- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
High court voids 35-foot abortion clinic buffer
Posted on 6/26/14 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 12:36 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
While the court was unanimous in the overall outcome
This again. What is going on?
Well this will bring all this SC kumbaya stuff to a halt.
quote:
The justices will meet one last time on Monday to hand down decisions in cases involving the Obama health law requirement that employers cover women's contraception in their employee health plans and the ability of unions representing government employees to collect fees from workers who don't wish to join the union.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 12:46 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
High court voids 35-foot abortion clinic buffer
Has 35 feet been considered too far? It's slightly over half the distance between the pitching rubber and home plate.
How close must anyone come to another to holler at them, regardless of what they are hollering about?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 12:52 pm to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
It's slightly over half the distance between the pitching rubber and home plate.
Yeah but it's over the length of a first down and we all know that can seem like a mile at times.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 12:58 pm to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
How close must anyone come to another to holler at them, regardless of what they are hollering about?
I'm not sure but the SCOTUS ruled against the 35 toot buffer zone when any portion of it is on public property.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 12:59 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
Yeah but it's over the length of a first down and we all know that can seem like a mile at times.
I was actually being serious and used that as merely a real world example of the distance.
Has 35' been seen as some barrier for those looking to protest abortion clinics? What are they unable to do at 35' that would be better done at 10', or less?
If 35' makes it so that because of the layout of the facility you'd have to stand in the street or be unable to protest because of the physical layout, then I can see an issue. If it has more to do with not feeling the details in their signs are not clear enough or something, then I'm not seeing the issue.
What am I missing?
FTR, I support anyone's right to protest...even those religious hacks at Westboro. I also tend to think that protesting, by it's very nature, pits tqo opposing sides in close proximity and having a nice little buffer zone seems like a solid practice.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 1:00 pm to DawgfaninCa
This actually affects my trip to bring my daughter to pre-K every morning. As I've mentioned before on here, we walk past them every day.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 1:01 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
This again. What is going on?
Best guess?
The conservative bloc is holding strong at 4, with a swing vote to get them to 5 pushing them over the top, and the other 4 would rather push out a somewhat moderated verdict than whatever Scalia, Thomas, or Alito would write.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 1:49 pm to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
What am I missing?
My post above yours.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 1:52 pm to DawgfaninCa
Seems like 35 feet on any side of an abortion clinic would be infringing on other properties making this a big headache to sort through.
Just a thought though. I have no idea what has been discussed on this.
Just a thought though. I have no idea what has been discussed on this.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 1:54 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
quote:
head up their butts
Take it up with the Wise Latina, bucko!
Posted on 6/26/14 at 2:00 pm to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
What am I missing?
My opinion is that a protester should never touch or impede someone from entering an abortion clinic. However, their right to voice a thought should not be restricted in any way. Demanding that they stand in a particular area is a restriction I do not agree with.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 2:13 pm to Jay Quest
I think they need to be further than spittin distance.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 3:18 pm to DawgfaninCa
We don't have free speech zones in this country and we shouldn't. That said, no protestor should ever touch someone from the opposing sign and idk how to prevent that without required separation. This is the correct decision but we will have to find a other solution to prevent violence.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 3:19 pm to LSUGrrrl
quote:
That said, no protestor should ever touch someone from the opposing sign and idk how to prevent that without required separation.
Existing battery laws?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 3:22 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I agree. But this is a very emotional topic for some people and emotion often leads to non-rational behavior. Are there always cops out there? I agree we don't need new laws but I also know some people won't be able to control themselves.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News