Bregman earns National Shortstop of Year Award | Page 4 | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Broham
LSU Fan
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2005
14593 posts

re: Bregman earns National Shortstop of Year Award


I agree





Back to top
  Replies (0)
catholictigerfan
LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
40391 posts
 Online 

re: Bregman earns National Shortstop of Year Award


even though me may not be the best bregs is still a beast and only a freshman.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
deuce985
LSU Fan
Member since Feb 2008
13709 posts

re: Bregman earns National Shortstop of Year Award


Bregman was shaky defensively at the beginning of the year and as the season went on he looked great then his glove dipped at the end again. He has the ability to make great plays defensively because he's shown he can make some really tough throws. He just needs to get more consistent and he will. His fundamentals are weird at times and I think it has a lot to do he didn't really play the position before coming to LSU. People are spoiled with Nola. Nola was basically a golden glove. You're not going to get guys that good defensively all the time. Bregman will definitely get better and I'm willing to bet we'll be calling him a great defensive SS by the end of next season too.





Back to top
LSU 318 LSU
Notre Dame Fan
El Cerrito Place
Member since Jan 2011
2866 posts

re: Bregman earns National Shortstop of Year Award


This Bregman kid is good at baseball





Back to top
  Replies (0)
TigahRag
Texas A&M Fan
Sorting Out OT BS Since 2005
Member since May 2005
128686 posts

re: Bregman earns National Shortstop of Year Award


No I'm not, Russian .. The Sam Houston State and UCLA games alone are proof positive that the guy has a ways to go on D in crunch time/post season .. ULL's run was on him too .. Nola, Lemahieu, Johnson, Larson, Reboulet didn't do that side saddle "OLE' " fielding crap with their gloves and commit silly errors on routine plays .. Come on .. The kid needs to step waaaay up on defense ..


This post was edited on 7/1 at 7:49 pm


Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top