Started By
Message
locked post

Why are we paying for kids up to the age of 26?

Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:52 am
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24755 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:52 am
Aren't these the people who we want paying into the system? The young healthy people are the ones we are depending on to pay for the old and infirm. Adding them to a family policy won't generate as much revenue. How does this make sense?
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:54 am to
And why are we calling people past the age of adulthood kids?
Posted by Thoresten
Member since Nov 2012
156 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:55 am to
Kids up to age 26 vote and its a low enough age to where people wont make too big of a fuss over it.
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55358 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:56 am to
Nowadays so many kids at the age still live at home with their parents. They should be eligible to be on their parents policies.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79707 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:57 am to
quote:

a low enough age to where people wont make too big of a fuss over it.


Dude.

If you're still living at home at 26, I think that can officially be categorized as "failure to launch".
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260774 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:58 am to
LINK

quote:


In 2012, 36% of the nation’s young adults ages 18 to 31—the so-called Millennial generation—were living in their parents’ home, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Why are we paying for kids up to the age of 26?


It's a new reality created by liberal progressives not unlike the new norm for unemployment, food stamps, government dependency in general.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:01 pm to
You are old enough to drink, sign contracts, vote, etc and you still need your mommy and daddy pay for your insurance? Do you need then to cut your meat and wipe your mouth too?

The age 26 regulation is a pure political ploy as is all of this trainwreck.
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37334 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:02 pm to
One can't really answer any of the questions stemming from the ACA in an honest fashion.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39732 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:02 pm to
Probably need to increase that age with the staggeringly awesome Osiah Job Growth.
Posted by Thoresten
Member since Nov 2012
156 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:02 pm to
I understand, but i think they were thinking "whats the highest age we can get away with to where people will start to question this too much"
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79707 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

In 2012, 36% of the nation’s young adults ages 18 to 31—the so-called Millennial generation—were living in their parents’ home, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data


In the case of this particular 36%, also known as the "Hipster slacker/Ill-equipped to take care of myself" generation.
Posted by Col reb 2011
#38
Member since Apr 2013
1614 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:03 pm to
Since your 30's are the new 20's then your 20's should still be on your parents
Posted by BobABooey
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2004
14287 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:04 pm to
Aren't they indirectly paying into the system via their parents' payments? Maybe that's why.
Posted by willthezombie
the graveyard
Member since Dec 2013
1546 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Why are we paying for kids up to the age of 26?


So young voters will ignore the fact that Obama's economy is why they can't get a job or can't get the job that they want (pay, career field, etc.).
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260774 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:07 pm to
quote:


The age 26 regulation is a pure political ploy as is all of this trainwreck


Bingo. Just fishing for votes.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:07 pm to
I'm gonna milk it
Posted by Chimlim
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
17712 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:08 pm to
Just a typical liberal mentality of trying to create more dependency while penalizing responsibility.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36053 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:12 pm to
Why26? Why not 27? 28? 30?

Who chose 26 and why?

Posted by ugasickem
Allatoona
Member since Nov 2010
10789 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:13 pm to
dems trying to buy the young vote
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram