Some updated regional projections after yesterday's games | Page 2 | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Broham
LSU Fan
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2005
14595 posts

re: Some updated regional projections after yesterday's games


You're fricking ULL, get over it.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
mglsu21
LSU Fan
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2012
667 posts

re: Some updated regional projections after yesterday's games


quote:

Still don't understand why tiger fans care so much about what a website calls our school


I just think that it is hilarious that ULL fans get all up in arms when ULM calls themselves UL or Louisiana. And ULM doing that is just as wrong as ULL doing it. It's just not accurate for either. Just funny that ULL does it but gets mad when ULM does it.

But I prefer to call ULL by their ever changing, very long name.....ULL SLI USL ragin' cajun phallic pepper bulldogs.






Back to top
lsuroadie
LSU Fan
South LA
Member since Oct 2007
5892 posts

re: Some updated regional projections after yesterday's games


quote:

Still don't understand why tiger fans care so much about what a website calls our school.


Still don't understand why ULL fans care so much what TDs calls your school







Back to top
  Replies (0)
BRLawyer
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Sep 2004
341 posts

re: Some updated regional projections after yesterday's games


quote:

So you ask LSU why we care? LSU just refers to ULL by its correct name.
My question is, why does ULL insist on using an inaccurate name?



Because of their terrible inferiority complex.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
theoldwiseone33
University of Louisiana
Member since May 2012
246 posts

re: Some updated regional projections after yesterday's games


No one is complaining about what ULM calls themselves. It really makes no difference to me.





Back to top
harry coleman beast
LSU Fan
Left Field
Member since Aug 2008
45394 posts

re: Some updated regional projections after yesterday's games


GTF with this bull shite. This aint the thread for it





Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top