Started By
Message
locked post

Woody Jenkins files lawsuit challenging annexation of Mall and Hospital

Posted on 6/12/14 at 11:27 am
Posted by Kramer26
St. George, LA
Member since Jan 2005
6400 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 11:27 am
This should be an interesting court battle. He makes a strong case.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 11:29 am to
Link brah
Posted by Jimbeaux28
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
4051 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 11:29 am to
Before you get hammered for not providing link

Eta: too late
This post was edited on 6/12/14 at 11:30 am
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101311 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Woody Jenkins


Geeze, that's a name I haven't heard in a while. What fricking rock did he crawl out from under?

I can only hope his reemergence doesn't frick up the senatorial election as he did when he chose to run against Mary.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94870 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 11:30 am to
Jenkins is a crazy fricker but he's got a point, such as including the railroad land in the annexation to keep it contiguous without the railroad's request to be included.
Posted by real
Dixieland
Member since Oct 2007
14027 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 11:32 am to
And to think , he lmost beat Mary!
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23017 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 11:50 am to
How does Woody Jenkins have standing to file this petition? What harm has come to him?
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
12295 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Woody Jenkins




Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
35910 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

How does Woody Jenkins have standing to file this petition? What harm has come to him?


He provided that in his lawsuit.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:00 pm to
I'm glad someone got the ball rolling on this. There were going to be lawsuits anyway so why not get them started now?

quote:

How does Woody Jenkins have standing to file this petition? What harm has come to him?
He probably owns some property in what would be St George. That's my speculation anyway.

I have not heard if the AG's office has issued an opinion about the validity of the signature petition since the annexations. Has anyone else heard anything?
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
35910 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Jenkins is a crazy fricker but he's got a point, such as including the railroad land in the annexation to keep it contiguous without the railroad's request to be included.


I don't know if he is going to win or not; however, when you look at the annexation on a map you know it was done for one reason and one reason only and the people pushing to have it done didn't care as long as they secured their tax revenues.

The result is more Swiss cheese city, but they didn't care.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56379 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Jenkins is a crazy fricker but he's got a point, such as including the railroad land in the annexation to keep it contiguous without the railroad's request to be included.



Agree.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23017 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

He provided that in his lawsuit.


What's he suing for then? What damages is he requesting? Why can't you just tell me rather than avoid answering if you know the answer.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

The suit, filed against the Metro Council and the City of Baton Rouge early Thursday morning, claims that the annexation creates a burden for law enforcement and “fails to meet the requirements of reasonableness” because it excludes anchor stores at the mall and was drawn around other properties.
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:12 pm to
St. Georgians just looking out for their #1 interest, tax money.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56379 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

What's he suing for then? What damages is he requesting? Why can't you just tell me rather than avoid answering if you know the answer.



Dude, the lawsuit is listed in the original link.

It might help if you read it before arguing against it.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101311 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

The suit, filed against the Metro Council and the City of Baton Rouge early Thursday morning, claims that the annexation creates a burden for law enforcement and “fails to meet the requirements of reasonableness” because it excludes anchor stores at the mall and was drawn around other properties.


None of that would seem to establish Woody's personal standing, though.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23017 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:15 pm to
That's my point. I read the link. Law enforcement "problems" have nothing to do with harm caused to Woody Jenkins.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56379 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

None of that would seem to establish Woody's personal standing, though.



In the lawsuit...

quote:

Plaintiff, who is a citizen of Baton Rouge, owns three tracts of land and three houses in Baton Rouge. He pays more than $7,000 a year in property taxes. He resides in a "high crime" area and has recently been a victim of crime and would be particularly affected by any reduction in police or fire protection services...
This post was edited on 6/12/14 at 12:16 pm
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94870 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

None of that would seem to establish Woody's personal standing, though.


quote:

Plaintiff, who is a citizen of Baton Rouge, owns three tracts of land and three houses in Baton Rouge. He pays more than $7,000 a year in property taxes. He resides in a "high crime" area and has recently been a victim of crime and would be particularly affected by any reduction in police or fire protection services.


snip

quote:

The plaintiff has a very real interest in police and fire protection provided in high crime areas in the inner city. He objects to any action that would divert vital public safety services that are already stretched very thin to a remote area that is already well served by the Sheriff but that could consume important resources of the City of Baton Rouge that would be better spent protecting citizens where crime is the highest.


In short, he says "BR can't fricking do its job right as of now BEFORE they start trying to grab areas already serviced by BRPSO and St. George. That raises the chances I get killed by some assholes while waiting for the cops to arrive."
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram