Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected | Page 7 | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
BaBaDoo
Member since Aug 2011
203 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


I never said I was kidding. I said I thought it was 3rd down. But you're all just whining and bitching like females, thus the jokes.

Why are you trying to put a damper on things Drew?
She still loves you as a friend, the kids will turn out fine.






Back to top
BaBaDoo
Member since Aug 2011
203 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


I believe the point y'all made was that a timeout should've been called.

The point I made was that it may have killed some SUPER SLIM chance we had anyway, but that isn't why we lost. Of all the things that happened y'all bitch about this. What about starting to use Hunter a lot on the 1st 2 downs just recently? Waiting till the end of the game to put Louis in? Calling deep shots when we could've dinked and dunked to a 3 td victory?

But no, you want to bitch about a timeout that DIDN'T frickING MATTER






Back to top
GeauxxxTigers23
USA Fan
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
24715 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


quote:

BaBaDoo


You are dumb.

You are not funny.

You need to consider drinking a glass of bleach.






Back to top
BaBaDoo
Member since Aug 2011
203 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


I am in no way defending Les. Coaching other than the offense until now, has been poor all year. Raymond can't teach technique apparently and Chavis has pussy gameplans.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
BaBaDoo
Member since Aug 2011
203 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


You're a virgin.

You like visors.

WHERE IS THE REST OF YOUR HAT?!?






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Drew Orleans
LSU Fan
Member since Mar 2010
19332 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


We're bitching about all of it.

The most brain dead fricking move of the game was the no call then late call TO. It is and always will be inexcusable. Les is stupid.






Back to top
PurpleAndGold86
LSU Fan
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2012
10792 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


quote:

Who cares? We were fricking terrible the entire game.



So we should just give up? What a retarded comment. You also say the odds weren't necessarily any better for getting down the field than the kicker missing. Well the chances for a block and the kid missing were the EXACT same whether there were 25 seconds or 6 seconds on the clock, so why the frick not give yourself a few seconds to try something??






Back to top
  Replies (0)
BaBaDoo
Member since Aug 2011
203 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


In 6 months you've made 8000 posts on a message board bro. Get at me.





Back to top
BaBaDoo
Member since Aug 2011
203 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


NO IT WASN'T
This is my point exactly. You're going to sum up a football game on one hypothetical scenario. YOU ARE DUMB

I'd vote on either of the throws that were picked in the end zone.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
RCDfan1950
LSU Fan
United States
Member since Feb 2007
11245 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


quote:

Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


We've got one of the best KO return guys in the nation. He'd have been pumped with adrenaline.

Rationalizations aside...INDEFENSIBLE.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
GeauxxxTigers23
USA Fan
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
24715 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


quote:

In 6 months you've made 8000 posts on a message board bro. Get at me.



I have no life. Hence the reason for my 8000 awesome posts.


You are an idiot. Hence the reason for your 62 retarded posts.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
3606 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


Well, we're talking fractions of a percent.

But still, isn't a .1% chance of winning better than .01%?

Why throw away a one in a thousand chance for a 1 in ten thousand?

FOR ABSOLUTELY NO REASON.

It was painfully obvious that calling a timeout to give yourself a few plays was better than not, yet no timeout, that's just inexcusable, even if it only made a small mathetmatical difference.






Back to top
themunch
LSU Fan
At home/ at work/ it's all the same
Member since Jan 2007
11660 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


Was it third down or fourth down?





Back to top
  Replies (0)
TigerJeff
LSU Fan
the Emerald Coast
Member since Oct 2006
9188 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


I predict a 64 percent better chance of success in UGA and OM games if the defense had rushed the QB w/ more than 4 players.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
airbornetiger
LSU Fan
DC
Member since Sep 2006
995 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


Crazy thought....but part of me thinks the no time out was deliberate. METT had 3 INTs and had not played well the past 2 weeks. Had Les called TO n we lost (which we would have done) the heat would have been on Mett and the young D....by not calling the TO the heat all becomes directed toward him and not his players---now his players refocus and rally on the field to defend Miles.....CLM IS NOT as dumb as you all think he is--after all he is making $4M a year.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Topwater Trout
LSU Fan
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
38840 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


Well let's see what could have happened...

1. Missed FG
2. Blocked FG
3. Penalty on ole miss- retry FG
4. Bobbled snap
5. Made FG

4 out of the 5 are good for lsu. Calling TO with 6 seconds would make almost all of them meaningless.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
SBC
LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2005
4006 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


Less than 1%





Back to top
  Replies (0)
mojoebigdog
LSU Fan
louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
77 posts

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


We understand but how many games will it take our head coach to learn managing clock is important part of game. The guy makes millions of dollars a year with a first class staff. Do we forget that same issue happened few years ago in Oxford.





Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top