- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Latest FIFA Rankings out; USMNT 3rd ranked CONCACAF team
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:34 pm
9
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:36 pm to Broski
Holy frick this is bad
I'm gonna have nightmares about how terrible this ranking system is
I'm gonna have nightmares about how terrible this ranking system is
This post was edited on 9/18/14 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 9/18/14 at 10:56 pm to Pedro
Did all of 2013 get wiped away for Mexico? 
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:05 pm to Broski
Wales and Scotland ranked in the top 30 what
Posted on 9/18/14 at 11:13 pm to Broski
At least they don't mean anything. I still think a committee should decide Pot 1 for the World Cup though. But maybe that would be too corrupt. 
Posted on 9/19/14 at 12:36 am to SwaggerCopter
I care about these rankings just as much as I did when we were the number one team in CONCACAF: not at all.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 2:55 am to SwaggerCopter
quote:
At least they don't mean anything
I thought they used them as part of the seeding process for World Cups. Is that not right?
Posted on 9/19/14 at 6:05 am to Broski
Zlatan ranked 32 
Posted on 9/19/14 at 6:06 am to Broski
Switzerland still makes me 
Scotland is playing some good stuff under WGS.
quote:
Wales and Scotland ranked in the top 30 what
Scotland is playing some good stuff under WGS.
This post was edited on 9/19/14 at 6:17 am
Posted on 9/19/14 at 11:00 am to mynamebowl
quote:
I thought they used them as part of the seeding process for World Cups. Is that not right?
They do (sometimes), but that's four years away. These don't mean shite. Still funny to see how crooked they are.
This post was edited on 9/19/14 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 9/19/14 at 12:20 pm to Broski
quote:Impressive ranking IMO.
Cape Verde Islands
Posted on 9/19/14 at 12:47 pm to Broski
Me no see funny stuff..........
Posted on 9/19/14 at 1:28 pm to Broski
quote:
Still funny to see how crooked they are.
Don't they publish the formula and everyone knows the parameters?
What's crooked about them?
Posted on 9/19/14 at 1:43 pm to KosmoCramer
The formula is crooked. It's really shitty obviously. There is no way in hell Mexico should be higher ranked than the US. Did y'all miss the last two years of international play?
Posted on 9/19/14 at 1:44 pm to Dandy Lion
quote:
Me no see funny stuff..........
Switzerland, Mexico, Portugal
This post was edited on 9/19/14 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 9/19/14 at 1:47 pm to Broski
quote:
96. Qatar
Posted on 9/19/14 at 1:50 pm to TN Bhoy
Understandably but are we better than England is the real question?
Posted on 9/19/14 at 1:54 pm to JohnZeroQ
quote:
Understandably but are we better than England is the real question?
Yes.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 2:06 pm to Broski
I thought so, just didn't want to be alone.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 2:52 pm to JohnZeroQ
Here is our 4 year average:
AVERAGE WEIGHT AVG. WEIGHT
2011 290.69 20% 58.14
2012 339.52 30% 101.86
2013 662.73 50% 331.37
2014 444.73 100% 444.73
2011 and 2012 are killing us.
Mexico is much more stable.
2011 485.18 20% 97.04
2012 482.52 30% 144.76
2013 383.56 50% 191.78
2014 529.26 100% 529.26
AVERAGE WEIGHT AVG. WEIGHT
2011 290.69 20% 58.14
2012 339.52 30% 101.86
2013 662.73 50% 331.37
2014 444.73 100% 444.73
2011 and 2012 are killing us.
Mexico is much more stable.
2011 485.18 20% 97.04
2012 482.52 30% 144.76
2013 383.56 50% 191.78
2014 529.26 100% 529.26
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News