Started By
Message

Conference Expansion to 16 is a possibility

Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:36 pm
Posted by 24chevrolet48
Beat Street
Member since Aug 2006
1625 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:36 pm
This new rule means more opponents need in the SEC conference. The SEC needs to add a couple teams, Not elite teams, just good teams.

With all 65 teams having to play JUST each other, I think afew teams need to be added to the SEC. They need 2 more to add to make for a more rounded league.

Maybe 2 of these:

1.SMU - Dallas market
or
2.Rice - Houston market

3.East Carolina - if no other North Carolina team wants to come to the SEC.
4. Virginia - Tell the ACC to take a walk.
5. Maybe Tulsa - just to be in Oklahoma.

If I could pick any of the above: Give me-

SMU
and
NC State

I see an issue developing with teams in the Big 10, ACC, Big 12, and Pac 12 not wanting to play an SEC Elite team. You think Indiana or Iowa St or Wake Forest wants to add a team like LSU, Auburn, Florida to there schedule ? They want to play Vandy, Kentucky, or Missouri ... So LSU, Florida, and Alabama and the likes will have to Schedule Oklahoma, Texas, Nebraska, Iowa, Clemson, etc... But will these teams want to play us ?? I think they will avoid SEC elite teams on purpose leaving us in a pinch.

Slive better get to work.
This post was edited on 8/7/14 at 2:39 pm
Posted by lsutothetop
TigerDroppings Elite
Member since Jul 2008
11323 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:36 pm to
Posted by Peliclown
Member since Nov 2013
2480 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:37 pm to
Nah I'm good
Posted by Cole Beer
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
4584 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:38 pm to
If adding to SEC, Southern Miss must be the first choice.
Posted by Bear Is Dead
Monroe
Member since Nov 2007
4696 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

SMU - Dallas market

SMU is not going to draw enough of the Dallas market to make difference. Do you know how low SMU is on the list for Dallas Sports fans?

Rice is also totally irrelevant for Houston Sports fans.

If you want to make a splash, go get Florida State and Clemson.
This post was edited on 8/7/14 at 2:39 pm
Posted by SouthOfSouth
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
43456 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:38 pm to
you got that out of the new NCAA ruling?
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
5541 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:38 pm to
Texas A&M will NEVER vote for SMU or Rice.
Posted by LSUfan2008
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
2462 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:40 pm to
No more expansion for my taste, but if we HAVE to expand, we would add teams like Virginia Tech/NC State to expand into those states. You can be assured that no team from any current state represented will be invited.
This post was edited on 8/7/14 at 2:42 pm
Posted by Old Money
Member since Sep 2012
36375 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:40 pm to
Nah bruh listen here. We'd get OU, VT, NC, or some big schools like that.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
16163 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:41 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 1:20 am
Posted by MrPackSix
Lakeview/God's Country
Member since Oct 2009
8220 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:42 pm to
Clemson and University of Louisiana









Posted by CheerWhine
A little bit of Mardi Gras
Member since Apr 2014
73265 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:44 pm to
Not gonna happen, but if it did, it's all about conference footprint. We're not adding any more Texas schools. If we had to, I'd take NC State and Virginia Tech, to get NC and VA.
Posted by 24chevrolet48
Beat Street
Member since Aug 2006
1625 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

SMU is not going to draw enough of the Dallas market to make difference.


They add a good team to the league. We don't need elite teams added. This is more of a opponent to add for a more balanced league (East vs West) Plus permanent opponents will disappear.

quote:

Texas A&M will NEVER vote for SMU or Rice.


Texas A&M don't have the clout or votes to stop it.
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:44 pm to
SMU? Rice? Tulsa?

wtf is this shite
Posted by NorthshoreTiger76
Pelicans, Saints, & LSU Fan
Member since May 2009
80179 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:45 pm to
Tulane and Duke need some smarts
Posted by ULL Cool J
Member since Jun 2008
924 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:45 pm to
Why do people continue to call for adding Clemson and Florida State? SC and Florida would never let it happen, plus that's not how expansion strategy works these days. Maybe 30 years ago.

And please, no mention of SMUs,, Rices, USMs, etc. That doesn't pass any bulletin board test.
Posted by LSUfan2008
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
2462 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

They add a good team to the league.


quote:

a more balanced league (East vs West)

Irrelevant.
Posted by Vyvanse
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Aug 2014
240 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

With all 65 teams having to play JUST each other

What?
Posted by CheerWhine
A little bit of Mardi Gras
Member since Apr 2014
73265 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:48 pm to
If balance is the concern, why not add 2 eastern teams and move Missouri to the West? Makes the most geographic sense.
Posted by 24chevrolet48
Beat Street
Member since Aug 2006
1625 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

you got that out of the new NCAA ruling?


I know they want to play ONLY the teams in the 65.

Look at my reasoning on my post, We may have issues getting those elite teams to come to LSU. They would rather go to Kentucky or Arkansas .. I see scheduling problems.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram