- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Liberals and their "one for all, all for one" hypocrisy
Posted on 9/16/14 at 11:44 am
Posted on 9/16/14 at 11:44 am
When it suits their purpose, they take a single incident (Trayvon, Ray Rice) and make that situation the biggest story in the country.
But when you point out that 47 different Muslim groups have killed people and committed acts of violence in the name of Islam, they sidestep that fact by claiming that people are saying that all Muslims are violent (has ANYBODY ever claimed that?).
When you point out that no other group is committing acts of violence on anything even approaching the same level as Muslims, they either bring up the Crusades from centuries ago, or play the race card, or simply disappear from the argument.
Likewise, if you bring up the fact that there hasn't been a single act of violence committed by anyone associated with the Tea Party movement, they either rationalize the matter or, more likely, simply ignore the thread.
Just saying, liberals, that you can't have it both ways. We are on to you. If you aren't going to acknowledge something as obvious as the Muslim community's propensity for violence, then how can you take a single incident, like Trayvon or Ray Rice, and project that into the biggest issue in the country?
Oh, and you weren't even on the right side concerning Trayvon.
But when you point out that 47 different Muslim groups have killed people and committed acts of violence in the name of Islam, they sidestep that fact by claiming that people are saying that all Muslims are violent (has ANYBODY ever claimed that?).
When you point out that no other group is committing acts of violence on anything even approaching the same level as Muslims, they either bring up the Crusades from centuries ago, or play the race card, or simply disappear from the argument.
Likewise, if you bring up the fact that there hasn't been a single act of violence committed by anyone associated with the Tea Party movement, they either rationalize the matter or, more likely, simply ignore the thread.
Just saying, liberals, that you can't have it both ways. We are on to you. If you aren't going to acknowledge something as obvious as the Muslim community's propensity for violence, then how can you take a single incident, like Trayvon or Ray Rice, and project that into the biggest issue in the country?
Oh, and you weren't even on the right side concerning Trayvon.
10
Posted on 9/16/14 at 11:45 am to KCT
quote:
"one for all, all for one"
That's a phrase you came up with to describe liberals.
quote:
(has ANYBODY ever claimed that?).
Yes.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 11:55 am to KCT
quote:
Likewise, if you bring up the fact that there hasn't been a single act of violence committed by anyone associated with the Tea Party movement,
Hi, KCT. Lemme present a hypo for ya. Let's suppose this Sunday a big fat rich white guy bombs a black church killing 200 during services. Lots of women and children victims.
My questions:
1. Is this the media's wet dream?
2. Will they try to link it to the Koch brothers?
3. How many movies would be made about it?
4. Will the media find out that some victims were gay?
5. Will it be linked to Global Warming?
Posted on 9/16/14 at 12:00 pm to KCT
quote:
When it suits their purpose, they take a single incident (Trayvon, Ray Rice) and make that situation the biggest story in the country.
Few questions...
1. What is "their purpose"?
2. Who is "they"?
3. When was it that "they" decided to make Trayvon or Rice "the biggest story in the country"?
4. Where was this decided?
5. How was this decided?
quote:
But when you point out that 47 different Muslim groups have killed people and committed acts of violence in the name of Islam, they sidestep that fact by claiming that people are saying that all Muslims are violent (has ANYBODY ever claimed that?).
Few questions:
1. When you say "you point out that", who is "you" and who did "you" point this out to?
2. Who is the "they" in "they sidestep"
quote:
When you point out that no other group is committing acts of violence on anything even approaching the same level as Muslims, they either bring up the Crusades from centuries ago, or play the race card, or simply disappear from the argument.
Once again, who is this "you" who points out these things and who is this "you" pointing out to?
Who is bringing up the Crusades and who is playing the race card and who is simply disappearing?
quote:
Likewise, if you bring up the fact that there hasn't been a single act of violence committed by anyone associated with the Tea Party movement, they either rationalize the matter or, more likely, simply ignore the thread.
WHO IS YOU?!?
Are you implying that "you" is actually you and "they" are the liberals on this board and that we have made Trayvon the "biggest story in the country?
WTF are you trying to say here?
You're all over the place.
quote:
Just saying, liberals, that you can't have it both ways. We are on to you. If you aren't going to acknowledge something as obvious as the Muslim community's propensity for violence, then how can you take a single incident, like Trayvon or Ray Rice, and project that into the biggest issue in the country?
You need meds.
quote:
Oh, and you weren't even on the right side concerning Trayvon.
Who is "YOU"? It's certainly not me. I thought Zimmerman should and would be found not guilty.
This post was edited on 9/16/14 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 9/16/14 at 12:18 pm to KCT
I'll repeat this again for you, since you didn't understand it, for the umpteenth time:
ISIS is not Islam.
WBC is not Christian
The KKK is not White People
The NBP is not Black People
Clive Bundy does not speak for all white people; Jesse Jackson does not speak for all black people. I could go on and on, but hopefully you get it.
Now, ISIS, may be the sentiment of radical Islamists.
WBC May be the sentiment of Baptists.
The KKK may reflect the sentiments of some racists whites.
The NBP of some racists blacks.
Again, Liberals are hard pressed to make sweeping generalizations of large groups of people, like conservatives do. Sure, they are judgmental on an individual basis. But that's a lot safer than conservatives' incessant thirst for blood
ISIS is not Islam.
