Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Cracks in the FedGov behemoth? GOP wants states to control highway money

Posted on 7/15/14 at 7:35 pm
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 7:35 pm
quote:

Conservative groups like Heritage Action and the Club for Growth are leading the charge to gradually devolve transportation funding to individual states, arguing they would be in better position to determine their own projects without being dependent on Washington. They say they have been warning about the looming crisis — or, as they put it, the need for a "bailout" — since 2012, the last time Congress shored up the Highway Trust Fund.

"Giving that money to the states is a really uncontroversial idea," Dan Holler, a spokesman for Heritage Action, told Business Insider in an interview. " Nobody across the country cares if some bureaucrats in Washington and handful of committee members aren’t having a say in how they spend state and local money."



quote:

The House GOP's bill will keep the trust fund solvent through next May. Conservatives have begun to rally around bills from Rep. Tom Graves (R-Georgia) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), which would gradually phase out the federal gas tax and leave it up to states to decide how they want to raise revenue to fund projects.


quote:

But some opponents of that plan argue some smaller states would be wholly unable to fund all of the burgeoning problems with their highways and infrastructure. Under the federal system, different states get different levels of help. For example, in 2011, New York received less than 15% of its total highway and transit funding from the federal government, according to an analysis from Pew Charitable Trusts. Montana, on the other hand, received almost 60% of its total funding from Washington.




LINK
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90637 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

But some opponents of that plan argue some smaller states would be wholly unable to fund all of the burgeoning problems with their highways and infrastructure.



Less traffic equals less maintenance of roads needed.


Or they could not tax their citizens more but rather make their major highways a toll road
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:10 pm to
This should be a state issue.

Hell, damn near everything should be a state issue
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28814 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

major highways a toll road
This I like.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35406 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

Cracks in the FedGov behemoth? GOP wants states to control highway money
Why any red state would be in favor of this is beyond me. They would be crushed under the cost. Northeast states like NY and NJ already have toll road revenue and contribute a hell of a lot more than they get back in highway funds.
Posted by Turkey_Creek_Tiger
Member since Dec 2012
12343 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:55 pm to
the feds shouldn't have any control over highway money
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18184 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

the feds shouldn't have any control over highway money


This is how they got LA to change the drinking age from 18 to 21. They threatened holding out highway funds. It is our money not theirs, let's see how,they do if we don't send it in.
This post was edited on 7/15/14 at 9:02 pm
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

Cracks in the FedGov behemoth? GOP wants states to control highway money


That's bad news for Louisiana.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 9:01 pm to
Tend to agree. The "poorer" states would get crushed. The states would have to institute tolls all over in the red states. Have to say, tolls can suck as well. Somedays it costs me $20 to go the 19 miles to work and 19 back depending on the toll that fluctuates according to traffic.

I'm all for it though. It is a state issue as far as I am concerned and the states and their citizens should handle it themselves.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 9:02 pm to
quote:


Less traffic equals less maintenance of roads needed.


States don't tax traffic.
This post was edited on 7/15/14 at 9:03 pm
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35406 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

This is how they got LA to change the drinking age from 18 to 21. They threatened holding out highway funds. It is our money not theirs, let's see how,they do if we don't send it in.
I would be completely OK with restricting the conditions the Federal Govt. could put on highway funds. Unfortunately that isn't what the House is fighting for.
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19309 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 10:10 pm to


(let's hope anyway)
Posted by wfeliciana
Member since Oct 2013
4504 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 10:36 pm to
AL,MS, and LA need to get ready for worse roads if this happens.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram