- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Single back 2 TE formation
Posted on 9/14/14 at 11:54 am
Posted on 9/14/14 at 11:54 am
Why can't/don't we use this to run? I'm tired of I formation two TE sets. It's predictable in the run and pass game. It allows defenses to follow the fullback most of the time to the ball and puts too many people in the box making it harder for the RB to find an opening. And when you pass out of it "to keep the D honest" you have one option essentially or throw it away. Single back allows you to accomplish your goal of being able to pound the rock but there's no fullback to tip the D and makes for less congestion in the box. Adding the extra wide receiver stretches the D out and gives the QB multiple options. Without naming names, it seems like the best running teams run this formation more.
4
Posted on 9/14/14 at 11:56 am to CRAZY 4 LSU
Call Les and ask him. I have a feeling he had a little more insight than anyone on the rant..
Posted on 9/14/14 at 11:57 am to rsbd
1975
Posted on 9/14/14 at 11:58 am to CRAZY 4 LSU
Moar threads on formations please
Posted on 9/14/14 at 11:59 am to rsbd
Just conversation its not like I actually think it'll make a difference, don't be a prick.
Posted on 9/14/14 at 12:17 pm to CRAZY 4 LSU
quote:
Why can't/don't we use this to run? I'm tired of I formation two TE sets. It's predictable in the run and pass game. It allows defenses to follow the fullback most of the time to the ball and puts too many people in the box making it harder for the RB to find an opening. And when you pass out of it "to keep the D honest" you have one option essentially or throw it away. Single back allows you to accomplish your goal of being able to pound the rock but there's no fullback to tip the D and makes for less congestion in the box. Adding the extra wide receiver stretches the D out and gives the QB multiple options. Without naming names, it seems like the best running teams run this formation more.
like some one said Miles thinks it's still 1975 and/or he doesn't understand basic physics . Plus would lead to less come from behind victories
Posted on 9/14/14 at 12:20 pm to CRAZY 4 LSU
quote:
I'm tired of I formation two TE sets
where's that old image of you the guy from wall st journal did, seems appropriate
Posted on 9/14/14 at 12:24 pm to ForeLSU
For a basic football conversation?
Posted on 9/14/14 at 12:24 pm to boxcar willie
quote:
he doesn't understand basic physics
Yep
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News