- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Officials, please explain this to me
Posted on 12/7/13 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 12/7/13 at 3:51 pm
Earlier in the Ok vs Ok St. game, with about 1 minute left in the game, there is no replay of an apparent INT, yet with 10 min left in the half of TX vs Baylor, the replay official calls down to the field to review an apparent fumble, even after the snap of the next play?
Wow
Wow
2
Posted on 12/7/13 at 3:52 pm to wahoocs
After the snap? How long after the snap? I think the whistle "starts" when the referee picks up his hand to blow the whistle
Posted on 12/7/13 at 3:52 pm to wahoocs
OU hurried and got the next play in.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 4:02 pm to castorinho
Baylor actually attmepted a pass incomplete, and the Big 12 officials reviewed the play before.
Same conference officials didn't stop play to review on apparent INT with clock already stopped.
Just no consistency.
Especially when there's less than 2 min in the game deciding your conference championship.
I don't get it.
Same conference officials didn't stop play to review on apparent INT with clock already stopped.
Just no consistency.
Especially when there's less than 2 min in the game deciding your conference championship.
I don't get it.
Posted on 12/7/13 at 4:05 pm to wahoocs
Many variables in play. Was the replay system working at the time? Did the replay official see enough from one replay that he didn't need to stop play and see the others?
Posted on 12/7/13 at 4:12 pm to BamaDude06
Well, I can attempt to explain away the earlier call too.
Maybe Gundy should have used one of his 3 TO's to reveiw, etc.
But when the same conference has their replay official stop the game after a play has been completely run to review the play before, and it's in the first half later in the day, with the same conference championship on the line, I'm confused.
Why wouldn't the replay official in the first game automatically review such a big play? I mean, it's the same conference, with teams playing for the same championship, only this time it was even at a much more critical time in the game.
Just seems so arbitrary.
Maybe Gundy should have used one of his 3 TO's to reveiw, etc.
But when the same conference has their replay official stop the game after a play has been completely run to review the play before, and it's in the first half later in the day, with the same conference championship on the line, I'm confused.
Why wouldn't the replay official in the first game automatically review such a big play? I mean, it's the same conference, with teams playing for the same championship, only this time it was even at a much more critical time in the game.
Just seems so arbitrary.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News