Started By
Message
locked post

Fast and Furious Seems Reasonable...

Posted on 2/22/14 at 2:44 am
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 2:44 am
Does anyone really dispute the validity of the idea? Obviously it didn't work, but it sounds like a well reasoned way to track cartels. You can't put bugs on people or track them through other means. The idea of quietly tracking weapons seems very logical. Again, I know that it failed, but was it a crazy idea?

I don't have any real respect for the administration that started the program, or the one that continued it, but it doesn't strike me as a bad idea. Administrations have failed in much more spectacular ways, including such liberal icons as Kennedy and Roosevelt.

The point is that the process didn't work the way that it was supposed to. The idea behind it, to me, seems sound.

Granted, I oppose the war on drugs and the idea that people can't put into their bodies whatever they'd like.
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
21598 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 6:18 am to
I don't believe it. I think it was a payoff or a bribe. We know the NSA was listening to everything. I'm sure they could have been listening to every cartel phone call. And they're not hard to find anyway. We know where they are. They control northern Mexico.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 6:31 am to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89545 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 6:47 am to
quote:

Again, I know that it failed, but was it a crazy idea?



I believe the plan was to use the violence associated with these weapons to justify greater restrictions on Americans' gun rights.

But, setting that aside, it is a terrible, terrible idea for a number of reasons:

1. It is never a good idea to arm the bad guys.

2. It is never a good idea to break your own system.

What do I mean by 2.? I've done threat vulnerability assessments and it is perfectly fine to stress test a system - i.e. I get one of my guys to try to access my facility without proper authorization.

It is quite another thing to get people on the inside of the facility to help him - or worse, tell them all not to worry about it - that deliberately breaks the system.

In this specific case, to specifically break the system in order to arm bad guys - and your own weapons come back and kill your own guys - if it wasn't so tragic, it would be laughable.

Ill-headed, ill-conceived and ill-executed - must be the ATF, right?
This post was edited on 2/22/14 at 6:50 am
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 6:49 am to
Horrible idea from the get go. Its only purpose was a long term push for gun control when these weapons showed up at crime scenes. They got caught. Now dozens of people are dead, directly as a result of a political motive to strip Constitutional Rights.
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
45812 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 7:12 am to
You and Ace have it right. There was never any attempt to track anything and if you remember in the MSM, every night they were talking about gun crime in Mexico, violence and gun control. As soon as F&F broke that all stopped.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48930 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 7:51 am to
I fully believe that Fast and Furious was a black flag from the get go to push the agenda that US made assault weapons were driving gun violence in Mexico to pass anti-gun legislation against law abiding citizens.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48930 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 7:55 am to
quote:

Does anyone really dispute the validity of the idea?


The idea that the agency with the sole responsibility to keep weapons out of the hands of dangerous criminals was in fact circumventing federal law to arm narco-cartels with high powered automatic weapons? That were used to kill no telling how many innocent Mexcians and even border patrol and U.S. law enforcement agents.

Yes I think it was a very reasonable idea
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118823 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 7:58 am to
quote:

I fully believe that Fast and Furious was a black flag from the get go to push the agenda that US made assault weapons were driving gun violence in Mexico to pass anti-gun legislation against law abiding citizens.



I could be wrong, but did not Holder fully admit this and subsequently backtrack his comments?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 8:03 am to
quote:

every night they were talking about gun crime in Mexico, violence and gun control. As soon as F&F broke that all stopped.


Yep. All you heard were how many thousands were being killed. Then find out a couple of massacres, and a ton of school age kids were killed in a mass shooting with one of the weapons they let go, and silence.

Comprehensive timeline by Sharyl Atkisson - best investigative reporter of any MSM

Univision video of their expose on F&F

On January 30, 2010, a commando of at least 20 hit men parked themselves outside a birthday party of high school and college students in Villas de Salvarcar, Ciudad Juarez. Near midnight, the assassins, later identified as hired guns for the Mexican cartel La Linea, broke into a one-story house and opened fire on a gathering of nearly 60 teenagers. Outside, lookouts gunned down a screaming neighbor and several students who had managed to escape. Fourteen young men and women were killed, and 12 more were wounded before the hit men finally fled.

Indirectly, the United States government played a role in the massacre by supplying some of the firearms used by the cartel murderers. Three of the high caliber weapons fired that night in Villas de Salvarcar were linked to a gun tracing operation run by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), according to a Mexican army document obtained exclusively by Univision News.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 8:07 am to
quote:

I could be wrong, but did not Holder fully admit this and subsequently backtrack his comments?


quote:

CBS News investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson report Holder made the difficult admission to Congress. "Any instance of so-called gunwalking is unacceptable. Regrettably, this tactic was used as part of Fast and Furious."


That also means the letter Holder's office sent Congress last February denying gunwalking was wrong.

"What I said was it contains inaccurate information," Holder told Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX).


"Well, isn't that false," Cornyn asked.


"Well false, I don't want to quibble with you," Holder replied. "But false I think implied people making a decision to decieve.



Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48930 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 8:12 am to
The whole idea would be akin to the DEA handing out heroin to cartel dealers.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73446 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 8:14 am to
quote:

I don't have any real respect for the administration that started the program, or the one that continued it,
Wanna bet you voted twice for the administration that you have no respect for?
Posted by Elcid96
Member since May 2010
5465 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 8:23 am to
Bad idea.

Not practical.

Would have to have the help of the host country in Mexico aid in surveillance, good luck . Surveillance in a foreign country that corrupt is not what the movies portray. Whoever came up with this idea clearly never actually worked in that environment.

When this first broke they had a idiot on that claimed they were tracking the weapons only after a crime had been committed. In other words after they found a weapon at a homicide they could trace that weapon back. A even dumber idea.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73446 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Would have to have the help of the host country in Mexico aid in surveillance, good luck .
Well it's even harder when you don't even communicate with the country and keep this "program" secret from Mexico. It's almost as if they didn't want these weapons tracked, gee I wonder why that is?
Posted by Elcid96
Member since May 2010
5465 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 8:26 am to
The media asked all the wrong questions.
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
45812 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 8:27 am to
I don't have time to pull up my old info, but the amount of guns moving into Mexico through straw purchases was not enough to fuel the violence seen in Mexico, but it was a good scapegoat. There were direct sells of guns from the US government to the Mexican government in very high numbers that started after Obama took office. It was known that 20% of these guns would end up immediately in the cartels hands...
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73446 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 8:28 am to
Yeah anyway you slice it this whole thing was a corrupt POS.
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15723 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 8:33 am to
If it would've involved providing and tracking something that couldn't kill people, it would've been a much, much better idea. Horribly foolish program.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112489 posts
Posted on 2/22/14 at 10:12 am to
It was a great idea. We should apply the same concept to Iran. The problem with Iran is we don't know if they're telling the truth about nuclear enrichment just for power generation.

So, we could smuggle a small nuclear bomb to them and if they blow up Israel then we will know for certain that their nuke program is for weapons.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram