- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Will Harry Reid Run?
Posted on 8/31/14 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 8/31/14 at 2:48 pm
I hope this evil fricker packs it in.
The loser in that 1974 race was 34-year-old Harry Reid, whose putative killer instinct had killed the messenger (i.e. himself), theoretically ending his political career. But four decades later, buoyed by a series of fortunate events and a determination bordering on indomitability, Reid appears to be poised to embark on a bid for a sixth term.
Or is he?
Questions about the 74-year-old’s health, his recent move to be closer to his children and grandchildren and uncertainty about the Democratic majority in the Senate lead some knowledgeable insiders to speculate that Reid will retire rather than face a challenge in 2016.
“I don’t think he will run again,” said one insider with decades of experience in Nevada and D.C. politics. “He’s not well. His wife isn’t well. He has grandchildren. And he may not be in the majority after November.”
That, however, is a minority view, albeit an understandable one based on observing Reid. Those close to the majority leader say his health actually is quite robust, that he is intent on mounting another campaign and that he relishes any challenge, even from popular Gov. Brian Sandoval. As for the reports that the Koch brothers are plotting to bring him down, his staff has a ready answer: Bring it on.
Although some Reidites are willing to concede he has slowed down, with the signature shuffle now even more pronounced and his notoriously poor balance palpable. But they say his mind remains sharp as ever, even though several sources told me they have recently witnessed him lose his place in conversations or meander into tangents before regaining his focus.
And then there are the gaffes. So many, so much more frequent, it seems. Just last week, Reid was forced to apologize for what for him was a minor slip, more a case of him trying to be too cute by saying he had trouble “keeping my Wongs straight” at an Asian Chamber of Commerce event. This was not on par with describing the first African-American president as “light-skinned….with no Negro dialect unless he wanted to have one,” which one Nevada Democrat recently called “as bad as it gets.”
But it was cringe-worthy enough, and another sign that whatever filter Reid once had is gone, perhaps because of older age, perhaps because he has decided not to run or simply because he is … Harry Reid.
LINK
The loser in that 1974 race was 34-year-old Harry Reid, whose putative killer instinct had killed the messenger (i.e. himself), theoretically ending his political career. But four decades later, buoyed by a series of fortunate events and a determination bordering on indomitability, Reid appears to be poised to embark on a bid for a sixth term.
Or is he?
Questions about the 74-year-old’s health, his recent move to be closer to his children and grandchildren and uncertainty about the Democratic majority in the Senate lead some knowledgeable insiders to speculate that Reid will retire rather than face a challenge in 2016.
“I don’t think he will run again,” said one insider with decades of experience in Nevada and D.C. politics. “He’s not well. His wife isn’t well. He has grandchildren. And he may not be in the majority after November.”
That, however, is a minority view, albeit an understandable one based on observing Reid. Those close to the majority leader say his health actually is quite robust, that he is intent on mounting another campaign and that he relishes any challenge, even from popular Gov. Brian Sandoval. As for the reports that the Koch brothers are plotting to bring him down, his staff has a ready answer: Bring it on.
Although some Reidites are willing to concede he has slowed down, with the signature shuffle now even more pronounced and his notoriously poor balance palpable. But they say his mind remains sharp as ever, even though several sources told me they have recently witnessed him lose his place in conversations or meander into tangents before regaining his focus.
And then there are the gaffes. So many, so much more frequent, it seems. Just last week, Reid was forced to apologize for what for him was a minor slip, more a case of him trying to be too cute by saying he had trouble “keeping my Wongs straight” at an Asian Chamber of Commerce event. This was not on par with describing the first African-American president as “light-skinned….with no Negro dialect unless he wanted to have one,” which one Nevada Democrat recently called “as bad as it gets.”
But it was cringe-worthy enough, and another sign that whatever filter Reid once had is gone, perhaps because of older age, perhaps because he has decided not to run or simply because he is … Harry Reid.
LINK
Posted on 8/31/14 at 2:54 pm to Jbird
Screw that evil, idiotic son of a bitch.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 3:02 pm to OTIS2
quote:
Screw that evil, idiotic son of a bitch.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 3:06 pm to Jbird
Politics aside, nobody that old and out of touch should be in office.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 3:17 pm to Jbird
One of the biggest mistakes the Founding Fathers made was not putting Constitutional limits, ie 'term limits' on ALL Federal elected representatives.
