Started By
Message

What baseball rules do you dislike??

Posted on 4/16/14 at 7:34 am
Posted by Hold That Tiger 10
Member since Oct 2013
21061 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 7:34 am
Mine for some reason is a ball in the dirt for strike 3 and the batter swings and misses for the K and can still advance.

I just don't like it. If a batter swings and misses for the third strike then it's an out. You punish a pitcher for a dominant curve ball that gets away from the catcher and allow a runner on base. I know it happens very seldom in the majors and even college with great catchers, but I still don't like it.
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
93718 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 7:36 am to
This no blocking the plate bullshite is something that I just can't get over...
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61823 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 7:40 am to
quote:

This no blocking the plate bull shite is something that I just can't get over...


I think the more appropriate rule change would be to disallow runners the opportunity to run over the catcher/fielder. MLB had turned into all base runners ignoring the slide in an attempt to run over the catcher. I saw numerous plays where the runner would have been safe if they would have tried to slide past a tag, but instead they just ran over the catcher and got tagged with the ball.
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
28394 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 7:52 am to
Catcher's indifference doesn't count as a stolen base.
Posted by kjntgr
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8486 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 7:54 am to
The whole 9 innings rule, why can't they play 6 or 7
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48939 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 7:56 am to
DH
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77582 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 7:57 am to
quote:

DH


Yep.


I tell you, the one I really love is the infield fly rule...
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 8:00 am to
quote:

Catcher's indifference doesn't count as a stolen base
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
38123 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 8:02 am to
quote:

DH


I actually don't mind the DH...I just wish the NL and AL were on the same page. Makes no sense to me why AL has it and NL doesn't. Make it the same either way.
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48939 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 8:05 am to
Thats what I'm getting at, bw
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101919 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Catcher's indifference doesn't count as a stolen base.


This.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60297 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 8:14 am to
Wood bats and no PEDs. Give them composites and HGH. Let's see some bombs.
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6372 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 9:49 am to
I don't like rules that are only half-rules. The ones that aren't clearly defined and thus open to interpretation like check swings and infield fly.

The infield fly is in of itself a good rule, but its enforcement is not clearly defined.

And for checked swings, there's no definition of what one actually is. I particularly hate it with two man umpire crews when they appeal to the ump who can be on the back side of the batter or standing at second base.
Posted by Tbonepatron
Member since Aug 2013
8447 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 9:58 am to
The "unwritten" ones...
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77410 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:03 am to
My number one rule would be to limit how many times a pitcher can throw over to first.


Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:06 am to
Runners on 1st and 3rd.

Fly ball to the outfield, caught by the outfielder. Catch is made and the runner tags from 3rd and heads toward home. However, the runner on 1st is too far off, and the throw to 1st doubles him off.

However, if the runner who was at 3rd touches home before the out is recorded at 1st, the runs still counts.

This is retarded, IMO. I can see that run counting on a play that involves tagging the runner. But in the original scenario above, this is a force-out at 1st base. If a team makes that big of a base running mistake, then that run shouldn't count.

By the way, this scenario is from an LSU baseball game over the weekend when the center fielder for Arkansas made a really nice play and doubled the runner off 1st base.
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:09 am to
It's not an official rule, but I wish you could show more emotion on the field without suffering the ramifications. My primary example would be the WBC. Look at how much fun those guys had playing ball. You could hit a homerun, admire it for a little, and not worry about getting beaned your next at bat. If a guy is pitching a great game and gets pumped after a big K, let him live in the moment. Baseball doesn't have to be so stiff.
Posted by Stogie
Member since Apr 2014
258 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:21 am to
quote:

this is a force-out at 1st base


Weird play indeed

quote:

There can never be a force play when a fly ball is caught. Here is an example that is often called incorrectly. With runners on first and third with one out, the batter hits a fly ball to the outfield that is caught. The runner on third legally tags and scores, but the runner on first goes half-way and fails to tag. The outfielder throws to first and the throw beats the runner attempting to return to first. The run from third counts, since this is a time play and the run scored before the 3rd out was made at first. When the ball was caught in the outfield, the runner on first is not forced to second, but is free to return to the base. Since a tag at first is not required (the ball must only beat the runner to the bag and be in legal possession of a defensive player), many umpires incorrectly interpret this as a force play and do not score the run.
This post was edited on 4/16/14 at 10:22 am
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48939 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Runners on 1st and 3rd.

Fly ball to the outfield, caught by the outfielder. Catch is made and the runner tags from 3rd and heads toward home. However, the runner on 1st is too far off, and the throw to 1st doubles him off.

However, if the runner who was at 3rd touches home before the out is recorded at 1st, the runs still counts.

This is retarded, IMO. I can see that run counting on a play that involves tagging the runner. But in the original scenario above, this is a force-out at 1st base. If a team makes that big of a base running mistake, then that run shouldn't count.


completely disagree. I like the rule
This post was edited on 4/16/14 at 10:24 am
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
38123 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:22 am to
quote:

It's not an official rule, but I wish you could show more emotion on the field without suffering the ramifications. My primary example would be the WBC. Look at how much fun those guys had playing ball. You could hit a homerun, admire it for a little, and not worry about getting beaned your next at bat. If a guy is pitching a great game and gets pumped after a big K, let him live in the moment. Baseball doesn't have to be so stiff.


I agree....players and umps can be so sensitive.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram