- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Going forward, Stafford or Foles the rest of the season?
Posted on 9/22/14 at 11:11 am
Posted on 9/22/14 at 11:11 am
Standard yahoo league....will trade one of them for Graham.
Who would you rather the rest of 2014?
Who would you rather the rest of 2014?
8
Posted on 9/22/14 at 11:12 am to Champs
Trading for Graham? I think you should let the guy pick for being so kind.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 11:21 am to Champs
You should keep Foles, but you won't get Graham for Stafford.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 11:24 am to Champs
Are you about to offer someone Stafford or Foles for Graham? I hope this was already negotiate because if not, you will severely insult the intelligence of the Graham owner
Posted on 9/22/14 at 11:25 am to Champs
Im thinking staffard. But you could flip a coin
Posted on 9/22/14 at 11:25 am to Champs
quote:
will trade one of them for Graham.
no you won't 
Posted on 9/22/14 at 11:25 am to Champs
If you can get Graham for Stafford, you will be completely robbing that guy.
Do it.
Do it.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 11:35 am to Champs
I tried to trade Manning (I have Ryan also) for D Murray in a league and the guy wouldn't do it. I think most people are seeing that QBs are not worth trading away studs in other positions.
You have a guy like Cousins coming in and getting 20+ points a game. They know they'll have better results having two expendable QBs and playing them based on the defenses they're playing against, and keeping their studs.
You have a guy like Cousins coming in and getting 20+ points a game. They know they'll have better results having two expendable QBs and playing them based on the defenses they're playing against, and keeping their studs.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 11:39 am to abellsujr
quote:Especially since Murray should have been drafted before Manning in just about every format being that Murray was a late 1st/early 2nd round pick, and performing like a top 5 pick. Manning was a mid 2nd round pick performing like any of the other QBs that you could have taken in rounds 6-9
I tried to trade Manning (I have Ryan also) for D Murray in a league and the guy wouldn't do it. I think most people are seeing that QBs are not worth trading away studs in other positions.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 12:43 pm to Honkus
done deal.....foles/bradshaw/ertz...for graham
the big debate was do I pawn Stafford on him instead of foles
the big debate was do I pawn Stafford on him instead of foles
Posted on 9/22/14 at 12:45 pm to Champs
Good deal for you. Dumb deal for the other guy.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 1:21 pm to Champs
I wouldn't trade graham for either one of those two
that's actually not terrible assuming the guy had crap at QB and Bradshaw stays healthy. Ertz is ok, but a low end TE
quote:
done deal.....foles/bradshaw/ertz...for graham
that's actually not terrible assuming the guy had crap at QB and Bradshaw stays healthy. Ertz is ok, but a low end TE
This post was edited on 9/22/14 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 9/22/14 at 1:53 pm to Geauxld Finger
yeah...he had rg3 and tannehill...thought it was a good deal for him...upgrades 2 spots on his end
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News