Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Royals and Tampa trade

Posted on 10/16/14 at 5:42 am
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 5:42 am
We all remember the trade and many ripped the Royals, they gave up the #1 prospect in baseball, Ordonzzi who was rated highly, and Mike Montgomery who was a highly rated pitcher, for Shields and Davis.
Now it is still early in the young players and Myers showed a ton of potential last year as injuries wrecked this year, but is it fair to say the Royals won the trade?

Shields and Davis were both backbones for this club as Shields was their ace and Davis a strong reliable member of the bullpen, would the Royals be here had they kept the young players?
Posted by OneFifty
No favorite team now
Member since Aug 2012
3872 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 6:29 am to
I 'loosely' follow, but that definitely has worked out in their favor thus far. Thousands of trades are made that yield hardly any great measurables.

Overall, the stars have aligned for the Royals with utility players filling their roles & timely hitting, but the pitching staff..if they can get 5 or 6 quality innings from starters, their bullpen is ridiculous. Gotta admit, loved the Moose-calls the last two games.
Posted by OneMoreTime
Florida Gulf Coast Fan
Member since Dec 2008
61834 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 7:55 am to
quote:

We all remember the trade and many ripped the Royals, they gave up the #1 prospect in baseball, Ordonzzi who was rated highly, and Mike Montgomery who was a highly rated pitcher, for Shields and Davis. Now it is still early in the young players and Myers showed a ton of potential last year as injuries wrecked this year, but is it fair to say the Royals won the trade?
If they win the World Series, I guess you can say they "won" the trade. Since that was primarily why they did the trade. However, it would be a bit too early to say the Rays lost the trade. Myers was the rookie of the year last year and isn't a free agent until after the 2019 season. Odorizzi pitched well in stretches this year and also doesnt hit free agency until 2019. Patrick Leonard hit well in A+ this year and he's only 21. Montgomery has been a little disappointing, but he's still only 24.
quote:

Shields and Davis were both backbones for this club as Shields was their ace and Davis a strong reliable member of the bullpen, would the Royals be here had they kept the young players?
Probably not. Myers (w/o injuries) and odorizzi would've contributed, but wade Davis has been insane.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 7:58 am to
quote:

but is it fair to say the Royals won the trade?


I hate the whole "who won the trade" way of looking at it. Both teams will likely benifit from it.
Posted by floridatigah
FL
Member since Oct 2004
10395 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 8:08 am to
That's a good way of putting it for this trade. The royals pretty much had to get to this point for it to work out for them IMO, assuming shields is pitching for someone else next year.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 8:13 am to
I read that they plan to offer him 80 mil over 5 years.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60165 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 8:13 am to
quote:

I hate the whole "who won the trade" way of looking at it. Both teams will likely benifit from it.


This. I still think Myers will end up being a very solid player for Tampa. Odorizzi was okay this year and is still young. I think it fit the needs of both franchises
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram