Started By
Message
locked post

Life Insurance - What is the "right" amount / type?

Posted on 8/24/13 at 10:06 am
Posted by Sternocleidomastoid
La Northshore
Member since Apr 2010
214 posts
Posted on 8/24/13 at 10:06 am
I have been term...incremental savings vs. whole, etc. can be invested for greater return than value of whole... well, that is how I was taught anyways. Thoughts...?

I have 4-5X annual earnings. No science here. Want to cover for mortgage / annual expenses for period of time for family (of 4 w/2 grade school age) but not give my wife any nasty ideas (kidding). Thoughts...?

Thanks...
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39856 posts
Posted on 8/24/13 at 10:14 am to
Getting ready to buy a new term life policy right now.

Deciding on the amount like this:

1- Pay off all debt including mortgage
2- Provide enough money for kids to complete school (elementary+high+in-state college)
3- Provide 50-60k of annual income to my wife based on 5 - 6% return.

The idea is if I croak tomorrow my wife and kids have a roof over their heads that they don't have to worry about and she can continue to manage their lives through college without having to go to work.

I know all the arguments about keep the mortgage at low rates vs pay it off and for my peace of mind, if God forbid something else would happen later (major medical, wife get's cancer, kid gets sick, etc) they don't have the drumbeat of a mortgage payment over their heads.

Anyway, that's what I'm doing. Your mileage may vary.
Posted by Lookin4Par
Mandeville, LA
Member since Jun 2012
1232 posts
Posted on 8/24/13 at 10:53 am to
I have 750k for term till I'm 80. I hope to be completely self insured by 40 and cancel the policy.
Posted by LSUgolf04
Member since Aug 2009
349 posts
Posted on 8/24/13 at 11:30 am to
term till 80... the rate will go up before then
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89480 posts
Posted on 8/24/13 at 11:43 am to
quote:

I have been term...incremental savings vs. whole, etc. can be invested for greater return than value of whole... well, that is how I was taught anyways. Thoughts...?


The younger the person, the more likely a whole life option might make sense - you get the immediate death protection, don't have quite the gross income to protect (although tons of time). However, it is not a terribly good value over time - particularly the older you are when you get into the policy - you're betting against yourself, essentially.

I would say something like the mid-30s is the cut off and you should buy level term, death protection insurance. I don't see anything wrong with your 4-5x annual earnings, except, you get to 40 and top six figures of income, your widow and children will have to deal with that multiple for a long time. I'm pretty sure 10x to 12x is going to be the number that everyone will start to suggest is prudent - at that point.

Group can be inexpensive if you have access to it - but, unlike level term, those rates start to increase precipitously when you hit higher age brackets. I have only group myself, but I know there will come a day in the next 4 years I will have to switch some or all of that to level term for the final run.
Posted by 756
Member since Sep 2004
14853 posts
Posted on 8/24/13 at 1:36 pm to
5-7 times income

nothing but term- buy the longest term you can afford
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34863 posts
Posted on 8/24/13 at 3:49 pm to
What meaxjeaux said was a good way to calculate amount.

You can use the rule of thumb calculations, but honestly that is just taking an easy way out of doing some real calculations for your family.

As far as the type. Nobody here is going to be able to tell you the best type without digging deeper into your situation. Term insurance is the simple answer as everyone at some point has a need for term insurance, however there are situations where WL makes sense. Finances aren't a one size fits all answer.

If you want to really know if your family is covered, go talk to an agent (a good one). They will help. Sure take what they say with a grain of salt, as they are salesmen, however they do know what they are talking about (usually).
Posted by 756
Member since Sep 2004
14853 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 12:39 pm to
show me one example where whole life is the best choice
Posted by ItNeverRains
37069
Member since Oct 2007
25397 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 12:42 pm to
Just get 1M 20 year term, I did this at 35, it's like $750/yr through Hartford.
Posted by BARNEYSTINSON
Member since Oct 2011
772 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 1:20 pm to
If you aren't only trying to cover debt and loss of human capital expenses, but also legacy planning.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34863 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 1:20 pm to
Estate planning in an ILIT is one instance.

If you put term inside an ILIT, I will laugh at you.

Satisfied?


But that is way too specific. If I hear someone say that buying term is the correct way 100% of the time, I will determine they have just as little knowledge of the subject as someone who says WL is the best 100% of the time.
This post was edited on 8/27/13 at 1:31 pm
Posted by 756
Member since Sep 2004
14853 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 2:03 pm to
You will have a difficult time convincing the majority of financial planners that WL is the best path

Neither do I think most estate attorneys will back up your perspective

An ILIT is not the best practice for most estates unless you happen to be in the small minority that is worth tens of millions of dollars-

You are just trying to bypass probate processing

So I will give that in 1-2% of estates you may be correct

Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34863 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

You will have a difficult time convincing the majority of financial planners that WL is the best path


Not really, but that wasn't the question either. An ILIT may not be the best tool for an individual's estate plan. You asked me to point out where WL is better than term though.

quote:

Neither do I think most estate attorneys will back up your perspective


I know plenty who have one however, there is also a reason than many attorneys don't recommend doing an ILIT, an it is a similar reason to why many of you says insurance agents push WL.

:
quote:

So I will give that in 1-2% of estates you may be correct


I'll just roll with your numbers there, but I have just disproven the notion that WL is never a better option than term.
This post was edited on 8/27/13 at 3:28 pm
Posted by toots-N-scoots
Houston
Member since Aug 2012
699 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:24 pm to
GoCrazyAuburn-

You will NEVER EVER NEVER win this argument with some on this board, they just don't want to admit that financial planning should include good insurance planning. I always love this question because all of the termites come out. Thankfully the estate planning attorney that I use must be dumb because she sends a lot of referrals my way for permanent insurance planning. Furthermore I guess I'm fortunate that the business owners that I deal with must be dumb as well cause they overwhelming choose owning something versus renting it from me.
Hell just last month a guy that could buy and sell me bought another permanent life policy from me after the first one he bought for buy/sell coverage became paid up with a little over 1.2 million in cash value and 5 million in DB after 10 years of payments. But I guess term is the only solution and he was just sold a bill of goods by me and the estate planning attorney and his CPA.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34863 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

You will NEVER EVER NEVER win this argument




I know. Been posting here long enough to realize that, but doesn't mean I will give up making the argument, if nothing more than to give the counterpoint so the person with the question will at least have it.
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 10:37 pm to
Never buy WL.

According to the SmartMoney website, commissions typically eat up 100 percent of the premium for the first year. On average life insurance agents make about a 30-70% commission on term life insurance, and around 90-105% commission on whole life products. You do the math.

Its better to buy term, and start your own investments. Roll over those 1st year dividends, that dont exist in WL policies
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34863 posts
Posted on 8/27/13 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

Never buy WL.


why not? Why are there zero instances where WL should be used? If you can answer this question, you are smarter than most executives of the largest banks in our country, and should be running them instead.

quote:

average life insurance agents make about a 30-70% commission on term life insurance, and around 90-105% commission on whole life products


I'm curious about this. I would love to see where these stats come, as I've seen them thrown around before. I've yet to encounter a company pay me a different commission for the type of policy. Not saying it doesn't happen, just that I haven't seen it. It would be very interesting to see it listed out by company.


quote:

Its potentially better to buy term, and start your own investments


Fify
This post was edited on 8/27/13 at 11:23 pm
Posted by toots-N-scoots
Houston
Member since Aug 2012
699 posts
Posted on 8/28/13 at 10:07 am to
If they are getting paid 30-70% they are absolutely getting hosed or they are not good at all. My lowest term payout is 95%.

And again please quit using absolutes when giving advice. The best advice to anyone is for them to sit down with a good financial planner who is in for the long term with their clients and develop a person or family specific plan based on that persons life.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34863 posts
Posted on 8/28/13 at 11:49 am to
quote:

If they are getting paid 30-70% they are absolutely getting hosed or they are not good at all. My lowest term payout is 95%.


I know of plenty who pay less than 95% on term, however I know the % is the same regardless of term or WL. For the bigger companies, NYL isn't 95% and is decently lower I think and NML is one of the lower % in the market iirc. However, they do pay higher renewals than some.

quote:

And again please quit using absolutes when giving advice. The best advice to anyone is for them to sit down with a good financial planner who is in for the long term with their clients and develop a person or family specific plan based on that persons life.

This post was edited on 8/28/13 at 11:50 am
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 8/28/13 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

You will NEVER EVER NEVER win this argument with some on this board


I think he just did.

Another question for Auburn. You have mentioned that Guaranteed UL is not so guranteed. Can you please explain that to me?

BOLI is also another instance where permanent insurance is better than term.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram