuse that "Asking for ID's makes it tougher on the poor" because if that was the case. It wouldn't have taken my wife and I moving a mountain to get help from our government during a very very desperate time in our life's. Make a free ID program for the needy if that what it takes, but make elections clean as possible while doing whatever it takes to decrease voter fraud.

I believe in Government, and anyone who thinks there's no place for it aren't being real. But....that Government needs to be held accountable when serious wrong is done, be used efficiently, and not used just doing things that helps so & so win elections. Make elections fair as possible and stop with the illogical spin from both sides. It's BS with what they try to sell us sometimes. Boy, I'm so amazed with USA History lately, but I can't help to think this 2014 ID debate won't be seen as one of those amazing issues in USA History.

ID's are free here. You have to show it for everything. That's not racial or discrimination. ID's stop Democrats from voter fraud with illegal Mexicans and nursing home residents. I've seen it face to face. I saw the Headstart vans and the Teachers union go pick up 40 Mexicans at the sweet potato farm of Bushs can goods and vote Democrat. I tried to talk to them,they couldn't speak English. They also went to my mothers Senior citizens home with 50 pre-voted Democrat absentee ballots to be signed. There was 90% fraud there. ID's stop all of that. We also saw Teacher union leaders with obituary pages of recent newspapers and went in to vote those names of dead people at the polls right before the polls closed. They used union family people to vote those names. No Id required then, all Dem's,all fraud.

There is not a logical argument against voter ID or for the VRA.
It's akin to saying "well your grandad was a felon so we are going to put you on probation too".

Reading the comments section of that article makes me want to hurt people. Seriously hurt them.

Huffpo is one of the worst news sites available, and that's saying something

And for you to argue against voter qualification is beyond ignorant. This country was founded as a republic and there have always been qualifications and restrictions on voting. Today even "progressives" recognize age as a restriction. Democrats just want the easily bought. easily duped, ignorant rabble to vote in their corrupt, hypocritical demagogues without any check on real citizenship, residency, or repeat voting.

And if you can't see that those without an ID are very unlikely to even care about voting unless they're being paid, well you are just stupid.

All government handout programs require ID for participation, so what issues are these liberals without ID voting for or against?

What is the upside in this fit throwing for the Democrats whenever voter ID comes up? If you take their arguments at face value, it means they believe that they have a huge segment of voters that don't drive, don't have a job, don't have utilities in their home, don't have a bank account, have never applied for benefits (wrap your head around that one) and basically live off the grid in a cabin.

They either believe this is true or they are worried about not being able to perpetrate voter fraud. One of these has to be true.