- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Who else will be indicted over CNSI? Gill wonders--Jindal perhaps?
Posted on 9/28/14 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 9/28/14 at 1:40 pm
Readers will recall Jindals short time man at HHS, Bruce Greenstein, was accused of perjury regarding the awarding of contracts to CNSI. CNSI was his former employer.
Gill explains: LINK
Gill continues--
Who is Kunego and who will Caldwell indict? What was Jindal's relationship with Ahmed?
Aren't you glad we have the "gold standard of ethics" protecting taxpaying citizens?
These simmering, back burner stories can be painful for politicians.
Gill explains: LINK
quote:
What does he know, and is he gonna squeal on anyone?
Those questions will be all the more pointed when an indictment is handed up against a public official. In the case of Bruce Greenstein, who allegedly perjured himself nine times during and after a relatively brief stint as Gov. Bobby Jindal’s Health Department secretary, we have the prosecution’s word for it that there is more to come.
“We are continuing our investigation into other aspects of the case,” Attorney General Buddy Caldwell’s son and assistant, David, said last week. “These lies are part of the cover-up of the whole process.”
The process was one whereby Greenstein’s former employer, CNSI, was awarded a contract, worth almost $200 million, to process Medicaid claims. And the process was a pretty rapid one at that. Legislators had yet to confirm Greenstein’s appointment when they learned that CNSI had beaten out the competition for one of the biggest plums in the checkered history of political patronage in Louisiana.
The choice of CNSI looked fishy from the start. Greenstein initially refused even to tell legislators which company had been awarded the contract and finally came clean only under threat that his confirmation would be blocked. It is no wonder he was reticent, to judge from the indictment.
It is alleged that CNSI would not even have been eligible to bid if Greenstein hadn’t changed the specs; after winning the contract, CNSI was allowed to tack an extra $9 million onto the price tag
Gill continues--
quote:
This is hardly our first inkling that the fix was in. Two years ago, Scott Bailey, an investigator for in the Attorney General’s Office, got the low-down from “Kunego,” who identified himself as a former contract employee recruited to help CNSI land the Louisiana contract.
Jindal cancelled the contract and fired Greenstein in March last year. Bailey’s seven-page summary of the Kunego interview was released a few months later.
It includes a detailed account of skulduggery and insider dealing and chimes so well with what the indictment alleges that it is bound to command a certain amount of credibility. It is replete with such tidbits as the dinner in D.C. to which CNSI allegedly treated Greenstein when the deal was done. The deal came just in time for CNSI because it was almost broke, according to Kunego.
Kunego’s account cannot be taken as gospel, but so long as we are wondering who might rate a mention as prosecutors put the squeeze on Greenstein, Jindal, whose ethnicity is shared by CNSI’s principals, must spring to mind. Jindal, Kunego told Bailey, has “an India-to-India ancestor-driven background and network of connectors” that brought him and CNSI together.
When the Bailey report was released, a flack called that story “offensive and ridiculous” and said Jindal had no hand in awarding the CNSI contract, leaving everything to the Health Department.
Jindal had, however, held meetings with CNSI President Adnan Ahmed, most recently in December 2010.
That just goes to show what a friendly fellow Jindal must be. For all the many burdens of high office, he could still find time on several occasions for the CEO of a company with which he had no dealings. Perhaps he and Ahmed discussed cricket scores.
Who is Kunego and who will Caldwell indict? What was Jindal's relationship with Ahmed?
Aren't you glad we have the "gold standard of ethics" protecting taxpaying citizens?
These simmering, back burner stories can be painful for politicians.
This post was edited on 9/28/14 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 9/28/14 at 1:47 pm to I B Freeman
Not many. The administration doesn't use the state's email system to discuss these types of matters and even if they did, all deleted emails before May 2013 are gone/weren't archived. (not kidding)
Posted on 9/28/14 at 2:05 pm to Asgard Device
quote:
Not many. The administration doesn't use the state's email system to discuss these types of matters and even if they did, all deleted emails before May 2013 are gone/weren't archived. (not kidding)
I don't doubt it all.
The more likely scenario is that no one close to Jindal will be indicted but Caldwell will get some political favor he wants. You and I will never know what it is I am sure.
No way that crap went down with out Jindal/Teeple involved.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 2:20 pm to I B Freeman
There's no doubt that that corrupt SOB and his minions knew of this and most likely, they were directly involved.
Why were the emails not archived? Does that finally mean all of my embarrisngly stupid student worker emails are gone, too?
Why were the emails not archived? Does that finally mean all of my embarrisngly stupid student worker emails are gone, too?
Posted on 9/28/14 at 2:26 pm to FalseProphet
quote:
Why were the emails not archived? Does that finally mean all of my embarrisngly stupid student worker emails are gone, too?
Depends on which agency you worked for. Some agencies were archiving for what the law required (3 years).
The Division of Administration and the Governor's office were only archiving for 30 days at the time.
This post was edited on 9/28/14 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 9/28/14 at 2:39 pm to Asgard Device
Who are the down voters? How can you down vote a simple report of what newspaper columnists are reporting about facts surrounding corruption?
This post was edited on 9/28/14 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 9/28/14 at 2:49 pm to I B Freeman
James Gill is a bitter troll who would suck Edwin Edwards' dick in Jackson Square if given the chance. His decrying corruption is laughable.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 2:55 pm to udtiger
quote:
decrying corruption is laughable.
Louisiana. :smh:
Posted on 9/28/14 at 3:01 pm to Asgard Device
quote:
The Division of Administration and the Governor's office were only archiving for 30 days at the time.
Sweet. No one will ever get to read about my hangovers and the latest conquest.
Although, we're way past three years anyway.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 3:02 pm to Asgard Device
No...His partisan, selective complaining about corruption is why you should shake your head.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 3:08 pm to udtiger
quote:
Posted by udtiger
No...His partisan, selective complaining about corruption is why you should shake your head.
So you're against selectively complaining about corruption and that's why you're selectively against complaining about corruption?
Posted on 9/28/14 at 3:51 pm to Asgard Device
Gill is far from being an EWE fan. He ripped him all during his last term in office, weekly. He did take up for him to an extent over what he, Gill, saw as a farce re the "facts" of the Federal case against him. But even then, that was more of a swipe at the Federal judge, not a pro EWE rant by any means.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 6:30 pm to Keltic Tiger
James Gill calls em as he sees them.
He has a poison pen and a sharp wit.
He has a poison pen and a sharp wit.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 8:34 pm to udtiger
quote:
James Gill is a bitter troll who would suck Edwin Edwards' dick in Jackson Square if given the chance.
You sure?
quote:
Many a glass will be raised in Louisiana when the old devil gets out next year.
quote:
Certainly, he had no desire to return to the ranks of the dispossessed himself, and Edwards did not keep getting re-elected because voters thought he stood for integrity in government. It was taken for granted that he was lining his own pockets years before his conviction, and that came after he had vacated the mansion for good.
There was probably only one person in Louisiana who wouldn't call Edwards a crook, and that was Edwards.
LINK
Posted on 9/28/14 at 8:43 pm to ragincajun03
Wow...that's a damning indictment.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 9:00 pm to udtiger
I'm no fan of Gill, but you're the one who claimed he loves Edwards.
I just linked an article where Gill calls him a crook.
Lots of posters on here who would blow Jindal in Jackson Square too.
I just linked an article where Gill calls him a crook.
Lots of posters on here who would blow Jindal in Jackson Square too.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 9:06 pm to I B Freeman
Coming up on 7 years of Jindal administration and this is the first indication of any sort of corruption. He may have done a lot of politically strange things, but, he hasn't been corrupt.
This looks like a rouge guy who was corrupt before he got into the office, and Jindal is guilty of trying to rush privatization through, and didn't pay close enough attention to the fact that he was hiring a fraud.
This looks like a rouge guy who was corrupt before he got into the office, and Jindal is guilty of trying to rush privatization through, and didn't pay close enough attention to the fact that he was hiring a fraud.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 9:07 pm to ragincajun03
You do realize that a lot of his supporters know he is a crook, have always known, and don't care.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 10:28 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Coming up on 7 years of Jindal administration and this is the first indication of any sort of corruption.
There have been several potential that have been ignored. Bo Pilgrim and his chicken plant. He hired Baron and Budd for some reason. His brother's employment at Gibson & Dunn and their defense of BP and lobbying for film makers. His seemingly idiotic decision to throw billions at Shaw to build those sand berms. He and Moret's decision to commit millions to a start up tech firm in LaFayette that could not even explain what they will be doing.
Then of course there was Edmondson's retirement enrichment.
If you could monetize political stands and spending for resume building he would be the most corrupt governor ever. (How much has his flip flop on common core for no reason other than to appeal to certain republicans cost us??)
This post was edited on 9/28/14 at 10:32 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News