- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is "bad angles" the new "Short side" option?
Posted on 9/12/13 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 9/12/13 at 12:52 pm
More angles talked about on here than a rocket scientist convention. I believe the bad angles have a lot more to do with others responsibilities braking down than it is a case of just not knowing where to run. Much like our inability to run the option had zero to do with short or wide side.
Maybe the short side problem was really an angle problem.
Maybe the short side problem was really an angle problem.
5
Posted on 9/12/13 at 12:53 pm to tigerfoot
I have a want for geometry majors
Posted on 9/12/13 at 1:00 pm to therick711
Well that's like your opinion. I didn't open the link but I am betting bad angles on D
Posted on 9/12/13 at 1:05 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
Is "bad angles" the new "Short side" option?
More like the new "got to get the tight end involved in the throwing game".
Posted on 9/12/13 at 1:08 pm to Choupique19
Proper execution of the option does require an understanding of angles.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 1:11 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
Is "bad angles" the new "Short side" option?
Posted on 9/12/13 at 1:12 pm to Choupique19
quote:
"got to get the tight end involved in the throwing game".
^This.... And why don't we do moar screens and other passes to the running backs?
Posted on 9/12/13 at 1:17 pm to BRAVEFART
quote:
^This.... And why don't we do moar screens and other passes to the running backs?
Because when a team is stacking the box, you don't attack the flats and shallow middle, you attack the seams. That's why we have two receivers who have 400 yards receiving. When the flat's open up, you'll also see a more effective running game for the same reason.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 1:28 pm to therick711
quote:
Because when a team is stacking the box, you don't attack the flats and shallow middle, you attack the seams.
Last year we kept trying to attack 8 men in the box with quick slants. Dumb! If a team has two safeties at 8 yards, they are right in the path of the slant route.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 1:30 pm to Choupique19
quote:
Last year we kept trying to attack 8 men in the box with quick slants. Dumb! If a team has two safeties at 8 yards, they are right in the path of the slant route.
Amen. Which is why everyone was killing our slant routes. South Carolina almost made us pay with a pick 6. I believe Northern Tejas did the same in the opener, though they ran it down to inside the 10 before being pushed out of bounds.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 1:40 pm to Choupique19
quote:No, it's OBJ's drops/poor hands.
Is "bad angles" the new "Short side" option?
More like the new "got to get the tight end involved in the throwing game".
Posted on 9/12/13 at 1:41 pm to therick711
I was being sarcastic. I'm thrilled with our "new" offense this year. In Cam I trust.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:47 pm to BRAVEFART
I caught it 
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:56 pm to tigerfoot
Remember this oldie but goodie "Give it to Tommy!!!"(Banks)...
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:58 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
braking down
Posted on 9/12/13 at 4:02 pm to kc8876
I call your typo boom, and I raise you a "we can't find a secondary receiver on a screen", and a Welter"takes himself out of every play"
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News