Started By
Message
locked post

Texas isn’t just leading the nation in job growth—it’s doing it more equitably,

Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:00 am
Posted by MisterSenator
Member since Aug 2013
1285 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:00 am
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
32889 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:16 am to
Reading the comments below was entertaining. I had no idea the left had such a strong dislike for Texas.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84856 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:18 am to
quote:

I had no idea the left had such a strong dislike for Texas.


I like Austin but I don't care for the shallow/superficial culture of Dallas or the blandness of Houston. I don't mind Ft. Worth or San Antonio though.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260404 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:20 am to
quote:

I had no idea the left had such a strong dislike for Texas.


Old habits die hard. They're behind the curve.

States with the lowest Gini coefficient are all red states

LINK

Look at the bottom of the list
This post was edited on 3/8/14 at 10:24 am
Posted by geauxtigers585
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
3832 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:22 am to
"You may all go to hell and I will go to Texas"
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:26 am to
quote:

I had no idea the left had such a strong dislike for Texas.


I dislike generalizations...but, I will make one. Please note it is a theory and generalization and cannot be attached to any specific person:


The "left" dislikes rugged individualism. It is much more behind a 'collective' or 'cooperative' viewpoint. The "left" prefers identifying 'groups' and addressing issues with 'group-think' and 'group approach'.


Texas is ARROGANTLY, ruggedly individualism-centric. It is the magnified version of what the "left" dislikes.



Now, obviously, my "left" is an aggregate. As is my "Texas".
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84856 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Gini coefficient


I don't think income inequality is neccessarily a bad thing. After all, income inequality rose in the 90's and that wasn't a problem because every tier saw growth. I think the issue some people have now rightly or wrongly is that the perception is that unlike the 90's, income inequality today is being fueled by the top earners at the expense of everyone else.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79081 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:27 am to
but but but our abortion regulations prevent safe abortions and........"force women to go to Mexico and buy internet drugs which cause undue harm to mothers. It's a War on Poverty and War on Women!" (or so claimed on MPerry)

@ that whole network.

Texas = GOAT
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84856 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:27 am to
quote:

The "left" dislikes rugged individualism


that could not be farther from the truth.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260404 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:28 am to
quote:



I don't think income inequality is neccessarily a bad thing. After all, income inequality rose in the 90's and that wasn't a problem because every tier saw growth. I think the issue some people have now rightly or wrongly is that the perception is that unlike the 90's, income inequality today is being fueled by the top earners at the expense of everyone else.


You would be a liberal unicorn. Income inequality is one of their battle cries.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:29 am to
quote:

that could not be farther from the truth.


meh...what is "truth"? It is my perspective.

In one of YOUR posts above, you lament that the 'top earners are ...'

Why are you against TOP people being TOP individually?
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84856 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:32 am to
quote:

You would be a liberal unicorn. Income inequality is one of their battle cries.



Well I can think for myself and I can see that democratic politicians, people not necessarily committed to the ideal of liberalism, use that as a battle cry to get votes, and the less sophisticated sector of the liberal voting bloc eats it up.

I will say that the type income inequality we're currently experiencing, where wages for many workers remain flat, if continued for another few decades would start to become harmful. But I don't think we're there yet nor do i think it's really a liberal vs conservative issue. There are much bigger forces at work.
This post was edited on 3/8/14 at 10:34 am
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84856 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:33 am to
quote:



meh...what is "truth"? It is my perspective


Thanks Morpheus

quote:

you lament that the 'top earners are ...'


I didn't lament anything, I said this is what the perception is among some people.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260404 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:38 am to
Libs don't hate individualism, they just view it differently, but dislike it from a right wing perspective.

Also, inequality is a leftist staple.

LINK

ALso, libs understand individuality, they do not embrace individualism.

quote:

As much as the two ends of this really very small spectrum might dislike the other, conservatives and liberals share altogether a great deal in common in their views about individualism. As I discussed in “Individuality and Individualism,” individualism actually interferes with the fullest expression of individuality. Individualism is an ideology that celebrates individuals in opposition to the group, a recipe for profound problems both for individuals themselves and for the group. Individuality, on the other hand, is a readily recognizable fact: individuals differ from one another in temperament, taste, abilities, and so on.


quote:

Liberals, on the other hand, acknowledge the impact of social factors such as racism, nativism, and other forms of structural discrimination such as sexism and homophobia. They support governmental measures such as affirmative action, assistance to the poor, and public subsidies to help to alleviate institutional discrimination and historic disadvantages. The underlying logic of liberalism is that there should be a fairer “footrace” in which individuals are not hampered by forces outside of their personal control and are allowed as much as possible to compete as individuals on equal terms with others.


And my favorite

quote:

The political career of Barack Obama is an example in microcosm of this: liberals still largely support Obama on the grounds that he represents a step forward because of his color. Yet Obama only became the darling of key elements of the Democratic Party leadership and larger ruling class power structure because he is willing to sell out those among the oppressed and those who emphasize with the oppressed who see Obama as their champion. White House policy under Obama is only rhetorically different from what a McCain or Romney White House
This post was edited on 3/8/14 at 10:39 am
Posted by MisterSenator
Member since Aug 2013
1285 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:42 am to
quote:

I had no idea the left had such a strong dislike for Texas.


You'd be surprised... Battleground Texas

Conservative Response
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84856 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:46 am to
I agree with most of that. I think mainstream liberalism and the democrats have lost its way a bit under Obama.

Example #1- Bill Clinton balanced the budget, Ronald Reagan and the Republicans were the ones who saw deficit spending as a means to spur the economy for political gain. Now we're right in lock step with them and in the process have lost the moral high ground.

Example #2- Libertarians have largely usurped the social crusade against the police state and government surveillance. Pre-Obama that was a major tenet of the democrats but again they have decided to not speak out once Obama took the oath and subsequently broke all his promises in this area.

There are a lot of other examples of this too. I'm curious to see where the conversation will go in 2016 and beyond.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
32889 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:48 am to
But this article showed growth at all income levels so that wouldn't apply to Texas.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84856 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:50 am to
Okay, and?
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
32889 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:52 am to
So the comments below the article are ridiculous.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84856 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 10:52 am to
i didn't read them.

Dallas still sucks though.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram