- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Cracks in the FedGov behemoth? GOP wants states to control highway money
Posted on 7/15/14 at 7:35 pm
Posted on 7/15/14 at 7:35 pm
quote:
Conservative groups like Heritage Action and the Club for Growth are leading the charge to gradually devolve transportation funding to individual states, arguing they would be in better position to determine their own projects without being dependent on Washington. They say they have been warning about the looming crisis — or, as they put it, the need for a "bailout" — since 2012, the last time Congress shored up the Highway Trust Fund.
"Giving that money to the states is a really uncontroversial idea," Dan Holler, a spokesman for Heritage Action, told Business Insider in an interview. " Nobody across the country cares if some bureaucrats in Washington and handful of committee members aren’t having a say in how they spend state and local money."
quote:
The House GOP's bill will keep the trust fund solvent through next May. Conservatives have begun to rally around bills from Rep. Tom Graves (R-Georgia) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), which would gradually phase out the federal gas tax and leave it up to states to decide how they want to raise revenue to fund projects.
quote:
But some opponents of that plan argue some smaller states would be wholly unable to fund all of the burgeoning problems with their highways and infrastructure. Under the federal system, different states get different levels of help. For example, in 2011, New York received less than 15% of its total highway and transit funding from the federal government, according to an analysis from Pew Charitable Trusts. Montana, on the other hand, received almost 60% of its total funding from Washington.
LINK
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:02 pm to weagle99
quote:
But some opponents of that plan argue some smaller states would be wholly unable to fund all of the burgeoning problems with their highways and infrastructure.
Less traffic equals less maintenance of roads needed.
Or they could not tax their citizens more but rather make their major highways a toll road
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:10 pm to weagle99
This should be a state issue.
Hell, damn near everything should be a state issue
Hell, damn near everything should be a state issue
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:44 pm to deltaland
quote:This I like.
major highways a toll road
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:53 pm to weagle99
quote:Why any red state would be in favor of this is beyond me. They would be crushed under the cost. Northeast states like NY and NJ already have toll road revenue and contribute a hell of a lot more than they get back in highway funds.
Cracks in the FedGov behemoth? GOP wants states to control highway money
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:55 pm to weagle99
the feds shouldn't have any control over highway money
Posted on 7/15/14 at 9:01 pm to Turkey_Creek_Tiger
quote:
the feds shouldn't have any control over highway money
This is how they got LA to change the drinking age from 18 to 21. They threatened holding out highway funds. It is our money not theirs, let's see how,they do if we don't send it in.
This post was edited on 7/15/14 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 7/15/14 at 9:01 pm to weagle99
quote:
Cracks in the FedGov behemoth? GOP wants states to control highway money
That's bad news for Louisiana.
Posted on 7/15/14 at 9:01 pm to mmcgrath
Tend to agree. The "poorer" states would get crushed. The states would have to institute tolls all over in the red states. Have to say, tolls can suck as well. Somedays it costs me $20 to go the 19 miles to work and 19 back depending on the toll that fluctuates according to traffic.
I'm all for it though. It is a state issue as far as I am concerned and the states and their citizens should handle it themselves.
I'm all for it though. It is a state issue as far as I am concerned and the states and their citizens should handle it themselves.
Posted on 7/15/14 at 9:02 pm to deltaland
quote:
Less traffic equals less maintenance of roads needed.
States don't tax traffic.
This post was edited on 7/15/14 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 7/15/14 at 9:10 pm to StrangeBrew
quote:I would be completely OK with restricting the conditions the Federal Govt. could put on highway funds. Unfortunately that isn't what the House is fighting for.
This is how they got LA to change the drinking age from 18 to 21. They threatened holding out highway funds. It is our money not theirs, let's see how,they do if we don't send it in.
Posted on 7/15/14 at 10:36 pm to weagle99
AL,MS, and LA need to get ready for worse roads if this happens.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News