- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
land access question: can you cross at a "caddycorner"?
Posted on 1/20/14 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 1/20/14 at 12:12 pm
on some WMAs there is property that is part of the WMA that is only connected at a corner to another part of the WMA (caddycorner). is it safe to assume that you can cross at these corners without trespassing?
4
Posted on 1/20/14 at 12:20 pm to gorillacoco
In oil and gas law adjacent properties only joined by a corner are considered contiguous.
I don't know how that goes for access as they only touch less than a centimeter wide, and you are well , probably wider than a centimeter.
I don't know how that goes for access as they only touch less than a centimeter wide, and you are well , probably wider than a centimeter.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 12:22 pm to gorillacoco
You have to jump from one parcel to the other. If you don't, you will be trespassing.
(not legal advice)
(not legal advice)
Posted on 1/20/14 at 12:24 pm to TigerDeacon
jump, jump...
Posted on 1/20/14 at 12:38 pm to gorillacoco
No problem at all (as long as you don't get caught).
As stated before, properties that meet at a corner are NOT contiguous. (At least, that is what I believe that TClayboy meant to write) There would need to be some sort of "right of passage" agreement to traverse between the two tracts.
Plus, we are assuming that you could even correctly identify where the exact location of the corner is out in the woods.
As stated before, properties that meet at a corner are NOT contiguous. (At least, that is what I believe that TClayboy meant to write) There would need to be some sort of "right of passage" agreement to traverse between the two tracts.
Plus, we are assuming that you could even correctly identify where the exact location of the corner is out in the woods.
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 1/20/14 at 12:48 pm to Cubssfan
i just don't think the game warden would enforce it as such. otherwise why would these properties be included on the WMA?
Posted on 1/20/14 at 1:10 pm to gorillacoco
Lac Ophelia has two corners like that with a Dr. McCann road running between them. I was always too chicken to cross that road.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 1:12 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
I was always too chicken to cross that road.
Puss.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 1:16 pm to AlxTgr
that spot is waaaay wider than a road. more like 75' or so, plus, it takes so long to get to the other side, almost no point in going there.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 1:21 pm to Mung
quote:It's two corners that meet. It takes way longer to get there the other way, plus you're spooking the heck out of errything on that side.
that spot is waaaay wider than a road. more like 75' or so, plus, it takes so long to get to the other side, almost no point in going there.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 1:56 pm to Cubssfan
quote:
As stated before, properties that meet at a corner are NOT contiguous. (At least, that is what I believe that TClayboy meant to write)
Yes. I'm glad you caught that. The properties touch, but only theoretically. There is no unit of measure to explain the distance or width of a corner.
There is not a hard yes or no answer, but the fact is nothing could pass through there as it is less than paper thin wide.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 1:59 pm to gorillacoco
quote:
i just don't think the game warden would enforce it as such
Bull.
quote:
otherwise why would these properties be included on the WMA?
The properties are real and hold real value. They can be included in the same WMA and not touch at all (miles apart). It is just that of the example you are talking about you would have to exit one side via road, drive around, and access the other parcel from another road or servitude of passage even though they arguably touch one another.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:02 pm to Clyde Tipton
Pole vault? Rope swing?
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:03 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Pole vault? Rope swing?
Genius.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:23 pm to Clyde Tipton
There is no other means of access though, other than by going through private land.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News