- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is this what college football is supposed to be?
Posted on 11/4/13 at 12:45 am
Posted on 11/4/13 at 12:45 am
To have The #1 recruiting class every year and dominate everybody? And if you don't do that you shouldn't think about being competitive? I was just reading the article by Harris in the advocate and he says "We can parse out all the aspects of impending doom, but this space is limited." OMG, 99.9% of college football players should stop thinking about being competitive, what a piece of junk he wrote.
This post was edited on 11/4/13 at 12:48 am
6
Posted on 11/4/13 at 12:56 am to CalTiger53
Bama can sign the number 1 recruiting class 10 years in a row for all I give a shite. They still struggle against us year by year and fail to beat us in their own house. 
Posted on 11/4/13 at 1:06 am to CalTiger53
National Championships are all that matter. If you cannot lace up and compete for one every year then go back to playing intramural sports.
Posted on 11/4/13 at 1:12 am to CalTiger53
There were three 10-0 (ND, K-State, Oregon) teams ahead of Alabama last year. Stanford converted a 4th down to force OT and eventually beat Oregon. We were one busted play away from having the Ducks as national champs last year.
TL;DR - As good as the gumps are, even they need the dice to roll their way.
TL;DR - As good as the gumps are, even they need the dice to roll their way.
Posted on 11/4/13 at 1:46 am to TheBuescherMan
is seems it always rolls their way
Posted on 11/4/13 at 1:52 am to weinrib
quote:
National Championships are all that matter. If you cannot lace up and compete for one every year then go back to playing intramural sports.
So you think Stanford and Oregon are playing intramural sports?
Posted on 11/4/13 at 1:57 am to CalTiger53
quote:Effectively yes. The PAC-12 has been so weak for so long they don't much matter. It's like a bunch of fraternities playing each other and no one really cares. Until USCw rises to the top again and/or the SEC significantly falters that is unlikely to change. Harvard-Yale is more interesting than Stanford-Oregon.
So you think Stanford and Oregon are playing intramural sports?
Posted on 11/4/13 at 2:16 am to weinrib
quote:
National Championships are all that matter. If you cannot lace up and compete for one every year then go back to playing intramural sports.
I hope that was sarcasm.
Posted on 11/4/13 at 2:30 am to ByteMe
No sarcasm. If you cannot be the best at what you do, then go do something else.
Posted on 11/4/13 at 2:42 am to weinrib
quote:So... like 98% of the world should just kill themselves?
No sarcasm. If you cannot be the best at what you do, then go do something else.
Posted on 11/4/13 at 2:43 am to FT
ETA: Make that 99.999999999999%
ETA: This wasn't an edit.
ETA: This wasn't an edit.
This post was edited on 11/4/13 at 3:41 am
Posted on 11/4/13 at 2:47 am to FT
What a beautiful planet this would be once again if they did.
Posted on 11/4/13 at 2:56 am to weinrib
quote:
Effectively yes. The PAC-12 has been so weak for so long they don't much matter. It's like a bunch of fraternities playing each other and no one really cares. Until USCw rises to the top again and/or the SEC significantly falters that is unlikely to change. Harvard-Yale is more interesting than Stanford-Oregon.
I just laugh at people who say they want Oregon to play bama because they think Oregon would beat em
Posted on 11/4/13 at 3:16 am to kc8876
On Oregon's best day and Alabama's worst anything could happen.
Posted on 11/4/13 at 3:29 am to weinrib
name the teams that are in the running every year for the nat. championship......im talking no down years and teams that have a legit shot at it every single year....where I believe that as a team your goal should be a title every year there is no team except for one that was a legit contender the last four years....and that team didn't even win their conference in 2011...
This post was edited on 11/4/13 at 3:34 am
Posted on 11/4/13 at 3:50 am to weinrib
quote:
On Oregon's best day and Alabama's worst anything could happen.
That's right
Posted on 11/4/13 at 6:39 am to weinrib
quote:
If you cannot lace up and compete for one every year
Actually, I don't completely disagree with this. If you were to say that unless you are willing or able to put the resources and effort in to trying to build a team that is good enough to compete for a BCS championship then your team should not be in division 1. I think this would only leave about 20 to 40 teams in division 1.
And then I would require division 1 schools to only play division 1 schools.
Posted on 11/4/13 at 6:49 am to mauser
hate to inform some of you buty Oregon would have beaten Bama last year. And i think if the teams meet this year, Oregon will win. Weve seen Ole Nicky struggle two years in arow with A&M and Johnny Boy. Oregons offense is better.. way better.
Posted on 11/4/13 at 6:51 am to weinrib
quote:Dear child, college football is a business. Business is about making money, not about making champions.
National Championships are all that matter. If you cannot lace up and compete for one every year then go back to playing intramural sports.
Posted on 11/4/13 at 7:47 am to CalTiger53
For me, college football is entertainment.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News