- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WSJ: Warmists Leave Europe Vulnerable to Putin
Posted on 3/21/14 at 6:13 am
Posted on 3/21/14 at 6:13 am
quote:
Green Politics Made Europe Vulnerable to Putin
Germany's dependence on renewable energy is a bonanza for Gazprom.
Until the crisis over Ukraine, there was an inbuilt tendency in Germany to embrace closer ties with Russia. Former Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder is close to Vladimir Putin (he has compared Russia's intervention in Ukraine to NATO's action against Serbia in the 1990s) and is chairman of the board of Gazprom joint-venture pipeline company Nord Stream. In 2012, Russia piped 30 billion cubic meters of natural gas to Germany, accounting for 28% of the 105.5 billion cubic meters of gas delivered to the European Union.
Friendships aside, the most significant driver of German energy-related foreign policy has been its powerful Green Party. Other countries considering letting domestic or foreign policy be determined by environmentalists would do well to consider where Germany's embrace of environmentalism has led.
........
In October 1980, Germany's Green Party was formed to stand in parliamentary and state elections. Eighteen years later it entered government in a Red-Green coalition with the left-of-center SPD and in 2000 successfully pushed for the gradual phaseout of nuclear power.
The Greens' biggest triumph came with Germany's adoption of its Energiewende, the transition to renewable energy. The policy is a long-term bonanza for Gazprom. It means that Germany will buy more and more Russian gas because it cannot depend on electricity from unreliable wind and solar to power its industries and keep the lights on.
The emergence of the Greens has had a huge impact on German and European politics. But not all of Europe is so enthusiastic or willfully naive about dependence on Russian gas. Some countries are looking to America for alternatives.
Russia supplies around one third of the EU's gas, but the proportion rises the farther east you go. The Baltic states and Bulgaria buy all their gas from Russia. In the middle are Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary, dependent for 50% of their gas on Russia.
LINK
Posted on 3/21/14 at 7:35 am to NC_Tigah
You reap what you sow. I hope Eastern Europe enjoys Russian dependence/domination.
Posted on 3/21/14 at 8:23 am to NC_Tigah
The left's successful war on nuclear energy decades ago is one of the idiotic, self-defeating and perplexing things in American history.
Posted on 3/21/14 at 8:51 am to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
The left's successful war on nuclear energy decades ago is one of the idiotic, self-defeating and perplexing things in American history.
Apparently not successful enough to prevent the catastrophe at Fukushima even after the lessons of Chernobyl and Three Mile Island.
Posted on 3/21/14 at 8:52 am to davesdawgs
quote:The broader point is warmists essentially gave Eastern Europe no choice.
I hope Eastern Europe enjoys Russian dependence/domination.
Posted on 3/21/14 at 8:54 am to davesdawgs
quote:
I hope Eastern Europe enjoys Russian dependence/domination.
It's a two-way street. The Russians are just as dependent on the revenue they derive from selling the natural gas, their major export.
This post was edited on 3/21/14 at 8:55 am
Posted on 3/21/14 at 8:55 am to Layabout
quote:
Apparently not successful enough to prevent the catastrophe at Fukushima even after the lessons of Chernobyl and Three Mile Island.
You understand that Fukushima was due to an act of God instead of human error, right?
Posted on 3/21/14 at 8:57 am to TN Bhoy
Well, although I don't think the situations are equatable, the human error was not being prepared for a situation like that. All possible situations should be prepared for.
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:06 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
You understand that Fukushima was due to an act of God instead of human error, right?
There was plenty of human error that was exposed by that act of god. From Wikipedia:
quote:
The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission found the nuclear disaster was "manmade" and that its direct causes were all foreseeable. The report also found that the plant was incapable of withstanding the earthquake and tsunami. TEPCO, regulators Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) and NSC and the government body promoting the nuclear power industry (METI), all failed to meet the most basic safety requirements, such as assessing the probability of damage, preparing for containing collateral damage from such a disaster, and developing evacuation plans. A separate study by Stanford researchers found that Japanese plants operated by the largest utility companies were particularly unprotected against potential tsunamis.
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:51 am to Layabout
Speak softly, carry a big stick, and ride a tanker full of oil?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News