WBC is not Christian
The KKK is not White People
The NBP is not Black People
Clive Bundy does not speak for all white people; Jesse Jackson does not speak for all black people. I could go on and on, but hopefully you get it.
Now, ISIS, may be the sentiment of radical Islamists.
WBC May be the sentiment of Baptists.
The KKK may reflect the sentiments of some racists whites.
The NBP of some racists blacks.
Again, Liberals are hard pressed to make sweeping generalizations of large groups of people, like conservatives do. Sure, they are judgmental on an individual basis. But that's a lot safer than conservatives' incessant thirst for blood
Posted on 9/16/14 at 12:18 pm to Vegas Bengal
Zach,
I'm using my phone, so I can't copy/paste any part of your comments. But absolutely, if a conservative white guy commits a "big" act of violence, then the media would have a field day with that. If they could tie him to the Tea Party, it would be the story of the year.
Just look at what happened when that low-life scumbag in Missouri shot some people outside of a Jewish center. Not only did the media play that up as an act committed by a white supremacist, but Obama even talked about it during a press conference.
But, where was Obama when a black mob attacked white people in Memphis? Where was Holder? NOWHERE TO BE FOUND.
Memphis isn't that far from Ferguson, MO. Am I the only one who sees the hypocrisy and ridiculous double standard of Holder flying over Memphis in order to conduct his witch-hunt in Ferguson?
As for Tuba, deflect, deflect, deflect. You honestly dont understand the point I made? When it is in liberals' best interest, they will take one incident and extrapolate it out to an entire group. Yet, let someone bring up the breadth and depth of violence committed in the name of Islam, and you fall back on the "it's not all Muslims" phony mantra.
As for you, VB, you say I need meds?
that was arguably the most scatterbrained post I've ever read.
I'm using my phone, so I can't copy/paste any part of your comments. But absolutely, if a conservative white guy commits a "big" act of violence, then the media would have a field day with that. If they could tie him to the Tea Party, it would be the story of the year.
Just look at what happened when that low-life scumbag in Missouri shot some people outside of a Jewish center. Not only did the media play that up as an act committed by a white supremacist, but Obama even talked about it during a press conference.
But, where was Obama when a black mob attacked white people in Memphis? Where was Holder? NOWHERE TO BE FOUND.
Memphis isn't that far from Ferguson, MO. Am I the only one who sees the hypocrisy and ridiculous double standard of Holder flying over Memphis in order to conduct his witch-hunt in Ferguson?
As for Tuba, deflect, deflect, deflect. You honestly dont understand the point I made? When it is in liberals' best interest, they will take one incident and extrapolate it out to an entire group. Yet, let someone bring up the breadth and depth of violence committed in the name of Islam, and you fall back on the "it's not all Muslims" phony mantra.
As for you, VB, you say I need meds?
that was arguably the most scatterbrained post I've ever read.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 12:23 pm to KCT
quote:
As for you, VB, you say I need meds? that was arguably the most scatterbrained post I've ever read.
Perhaps you haven't read this post:
quote:
Liberals and their "one for all, all for one" hypocrisy (Posted on 9/16/14 at 11:44 am)00
When it suits their purpose, they take a single incident (Trayvon, Ray Rice) and make that situation the biggest story in the country.
But when you point out that 47 different Muslim groups have killed people and committed acts of violence in the name of Islam, they sidestep that fact by claiming that people are saying that all Muslims are violent (has ANYBODY ever claimed that?).
When you point out that no other group is committing acts of violence on anything even approaching the same level as Muslims, they either bring up the Crusades from centuries ago, or play the race card, or simply disappear from the argument.
Likewise, if you bring up the fact that there hasn't been a single act of violence committed by anyone associated with the Tea Party movement, they either rationalize the matter or, more likely, simply ignore the thread.
Just saying, liberals, that you can't have it both ways. We are on to you. If you aren't going to acknowledge something as obvious as the Muslim community's propensity for violence, then how can you take a single incident, like Trayvon or Ray Rice, and project that into the biggest issue in the country?
Oh, and you weren't even on the right side concerning Trayvon.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:16 pm to EthanL
quote:
Liberals are hard pressed to make sweeping generalizations of large groups of people
You must be new here.
BTW:
quote:
like conservatives do
Let me know when you get it
This post was edited on 9/16/14 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:19 pm to EthanL
quote:Is this real? Did you really just say this?
Again, Liberals are hard pressed to make sweeping generalizations of large groups of people, like conservatives do.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:34 pm to KCT
quote:
that 47 different Muslim groups have killed people and committed acts
Can you source this? Just curious.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:43 pm to EthanL
quote:
Liberals are hard pressed to make sweeping generalizations of large groups of people,
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:44 pm to KCT
Both sides are full of hypocrisy. The sooner both sides can admit this, the better we'll all be.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 2:10 pm to KCT
quote:who are you talking about? no one on here I don't think.
Liberals and their "one for all, all for one" hypocrisy
but if you propose eradicating all muslims in a thread expect to be ridiculed.
Also, having mixed up position isn't hypocrisy. Get your terms straight.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 2:14 pm to Tigah in the ATL
quote:
but if you propose eradicating all muslims in a thread expect to be ridiculed.
Not that I expect you to be honest, ever, but he didn't say that.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 2:20 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:no, but who exactly said what he is arguing about?
Not that I expect you to be honest, ever, but he didn't say that.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News