- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Am I the only one who enjoys "Warrior" more than "The Fighter"?
Posted on 1/7/14 at 6:43 pm
Posted on 1/7/14 at 6:43 pm
As the years have passed...
I just feel that Warrior is the superior movie.
The ending scene gets me every time.
I just feel that Warrior is the superior movie.
The ending scene gets me every time.
11
Posted on 1/7/14 at 6:48 pm to Rittdog
I really liked both a lot, for different reasons. As far as why I like sports movies, the struggle to be the best, Warrior was superior.
Posted on 1/7/14 at 6:48 pm to Rittdog
I think it has more rewatchablitiy.
Posted on 1/7/14 at 6:49 pm to Rittdog
I think Warrior is a better story with a better ending, but Bale's performance is the best of the two.
Overall, I also prefer Warrior.
Overall, I also prefer Warrior.
Posted on 1/7/14 at 6:59 pm to SwaggerCopter
quote:
t Bale's performance is the best of the two.
Bale was phenomenal.
But Hardy and Nick Nolte were not that far off.
Hardy had such a believability factor when he was playing that role.
I guess Bale was technically better in his movie. But when I watched both films recently.....I said "wow, Bale is doing a tremendous job"....when I watched Warrior I said "Man.....Tommy is one hardcore dude"
Posted on 1/7/14 at 7:02 pm to Rittdog
Both were really good. They were different in my opinion. hard to compare
Posted on 1/7/14 at 7:02 pm to Rittdog
I actually didn't even realize that Tom Hardy was in the movie the first time I watched it, which goes to show what an actor he is.
Posted on 1/7/14 at 7:04 pm to Rittdog
It's close. I think Bale's performance and the tad better directing gives Fighter the edge as far as superior movie goes .. given the choice between the two I'd rather watch Warrior again though. Hardy and Nolte are gut-wrenching in their performances. I didn't expect that movie to get to me the way it did; really good film.
Posted on 1/7/14 at 7:04 pm to Rittdog
Both are great, but I prefer Warrior.
Posted on 1/7/14 at 7:14 pm to Rittdog
Warrior is a better movie IMO
The Fighter would've been meh if it weren't for Bale.
The Fighter would've been meh if it weren't for Bale.
Posted on 1/7/14 at 7:23 pm to tigerfan84
The Fighter is superior in every way. Bale, Amy Adams, Melissa Leo were on top of their game.
Come on, that last fight in Warrior was so cheesy and predictable plus it was downright terrible. Prior to that, the movie was really good.
Come on, that last fight in Warrior was so cheesy and predictable plus it was downright terrible. Prior to that, the movie was really good.
This post was edited on 1/7/14 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 1/7/14 at 7:26 pm to Rittdog
No
Posted on 1/7/14 at 8:15 pm to Rittdog
It is better.
But that was the first thing one of my friends told me after he saw it.
But that was the first thing one of my friends told me after he saw it.
Posted on 1/8/14 at 8:55 am to SwaggerCopter
quote:
I actually didn't even realize that Tom Hardy was in the movie the first time I watched it, which goes to show what an actor he is.
Posted on 1/8/14 at 8:56 am to Rittdog
quote:
Am I the only one who enjoys "Warrior" more than "The Fighter"?
No...I feel the same way.
Posted on 1/8/14 at 8:59 am to Rittdog
every time i go to watch Warrior i see it's 2 and a half hours and I can't watch it
Posted on 1/8/14 at 9:17 am to Byron Bojangles III
Both are great movies but warrior gets the nod for me
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News