That goes double for Federal judges as well.
That goes double for Federal judges as well.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 3:19 pm to Reubaltaich
17th Amendment was the death of proper governance.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 3:37 pm to Jbird
quote:
they say his mind remains sharp as ever
quote:So which is it? I think he's a senile old frick who needs to GTFO. I don't hate many people but he is definitely one I do. The people of Nevada who elected him are fricking morons.
And then there are the gaffes. So many, so much more frequent,
This post was edited on 8/31/14 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 8/31/14 at 3:39 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:Hmm...I have a good idea.
quote:they say his mind remains sharp as everquote:And then there are the gaffes. So many, so much more frequent,
Posted on 8/31/14 at 3:40 pm to Jbird
quote:
17th Amendment was the death of proper governance.
Kige
The Founding Fathers warned us of people like reid, pelosi, obama...and they were 100% right.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 4:41 pm to Reubaltaich
quote:
The Founding Fathers warned us of people like reid, pelosi, McCain, ...and they were 100% right.
Less biased and more accurate now
Posted on 8/31/14 at 4:54 pm to SirWinston
quote:
The Founding Fathers warned us of people like reid, pelosi, McCain, Graham...and they were 100% right.
quote:
Even more Less biased and more accurate now
Posted on 8/31/14 at 6:05 pm to Jbird
If the Republicans control the Senate or are expected to, he slinks away to count his money.
If there is any practical chance that the Dems keep in control he hangs around.
Harry loves power and attention almost as much as he loves money. Being in the minority would be more than he could stand.
If there is any practical chance that the Dems keep in control he hangs around.
Harry loves power and attention almost as much as he loves money. Being in the minority would be more than he could stand.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 6:54 pm to Gray Tiger
If the Republicans get control of the Senate it will only be for two years. the dems will tear shite up in 2016 bc the GOP will be defending something insane like 28 senate seats - many of which are in blue states. The dems are defending way fewer. The actual stats are in Sabatos last journal but I'm on phone.
Plus presidential election years have much better Democratic turnout
Plus presidential election years have much better Democratic turnout
This post was edited on 8/31/14 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 8/31/14 at 6:58 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Plus presidential election years have much better Democratic turnout
Why is this? Seems sort of weird.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 7:08 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Plus presidential election years have much better Democratic turnout
Considering the fact that there are more registered Democrats, that statistic is misleading. The turnout in large measure will depend on how much Obama has poisoned the well. A white candidate might be a let down for black voters, prompting them to stay home.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 7:15 pm to SirWinston
quote:
If the Republicans get control of the Senate it will only be for two years. the dems will tear shite up in 2016 bc the GOP will be defending something insane like 28 senate seats - many of which are in blue states. The dems are defending way fewer.
This is true, as I have pointed that fact out on this board for more than a year now. But it's 24 of 34, not 28 of 34.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 7:48 pm to Jbird
Got so excited I forgot to type.
Honestly, Reid makes my skin crawl. He's an embarrassment.
Honestly, Reid makes my skin crawl. He's an embarrassment.
This post was edited on 8/31/14 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:22 pm to Reubaltaich
quote:
One of the biggest mistakes the Founding Fathers made was not putting Constitutional limits, ie 'term limits' on ALL Federal elected representatives.
yes
quote:
hat goes double for Federal judges as well.
all judges but the SCOTUS should have to be reappointed by the POTUS and reconfirmed by the Senate every 10 years.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 8:12 am to WeeWee
quote:
all judges but the SCOTUS should have to be reappointed by the POTUS and reconfirmed by the Senate every 10 years.
That's interesting proposition. I do agree that the SCOTUS should be completely independent and not subject to re-confirmation. The appellate and district court judges would be worth discussing, I guess. As it is now, the only federal judges with terms are U.S. Bankruptcy judges who serve 14 year terms. I have mixed feelings about extending term appointments to district and appellate judges.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 3:41 pm to VOR
We'd have a better Federal bench if they were subject to reappointment.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News