- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Want to reduce Co2 emissions without net removal of money from the economy?
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:05 am
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:05 am
Want to reduce Co2 emissions without net removal of money from the economy?
Take Waxman-Markey and change it from 85% free allocations to 100%.
Take Waxman-Markey and change it from 85% free allocations to 100%.
11
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:09 am to SpidermanTUba
I regret I can only down vote this thread one time.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:09 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Want to reduce Co2 emissions
Why the war plants, trying to starve them?
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:12 am to wickowick
Carbon Dixoide is not a pollutant.
Carbon Dioxide concentrations trail temperature increases, not lead them.
The right amount of Carbon Dioxide has yet to be established.
Carbon Dioxide concentrations trail temperature increases, not lead them.
The right amount of Carbon Dioxide has yet to be established.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:12 am to wickowick
Carbon dioxide works very well to kill bed bugs.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:14 am to wickowick
quote:
Why the war plants, trying to starve them?
WTF does that even mean?
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:15 am to SpidermanTUba
somebody call an exterminator, we have a spider problem.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:15 am to SpidermanTUba
Bro, do you even photosynthesis?
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:18 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Carbon Dixoide is not a pollutant.
Except in coal mines, right?
quote:
Carbon Dioxide concentrations trail temperature increases, not lead them.
Warming causes Co2 release which causes warming. Its a positive feedback cycle.
quote:
The right amount of Carbon Dioxide has yet to be established.
I'm not even sure what you're talking about. THe right amount for what? If you're trying to grow aquarium plants I'd highly recommend supplementing with as much CO2 as possible.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:20 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Warming causes Co2 release which causes warming.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:28 am to SpidermanTUba
the only way we can reduce co2 and not hurt the economy is if the market moves in that direction without government pulling it in that direction.
I think it can naturally happen without the help of the government, but this isa big talking point for dems so they can't keep the government's hand out of it.
edit: the earth may be warming but I have yet to see anything suggest that it is going to cause havoc on the earth. There are minor changes happening but nothing that will cause the earth to explode or something
I think it can naturally happen without the help of the government, but this isa big talking point for dems so they can't keep the government's hand out of it.
edit: the earth may be warming but I have yet to see anything suggest that it is going to cause havoc on the earth. There are minor changes happening but nothing that will cause the earth to explode or something
This post was edited on 6/16/14 at 9:30 am
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:30 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Warming causes Co2 release which causes warming. Its a positive feedback cycle.
then why didnt the earth burn up when CO2 concentrations were like 3-5 times higher in the past?
fricking moron.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:30 am to catholictigerfan
quote:
the only way we can reduce co2 and not hurt the economy is if the market moves in that direction without government pulling it in that direction.
That would seem to NOT be the case for Nox emissions trading. But hey, don't let facts get in your way.
quote:
I think it can naturally happen without the help of the government,
How? Magic? At present, there's no profit motive to reduce Co2 emissions
This post was edited on 6/16/14 at 9:31 am
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:30 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Want to reduce Co2 emissions without net removal of money from the economy?
You could always stop breathing. Every little bit helps.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:30 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:Why?
Want to reduce Co2 emissions
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:30 am to LSURussian
Hang in there.
There will be other opportunities to down vote other threads from the same poster.
So, keep lookin' on the Sunny Side of Life!
There will be other opportunities to down vote other threads from the same poster.
So, keep lookin' on the Sunny Side of Life!
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:31 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:Can I borrow that little gem?
Warming causes Co2 release which causes warming. Its a positive feedback cycle.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:33 am to SpidermanTUba
If you want to reduce Co2 omissions how about stop blowing into that stupid "tuba"?
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:35 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
THe right amount for what?
Exactly. I couldn't have said it better myself.
The right amount for what?
If you can't tell me what the correct concentrations are WHY THE frick ARE YOU TRYING TO REGULATE THEM?
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:36 am to Gray Tiger
quote:
You could always stop breathing. Every little bit helps.
That wouldn't make a difference at all. Exhaling Co2 only returns carbon to the atmosphere that was recently removed from it by the plants the person eats (either by direct consumption or indirect consumption through meat). It would make no net difference at all.
If you're going to be sarcastic you should at least be scientifically accurate.
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News