Started By
Message

Net #'s after the window closed

Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:07 pm
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125403 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:07 pm
United

£113,200,000, first time going over 100 mill and def first time in the hole like this. Hopefully we don't have to do this again for another 7-10 years.

Chelsea £16,100,000

City only spent 51 and net was £24,000,000. Looks like FFP works.

Arsenal £56,300,000

Liverpool £44,000,000 Suarez sale did work esp since they spent 117 million.

Spurs made £3,750,000

Everton £36,500,000 hopefully it pays off.

LINK
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 3:29 pm
Posted by Dijkstra
Michael J. Fox's location in time.
Member since Sep 2007
8738 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:09 pm to
That number from Chelsea is insane. Very impressive.
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25604 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Spurs made £3,750,000

Don't care...wanted to spend.
Posted by thenry712
Zasullia, Ukraine
Member since Nov 2008
15795 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

That number from Chelsea is insane. Very impressive.



David Luiz
Posted by TheZaba
FL
Member since Oct 2008
6181 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Liverpool £44,000,000
we're at £34m net I believe

Correction, just saw our net was £31m after smaller transfer fees and add-ons with loans
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 2:18 pm
Posted by jackwoods4
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:14 pm to
Emenalo and Gourlay are the real MVPs.
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
28259 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

City only spent 51 and net was £24,000,000. Looks like FFP works.



Or they just didn't need anyone?
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:27 pm to
Just look at United's window as two combined into one after last summer's debacle.
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

£56,300,000


seems high. i think that's about 10m off even with the highest figures for our purchases and the lowest for our sales.

we're ridiculous with our transfer fee secrecy.

chelsea spent as much this summer net as united will pay in falcao wages.

it's really incredible how much they got for Luiz. doesn't make any sense.
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160104 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:35 pm to
Bayern Munich made €3.3 million this summer.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
7798 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

United £113,200,000,


quote:

City £24,000,000.



quote:

Looks like FFP works.


Exactly as designed.
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
22278 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

we're at £34m net I believe

Correction, just saw our net was £31m after smaller transfer fees and add-ons with loans


yeah, very pleased... though I'd have loved to spend an extra ~£20mm + on a DM...
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

£44,000,000
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125403 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Exactly as designed.


yea ok

look at the last 10 years
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125403 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Or they just didn't need anyone?

Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
8183 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:42 pm to
Arsenal did have the second highest net in the EPL, thanks PSG, but I don't think it's that high. Don't think that takes into account the money made from Vela and Fabregas
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
7798 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

quote:

United £113,200,000,
City £24,000,000.

Looks like FFP works.


quote:

Exactly as designed.


quote:

yea ok
look at the last 10 years



I'm just saying that FFP's main premise is to preserve the old guard of super clubs from third world oligarchs spending to overtake them.

It that sense FFP's going right to plan: Monaco sells Falcao to ManU and James to Real Madrid in order to avoid FFP penalties. ManU spends more than Chelsa, Man City and PSG combined.

I'm not complaining as I don't like any of those third world oligarch clubs but merely pointing out the absurdity of people promoting FFP as if it helps the 95% of struggling clubs instead of merely insulating the old guard.



This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 4:46 pm
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
22278 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:34 pm to
Here's another final tally, that has a few considerations..

Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
28259 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:37 pm to
I really like what City did. Added depth. Got what we needed and we'll have flexibility right off the bat next year with Negredo's deal.

Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125403 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

I'm just saying that FFP's main premise is to preserve the old guard of super clubs from third world oligarchs spending to overtake them.



I love the conspiracy theory on this
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram