Started By
Message
locked post

Anyone just see O'Reilly interview with GOP Rep. Chaffetz?

Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:30 pm
Posted by RidiculousHype
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2007
10201 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:30 pm
Wow. How inept is the GOP? They haven't even tried to get Panetta in to testify. And he is the key guy to the whole thing. Un freaking believable.
Posted by Socratics
Virginia Beach
Member since Dec 2013
2463 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:35 pm to
I haven't seen the interview ,but I would love to know what they are trying to get Panetta to testify for.

*Not being a dick, I really want to know
Posted by TupeloTiger
Tupelo,Ms.[via Bastrop,La.]
Member since Jul 2004
4340 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:37 pm to
General Hamm got the call, he told Panetta that night right before they went into the White House to tell Obama. Obama knew everything that night. He lied to the nation. His whole Chicago corrupt staff lied about it. I never thought it was Hillary Clinton, it was Obama all along. That's the big secret being kept in this whole time.
This post was edited on 2/6/14 at 7:44 pm
Posted by infantry1026
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2010
6040 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:40 pm to
I watched it, and was fricking pissed that Panetta hasn't even been placed under oath yet. Although the WH has attempted to block individuals from testifying about Benghazi in the past.

I do like that Oreilly took him to task about it though.
Posted by RidiculousHype
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2007
10201 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:46 pm to
Chaffetz serves on the House oversight committee investigating Benghazi. Oreilly asked him why they haven't tried to get Panetta in to testify. Chaffetz had no answer and sounded just as evasive as Obama last Sunday. Pathetic.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90599 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:48 pm to
Behind closed doors, they are all in it together.

Our Government officials are a cancer and it won't change until all of the cancer is cut out.

If you cut out half of a cancerous tumor, it just grows right back.
Posted by RidiculousHype
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2007
10201 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:49 pm to
Just realized I didn't answer your question Been a long day.

Reason why Panetta is important - Ham told Panetta it was a terror attack that night. Panetta went in to talk to Obama right after that. If Panetta testifies that he told Obama it was a planned terrorist attack, this story will explode.
Posted by NHTIGER
Central New Hampshire
Member since Nov 2003
16188 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

General Hamm got the call, he told Panetta that night right before they went into the White House to tell Obama.


General Ham did not go to the White House that afternoon with Secretary Panetta.

General Dempsey did.

Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

Our Government officials are a cancer and it won't change until all of the cancer is cut out.



The problem is much deeper than government officials, who are predictable in their efforts at self preservation.

The ELECTORATE is the problem.
Posted by Socratics
Virginia Beach
Member since Dec 2013
2463 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Chaffetz serves on the House oversight committee investigating Benghazi. Oreilly asked him why they haven't tried to get Panetta in to testify. Chaffetz had no answer and sounded just as evasive as Obama last Sunday. Pathetic.


I honestly don't have any idea why he wouldn't at least ask Panetta. I see no reason why he would want to cover for Obama or Clinton. A Republican should be licking his chops for a chance to stick it to both of them considering how long its has been in the news. He can't be that incompetent. Does he know something we don't know?
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90599 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

The ELECTORATE is the problem.


Partially. If the MSM would report the news equally on both sides and aggressively attack the corruption in D.C. then people would start to wake up.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45752 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:55 pm to
Saw it. Panetta currently scared shitless and looking for drones.
Posted by NHTIGER
Central New Hampshire
Member since Nov 2003
16188 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:55 pm to
For the record, Secretary Panetta did testify about that 9-11-12 White House visit in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee exactly one year ago, along with General Dempsey. They testified together, just as they went to the White House and discussed the attack with Obama together.

O'Reilly was not even aware that Dempsey was present in that meeting the entire time right alongside Panetta.
Posted by Manky
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2013
1145 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Panetta currently scared shitless


I doubt that.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123896 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

How inept is the GOP?
EXTREMELY !

Issa has been so disappointing he should be kicked off of leadership.
Posted by Socratics
Virginia Beach
Member since Dec 2013
2463 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

For the record, Secretary Panetta did testify about that 9-11-12 White House visit in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee exactly one year ago, along with General Dempsey. They testified together, just as they went to the White House and discussed the attack with Obama together.

O'Reilly was not even aware that Dempsey was present in that meeting the entire time right alongside Panetta.



Now I want to watch the interview. Did both O'Reilly and Chaffetz forget that he was interviewed a year ago?


Video of Panetta testimony
Posted by NHTIGER
Central New Hampshire
Member since Nov 2003
16188 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

I haven't seen the interview ,but I would love to know what they are trying to get Panetta to testify for.

*Not being a dick, I really want to know




General Ham told General Dempsey and Secy. Panetta at the Pentagon that it was a terrorist attack, according to Ham.

What is being discussed is whether Panetta and/or Dempsey repeated that information when they met with Obama at the White House for 30 minutes at 5 PM Eastern time (one hour and 40 minutes after the attack began) on Sept. 11th.

Dempsey could answer the question just as easily as Panetta can.

Neither man was asked that specific question when they testified about their activities on 9-11-12 before the Senate Armed Services Committee one year ago. Several senators grilled them hard, but at that time the question of whether they knew it was a terrorist attack had not yet been raised in the media.

By the way, both the Secretary of State and the Joint Chief of Staff both left the White House at 5:30 PM and returned to the Pentagon together.

Throughout the rest of the entire night, NEITHER MAN HAD ANY CONTACT WITH THE PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF.

THAT is stunning...
Posted by NHTIGER
Central New Hampshire
Member since Nov 2003
16188 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

Did both O'Reilly and Chaffetz forget that he was interviewed a year ago?



Would not surprise me if O'Reilly had no clue about it.

Chaffetz would have been aware that the Senate got an "audience" with Panetta and Dempsey, but that his own House committee has not.

Posted by jb4
Member since Apr 2013
12655 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:21 pm to
My theory is Speaker boehner was briefed on some covert CIA operation running out of there before the shite hit the fan. Such an operation was a big no-no according to the UN, thus the repubs won't investigate anything. The irony is if Bush was running such operation the media, law profs, and congress would be demanding impeachment for breaking international law. Yet, its CYA for everybody.
This post was edited on 2/6/14 at 8:26 pm
Posted by NHTIGER
Central New Hampshire
Member since Nov 2003
16188 posts
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

My theory is Speaker boehner was briefed on some covert CIA operation running out of there before the shite hit the fan. Such an operation was a big no-no according to the UN, thus the repubs won't investigate anything






There is absolutely nothing that supports that opinion, with regard to Boehner.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram