Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Small PGs on the Decline in the Draft

Posted on 6/3/13 at 10:47 am
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 6/3/13 at 10:47 am
quote:

The early buzz on the small point guards in the 2013 NBA Draft class has not been good.

As teams begin working out players, some in head-to-head situations, the commentary flowing out on the smallest of the NBA Draft is not redeeming.

Trey Burke (6' 1.25? in shoes), who is considered by most to be the top point guard candidate, continues to get hammered by talent evaluators for being too slow for elite status at the next level. Burke is still likely to go in the top ten, but teams with pressing needs seem to be looking elsewhere and view Burke more as a solid backup than a franchise guard. Burke is expected to begin workouts soon and it’s possible he could sway some team’s opinions on him, but as teams really start to tear apart the draft Burke’s stock is taking a significant hit.

Dennis Schroeder (6' 2? in shoes) may not be the star in the making that some are projecting him, concerns about Schroeder’s shot and his slender frame have teams doubting that he can be an impact player worthy of a lottery pick. Schroeder has started working out for teams in hopes of cementing some guarantees. One league source said Schroeder is still a first round pick, but doubted that he could go in the teens where many have projected him.

Miami’s Shane Larkin (5' 11.5? in shoes) also has his detractors, mainly due to his size. The common complaint about Larkin is that he “plays small” and that’s a problem at the next level. Larkin logged some of the most impressive athletic stats at the NBA Draft Combine last month in Chicago and as he begins his workout tour he will need to prove to teams that he can play “big” and use some of those freakish athletic skills to overcome his size deficit.

On the flip side the lovefest over Syracuse guard Michael Carter-Williams continues to flourish. Talent evaluators continue to gush over Carter-Williams’ length and potential at the next level. The common comparison for Carter-Williams is Shaun Livingston before the knee injuries, which might be a little off considering Carter-Williams isn’t nearly the explosive athlete Livingston was coming into the NBA straight from high school.

LINK
Posted by jamal
Places Unknown
Member since Jan 2013
13219 posts
Posted on 6/3/13 at 10:49 am to
I want CJ Mocollum or Michael Carter Williams or Trey Burke or KCP.
Posted by MrBlue105
chillin with the BWC - anaconda
Member since Apr 2013
6602 posts
Posted on 6/3/13 at 10:50 am to
I agree with the evaluators. If you have a size problem, you need to make up for it in other ways. Burke doest have the speed to do that.
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27836 posts
Posted on 6/3/13 at 10:53 am to
But he has the jump shot and the handles.
Posted by jamal
Places Unknown
Member since Jan 2013
13219 posts
Posted on 6/3/13 at 10:54 am to
Burke is more quick than fast IMO.
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
36245 posts
Posted on 6/3/13 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Burke is more quick than fast IMO.


What about his motor?
Posted by jamal
Places Unknown
Member since Jan 2013
13219 posts
Posted on 6/3/13 at 11:09 am to
Posted by WhoDatPelican596
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2013
783 posts
Posted on 6/3/13 at 1:24 pm to
I think this all but confirms what everyone should already know about this. Dell wont want him. He just doesn't have what we are looking for at upgrading the point guard position
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
37269 posts
Posted on 6/3/13 at 2:33 pm to
Reminds me of a poor mans kemba walker
Posted by drake20
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
13156 posts
Posted on 6/3/13 at 6:18 pm to
I really like Mccollum....i'd take him over Burke.
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69035 posts
Posted on 6/3/13 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

Trey Burke (6' 1.25? in shoes), who is considered by most to be the top point guard candidate, continues to get hammered by talent evaluators for being too slow for elite status at the next level. Burke is still likely to go in the top ten, but teams with pressing needs seem to be looking elsewhere and view Burke more as a solid backup than a franchise guard. Burke is expected to begin workouts soon and it’s possible he could sway some team’s opinions on him, but as teams really start to tear apart the draft Burke’s stock is taking a significant hit.


Like most everyone else, I thought Burke looked great in the tournament, but we have to remember he was playing against kids. When reports started coming out of the combine, especially about his speed, he slipped in my estimation
Posted by WhoDatPelican596
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2013
783 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 3:38 pm to
Yup. Just not really worth drafting on this team
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84495 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 3:51 pm to
Call me old fashioned, but Burke is just a badass ball player. I like him a lot.
Posted by WhoDatPelican596
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2013
783 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 4:15 pm to
No defense. Plays very similar to Vasquez. But a little faster and alot smaller. No athleticism to make up for his lack of height so there really isn't even a chance we draft him unless dell completely flips his philosophy for this team
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram