- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WI Supreme Court upholds Gov. Walker's collective bargaining law changes
Posted on 7/31/14 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 7/31/14 at 12:32 pm
LINK
Ever since Gov. Scott Walker was elected in Wisconsin, the various public employee unions have been out to get him and overturn his key legislation.
They failed to get any long-term impact in running a recall election against him, failed to get enough judges outsted to vote in their favor, etc., and have now failed at the WI Supreme Court in their argument against him.
Ever since Gov. Scott Walker was elected in Wisconsin, the various public employee unions have been out to get him and overturn his key legislation.
They failed to get any long-term impact in running a recall election against him, failed to get enough judges outsted to vote in their favor, etc., and have now failed at the WI Supreme Court in their argument against him.
quote:
More than three years after its passage sparked massive protests that jammed the Capitol Square, the state Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a divisive state law that sharply curtailed the collective bargaining rights of most public workers.
In a 5-2 decision, the court said that public workers in Wisconsin do not have a constitutional right to bargain collectively.
“We reject the plaintiffs’ argument that several provisions of Act 10, which delineate the rights, obligations and procedures of collective bargaining, somehow infringe upon general employees’ constitutional right to freedom of association,” Justice Michael Gableman wrote for the majority.
“No matter the limitations or ‘burdens’ a legislative enactment places on the collective bargaining process, collective bargaining remains a creation of legislative grace and not constitutional obligation. The First Amendment cannot be used as a vehicle to expand the parameters of a benefit that it does not itself protect.”
Posted on 7/31/14 at 12:38 pm to teke184
Elections have consequences/Law of the Land
At least that is what liberals say when someone criticizes Obama's key piece of legislation. Oddly, they are singing a different tune on this matter.
At least that is what liberals say when someone criticizes Obama's key piece of legislation. Oddly, they are singing a different tune on this matter.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 12:45 pm to teke184
Them Dems gunna be mad, madder, perhaps even the maddest. They hate Walker as much as they hate Bush...
Posted on 7/31/14 at 12:51 pm to teke184
If school was in session the teachers would be taking a day off to protest. Of course it woul be solely for the sake of the kids.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 1:54 pm to udtiger
Great to hear. Frick unions.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:01 pm to teke184
The irony of unions arguing "freedom of association" when their ultimate goal is to force people to join unions they don't want to join.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:03 pm to MMauler
quote:
The irony of unions arguing "freedom of association" when their ultimate goal is to force people to join unions they don't want to join.
Yep. "Freedom of association" and "closed shop" are mutually exclusive to most people.
And most northern states like Wiscy are closed shop states.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News