- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How big of a joke is the NFL as an organization?
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:00 am
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:00 am
I wish the product on the field wasn't so good, because it's a shame what they get away with.
The commissioner of the league has shown his arse. Most players and fans alike are against him. I don't need to get into details with him as they are pretty fresh.
But he's not the onl problem. The league has known how dangerous it's game is for 20+ years. If they didn't know, it's because they chose not to. The evidence was there. Once faced with lawsuits, they made rule changes for player safety. Some fans may disagree with the changes but they are necessary and great (if you believe that just because a person gets paid a lot of money, it shouldn't be okay to subject them to unneccessary harm that shortens their life and health all because it's fun to watch as a fan.) But the NFL couldn't are less about player health as evidenced by the ignorance to these issues until lawsuits. Along with the fact that there are 4 preseason games (meaningless and not needed, but $$$$), and they are wanting to add more regular season games.
The players are the face of the league, and there are plenty of good ones, but also many are being arrested for things that would cause a normal business employee to resign or be terminated.
All of these things would crush a normal business, but it makes you wonder if anything could turn fans away from the game (myself included).
The commissioner of the league has shown his arse. Most players and fans alike are against him. I don't need to get into details with him as they are pretty fresh.
But he's not the onl problem. The league has known how dangerous it's game is for 20+ years. If they didn't know, it's because they chose not to. The evidence was there. Once faced with lawsuits, they made rule changes for player safety. Some fans may disagree with the changes but they are necessary and great (if you believe that just because a person gets paid a lot of money, it shouldn't be okay to subject them to unneccessary harm that shortens their life and health all because it's fun to watch as a fan.) But the NFL couldn't are less about player health as evidenced by the ignorance to these issues until lawsuits. Along with the fact that there are 4 preseason games (meaningless and not needed, but $$$$), and they are wanting to add more regular season games.
The players are the face of the league, and there are plenty of good ones, but also many are being arrested for things that would cause a normal business employee to resign or be terminated.
All of these things would crush a normal business, but it makes you wonder if anything could turn fans away from the game (myself included).
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:01 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
The commissioner of the league has shown his arse.
Pic??
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:03 am to Tigerfan56
Feel better?
Also, not entirely sure what the question is.
Also, not entirely sure what the question is.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:06 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
But he's not the onl problem. The league has known how dangerous it's game is for 20+ years.
id say the players suing had a pretfy goos idea that it was dangerous as well
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:07 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
How big of a joke is the NFL as an organization?
I dunno, I assume a big one, in your opinion?
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:09 am to wildtigercat93
quote:
id say the players suing had a pretfy goos idea that it was dangerous as well
The retired players who were now facing poor health from the wworking conditions they went through, which they wren't fully aware of at the time?
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:14 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
The league has known how dangerous it's game is for 20+ years. If they didn't know, it's because they chose not to. The evidence was there. Once faced with lawsuits, they made rule changes for player safety.
I could easily take "league" and insert "players". Why are you absolving individuals of personal responsibility? This is a prime example of how we have become a culture that not only doesn't exercise personal responsibility, but frowns upon it.
"Gee, you mean running around crushing other people and getting crushed on a daily/weekly basis for years at a time is detrimental to my health? The NFL never told me that, so I need money."
quote:
but also many are being arrested for things that would cause a normal business employee to resign or be terminated.
The more you're worth to your "company", the more you can get away with. There's nothing wrong with that. You would fire the Janitor for things you wouldn't fire your CFO over.
And to be quite honest, why is the NFL responsible to dole out punishment immediately? Other than saving face because their "employees" represent the credibility of their brand, the NFL has no obligation to suspend players or fine them. That's what the legal system is for.
I'd be willing to bet if your workplace was highly scrutinized, reported on and constantly in the media spotlight, you'd find that what the NFL is going through isn't uncommon for a "business". They are just in the spotlight, so we see it more often.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:24 am to dcrews
Joke? Come on. NFL is a billion dollar corporation.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:28 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
if you believe that just because a person gets paid a lot of money, it shouldn't be okay to subject them to unneccessary harm that shortens their life and health all because it's fun to watch as a fan
Well, I dont believe that. They are animals on a leash and are paid handsomely to entertain us.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:29 am to dcrews
quote:
I could easily take "league" and insert "players". Why are you absolving individuals of personal responsibility? This is a prime example of how we have become a culture that not only doesn't exercise personal responsibility, but frowns upon it.
Yes players should've been more personally responsible to the dangers they faced. The NFL had more resources available to research the topic, and were even presented outside research about safety. They should have definitely been more proactive in the pursuit of player safety information. I was in no way making a case for the players, they are clearly not the brightest, doesn't excuse the NFL and the businessmen who should know better.
quote:
I'd be willing to bet if your workplace was highly scrutinized, reported on and constantly in the media spotlight, you'd find that what the NFL is going through isn't uncommon for a "business". They are just in the spotlight, so we see it more often.
This is fair. My point was that the players that represent their brand, are shown to the public in a very bad light, that would normally crush a business. It raises the question, "what would it take?" for the NFL to lose it's success?
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:34 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
The NFL had more resources available to research the topic, and were even presented outside research about safety. They should have definitely been more proactive in the pursuit of player safety information. I was in no way making a case for the players, they are clearly not the brightest, doesn't excuse the NFL and the businessmen who should know better.
What are you talking about. You act as if this research done recently on player safety unlocked a treasure trove of data. It doesnt take a rocket surgeon to realize that playing football is bad for your health. No one forced players to play. They chose to play. The NFL hid nothing. Only incredibly irresponsible and prideless people blame the NFL for an ex-players' deteriorating health.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:43 am to Nonetheless
$$$ is the root of all evil, and the NFL is an evil empire.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:48 am to dnm3305
quote:
No one forced players to play. They chose to play. The NFL hid nothing. Only incredibly irresponsible and prideless people blame the NFL for an ex-players' deteriorating health.
So that should be the rationale businesses use in providing their working environment?
That it's all ok because they aren't forcing them. But yeah, you're right, most 20 year olds have the foresight to say, "No, I don't want to take these millions of dollars because I'll be doing something that in 30-40 years will give me a miserable life. I am not invinceable and different than previous players and it could very well happen to me someday too. Instead, I will work an unglorifying 9-5 job, if I can find one, making $30-50k a year."
Yes, players should be responsible. But let's not act like any 20 year old in this world is that responsible and forward thinking. NFL has an obligation to provide it's employees with safe working conditions.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:49 am to Tigerfan56
Such a joke that its worth over 50 billion!
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:50 am to Tigerfan56
If the nfl is a joke, then what does that make the players association? The nfl is schooling the shite out of the nflpa.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:52 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
I wish the product on the field wasn't so good
#decline
Posted on 9/24/14 at 10:54 am to tigerpimpbot
quote:
If the nfl is a joke, then what does that make the players association? The nfl is schooling the shite out of the nflpa.
It's incredibly surprising that a bunch of business-savvy billionaires and their lawyers are able to win negotiations with football playing millionaires, most of whom have no business knowledge, and their lawyers.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 11:03 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
But he's not the onl problem. The league has known how dangerous it's game is for 20+ years. If they didn't know, it's because they chose not to. The evidence was there. Once faced with lawsuits, they made rule changes for player safety. Some fans may disagree with the changes but they are necessary and great (if you believe that just because a person gets paid a lot of money, it shouldn't be okay to subject them to unneccessary harm that shortens their life and health all because it's fun to watch as a fan.) But the NFL couldn't are less about player health as evidenced by the ignorance to these issues until lawsuits. Along with the fact that there are 4 preseason games (meaningless and not needed, but $$$$), and they are wanting to add more regular season games.
The players are the face of the league, and there are plenty of good ones, but also many are being arrested for things that would cause a normal business employee to resign or be terminated.
All of these things would crush a normal business, but it makes you wonder if anything could turn fans away from the game (myself included).
Great post.
I'd go on to say that while players bear responsibility for individual acts, the league bears responsibility for fostering a climate that promotes poor safety, refusing appropriate medical treatment and deliberate attempts to injure opponents. The continual blows to the head suffered by players are linked with early onset dementia, CTE and so on. Those conditions are linked with cognitive and emotional impairments resulting in poor judgement. It's not a stretch to propose that the league ignores (or did ignore) the effect the game had on players lives simply because the money kept rolling in. They also turn a blind eye to en-masse illegal use of performance enhancing drugs. Was it two or three years ago London Fletcher said at least 10% of the league uses HGH? And that was considered to be a conservative estimate. They blame the players union but they're not exactly falling over themselves to get HGH/steroid etc testing carried out.
It's not a popular opinion on this or other sports boards to say that the NFL is shafting most of their players. But the evidence is there.
There's a reason Junior Seau shot himself in the heart, not the head. He knew. He cared that someone could see his brain. And he was probably aware that the NFL knew what was going on before they let on.
"The players knew" defense is bullshite. The NFL knew more, and the NFL should've informed players.
Here's the concussion timeline from Deadspin...
quote:
1933: The NCAA's medical handbook is distributed to all member schools. It warns that concussions are treated too lightly, and recommends that concussed players receive rest and constant supervision, and not be allowed to play or practice until symptoms have been gone for 48 hours. For symptoms lasting longer than 48 hours, it recommends players "not be permitted to compete for 21 days or longer, if at all."
1937: At its annual meeting, the American Football Coaches Association declares that concussed players should immediately be taken out of a game. "Sports demanding personal contact should be eliminated after an individual has suffered a concussion."
1952: A study appearing in the New England Journal of Medicine urges players who suffer three concussions to leave football forever for their own safety.
1973: The condition later named Second Impact Syndrome is first identified. It occurs when an athlete receives a concussion while still suffering the effects of a previous one, and according to a 2013 study in the Journal of Neurosurgery it carries a 90 percent mortality rate. "Those who do survive second impact syndrome are neurologically devastated," reports the director of the Sports Concussion Clinic at Children's Hospital Boston.
1999: The NFL's retirement board quietly begins giving out millions in disability payments to former players suffering cognitive decline, finding that they had become "totally disabled" due to "league football activities."
2000: A study presented at the American Academy of Neurology's annual meeting finds that 61 percent of former NFL players sustained concussions, with 79 percent of those injured saying they had not been forced to leave the game. Furthermore:
49% of the former players had numbness or tingling; 28% had neck or cervical spine arthritis; 31% had difficulty with memory; 16% were unable to dress themselves; and 11% were unable to feed themselves;
Cowboys owner Jerry Jones tells ESPN he'd push Troy Aikman to play through concussions "since all data that we have so far don’t point to any lasting effects, long-term effects from the head trauma." Aikman's career will be shortened by concussions.
2002: Dr. Bennet Omalu examines the brain of Mike Webster and sees a splotchy accumulation of tau protein, evidence of a brain disease that Omalu calls Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. CTE is a neurological degenerative disease most often found in the brains of boxers, and provides a direct link between head trauma and dementia later in life. (A 2013 paper in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society will dispute that CTE is a unique disease.)
2003: A study of retired football players finds that having multiple concussions doubled their risk of developing depression later in life.
Meanwhile, the MTBI committee releases the first results of its study. It finds that concussions have no long-term health effects.
Wayne Chrebet is concussed during a game and examined by Pellman, the Jets physician and MTBI committee co-chair. Pellman reportedly tells Chrebet, "This is a very important for your career" and sends him back into the game. Chrebet's symptoms persist after the game, and he is placed on season-ending injured reserve.
2004: Justin Strzelczyk drives his car at 90 mph into a tractor-trailer. Just 36, he had been exhibiting erratic behavior for months. Omalu examines his brain and finds evidence of CTE.
2005: The MTBI committee releases more findings. Among the conclusions: "Return to play does not involve a significant risk of a second injury either in the same game or during the season."
A study by the UNC Center for the Study of Retired Athletes finds a connection between concussions and Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and depression in former NFL players. More, it finds a correlation between the long-term effects on the number of concussions the player suffered.
2005: A survey of retired NFLers finds a history of concussions makes a player five times as likely to suffer cognitive impairment.
2005: Omalu publishes the results of his examination of Webster's brain in the journal Neurosurgery. The MTBI committee attacks his report and demands that Neurosurgery retract the article.
2005: Terry Long commits suicide by drinking antifreeze. He is found to have CTE, and the medical examiner rules brain trauma a contributing factor in his death.
"The trauma, according to the death certificate, was a result of his injuries during his tenure as a football player. I think it is the same as what was on Mike Webster's death certificate."
2006: Andre Waters shoots himself in the head. Omalu examines his brain and says Waters had the brain tissue of an 85-year-old man.
2006: ESPN discontinues its "Jacked Up!" segment highlighting the hardest and most spectacular hits of the weekend's games.
I cut a lot of it out to fit the post limit. Anyone who thinks the NFL acted in good faith is either ignorant or a fool.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 11:05 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
The commissioner of the league has shown his arse. Most players and fans alike are against him. I don't need to get into details with him as they are pretty fresh.
Most employees don't see eye to eye with what their bosses have to do.
quote:
But he's not the onl problem. The league has known how dangerous it's game is for 20+ years. If they didn't know, it's because they chose not to. The evidence was there.
If the league knew then don't you think that the players knew something as well? I know something is wrong with me if my vision is blurry, my body hurts, my head is throbbing, and so forth and so on. So, the evidence was there for players as well and they chose to ignore it. People are acting like concussions have only been understood for 10 years when in reality there has been some understanding of post concussion symptoms for like 400 years.
Are boxers from the 80s and 90s going to start coming out and saying that they didn't know getting punched in the head over and over was bad for them?
quote:
Some fans may disagree with the changes but they are necessary and great (if you believe that just because a person gets paid a lot of money, it shouldn't be okay to subject them to unneccessary harm that shortens their life and health all because it's fun to watch as a fan.) But the NFL couldn't are less about player health as evidenced by the ignorance to these issues until lawsuits.
I don't disagree with the changes for player safety, but many players have come out and said that they needed their paycheck even if it meant harming themselves. The fact is that what people think of as "unnecessary" harm is essential to these player making their money. These changes may help overall player safety, but it will never be completely eliminated from a sport with physical play. So, is the ignorance really the fault of the organization or is it the fault of the guys making money at the risk of their own health? Shoot, John Abraham came out and said he was suffering from memory loss for more than a year, but he still played. Why is that the NFL's fault?
quote:
Along with the fact that there are 4 preseason games (meaningless and not needed, but $$$$), and they are wanting to add more regular season games.
In the NFL's eyes (and many of the player's eyes) preseason is needed. Preseason makes the regular season a better product.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News