Started By
Message
locked post

How long until we send troops back into Iraq?

Posted on 8/12/14 at 7:57 pm
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90606 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 7:57 pm
I see the propaganda machine is in full force on the MSM. Looks like they are trying to garner support for more intervention. I bet we have troops on the ground within 3 weeks once the shock from ISIS treatment of citizens garners enough public support
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 7:59 pm to
18.4
Posted by papasmurf1269
Hells Pass
Member since Apr 2005
20895 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:00 pm to
We have about 900 troops there now.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64658 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:01 pm to
We have
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:02 pm to
frick that shite...though as others have said.


If we are bombing we already have troops on the ground.

Sad
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:03 pm to
Who do you think is calling in all that air support for the Kurds?
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57956 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:06 pm to
Don't you mean advisers?
Posted by Bulletproof Lover
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
1900 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:07 pm to
Too late

LINK
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:08 pm to
Can we say what we mean here? How long until we reintroduce major combat units--brigade-sized or greater? Who knows.

I hope never. But if we need spotters to successfully carry out strikes, so be it. We can't do nothing.
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37327 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:09 pm to
Obama told us just last week he will not put troops on the ground again in Iraq.


My gut tells me it will be the day after the November mid-terms.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90606 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:09 pm to
I'm talking about ground troops and special forces. They're already seeing the narrative that the airstrikes are ineffective.

Only other option is to send troops in
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56010 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:11 pm to
we left?
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56010 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

I'm talking about ground troops and special forces. They're already seeing the narrative that the airstrikes are ineffective.

Only other option is to send troops in



airstrikes don't really work against enimes who first of all have religious motivations for what they do, and they don't really have headquarters or strongholds. With Germany and Japan in WWII you know where their strongholds are and where they are, but with most of the enemies we fight today they blend in with their surroundings they don't really have borders and headquarters. It's hard to dismantle an enemy when you don't really know where it is.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:17 pm to
350
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

If we are bombing we already have troops on the ground.


Agreed.

If you have tactical/close air support, then you have troops on the ground. Period. Someone is directing the airstrikes. They are not being done "in the blind."

And if you have troops on the ground, then you have a logistics support element either in theater or nearby.

And the numbers keep growing.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

Can we say what we mean here? How long until we reintroduce major combat units--brigade-sized or greater? Who knows.


It is all about APOD/SPOD and forward positioning. Secure intertheater LOC and an ISB. If it is going to happen look for news of a combat brigade (with supporting CS/CSS elements/enablers) being deployed to Kuwait and placed there as a rapid reaction force. Also the movement of an Air Force wing (Jbird?) or a carrier strike group (Navytiger74?) being put in place to give fixed wing close air support.

That is the way we roll.
This post was edited on 8/12/14 at 8:53 pm
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

It is all about APOD/SPOD and forward positioning. Secure intertheater LOC and an ISB. If it is going to happen look for news of a combat brigade (with supporting CS/CSS elements/enablers) being deployed to Kuwait and placed there as a rapid reaction force. Also the movement of an Air Force wing (Jbird?) or a carrier strike group (Navytiger74?) being put in place to give fixed wing close air support. 




Bla Bla Bla Yada Yada Yada MEU
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

It is all about APOD/SPOD and forward positioning. Secure intertheater LOC and an ISB. If it is going to happen look for news of a combat brigade (with supporting CS/CSS elements/enablers) being deployed to Kuwait and placed there as a rapid reaction force. Also the movement of an Air Force wing (Jbird?) or a carrier strike group (Navytiger74?) being put in place to give fixed wing close air support. That is the way we roll.


Well you spelled that out better than I could. That's why you're a COL and I'm still a JO.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Bla Bla Bla Yada Yada Yada MEU


And then the Marine comes along, cuts through the Pentagonese, and let's us know the real.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

That is the way we roll.



And I have strong disagreements with the way we roll. We are far too heavy and logistically intensive and it's why we have so much trouble with insurgencies. We focus far too much on force protection and not enough on force projection. Smaller units, lighter weapons, living amongst the population.

Putting a brigade sized or larger force in Iraq to face ISIS would be counter productive. ISIS would simply disband their conventional combat units and fight a guerrilla war.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram