- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
MSNBC host goes Know-Nothing on Supreme Court
Posted on 3/25/14 at 11:01 am
Posted on 3/25/14 at 11:01 am
Following in the footprints of Stiehm from a couple months ago
Link to the Stiehm thread
quote:
...
Now, the most famous use of corporate personhood was Citizens United, which opened the door to corporate people spending lots of money to sway elections. The new cases ask whether corporations are not just people, but people who can have religious beliefs. Can the Hobby Lobby Craft Store chain, and Conestoga Wood Specialties of Pennsylvania claim that covering contraception in their employees’ health plans violates their rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration act, which says government can’t substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion? And can a New Mexico photographer refuse to shoot a gay wedding through her corporate expression of herself? The Obama administration is arguing that corporations are, in fact, not people, and that they can’t shield themselves behind religious beliefs. The court that will decide includes six Catholic justices, some of whom have not been shy about asserting their religion. And all of this is taking place as the country becomes more secular. Even as the fervently religious fight even harder than ever to push creationism in taxpayer funded schools, and on science TV shows. And where the question of corporate personhood has gone from whether the railroad has to pay its taxes to whether corporations can be religious people. The question is do you trust this court to make those decisions?
Link to the Stiehm thread
Posted on 3/25/14 at 11:03 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
The Obama administration is arguing that corporations are, in fact, not people
Then stop taxing them.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 11:04 am to TN Bhoy
I'm sure those Justices are all learned men of the Knights of the White Camelia as well
Posted on 3/25/14 at 11:13 am to wilfont
quote:
quote:
The Obama administration is arguing that corporations are, in fact, not people
Then stop taxing them.
Yep, you can't have it both ways but of course that's exactly what the hypocritical Obama wants.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 11:18 am to davesdawgs
I thought MSNBC was quite fond of the wise Latina woman. They are painting with a broad brush here.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 11:22 am to TN Bhoy
Barack Obama had two opportunities to nominate Supreme Court justices. He nominated followers of the Catholic and Jewish religions. Do you think Stiehm trusts them to make the decisions at issue?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News