When a player is clearly beat to goal and commits a hand check foul why doesn't | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Ignignot
LSU Fan
DooDoo Rooneys
Member since Mar 2009
11496 posts
 Online 

When a player is clearly beat to goal and commits a hand check foul why doesn't


Ref call more intentional fouls??






Back to top
Share:
heartbreakTiger
LSU Fan
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
118023 posts

re: When a player is clearly beat to goal and commits a hand check foul why doesn't


if hickey had done that then he would have been tossed from the game





Back to top
  Replies (0)
CerealKilla
SMU Fan
Das Boot
Member since Jan 2011
6098 posts

re: When a player is clearly beat to goal and commits a hand check foul why doesn't


In the NBA, there would have been 2 foul shots awarded.





Back to top
ralsu
LSU Fan
new orleans
Member since Jul 2009
2009 posts

re: When a player is clearly beat to goal and commits a hand check foul why doesn't


quote:

Ref call more intentional fouls??



That should have been a clear path foul 2 shoot & the ball






Back to top
Ignignot
LSU Fan
DooDoo Rooneys
Member since Mar 2009
11496 posts
 Online 

re: When a player is clearly beat to goal and commits a hand check foul why doesn't


Not just this game but alot of sec games it seems the same





Back to top
  Replies (0)
graychef
George Mason Fan
Broussard
Member since Jun 2008
17148 posts

re: When a player is clearly beat to goal and commits a hand check foul why doesn't


Yeah. Clear path foul.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
CarRamrod
USA Fan
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
34686 posts
 Online 

re: When a player is clearly beat to goal and commits a hand check foul why doesn't


Basketball reffing and rules are worse than having a board judge who has the best performance.

The fouling rules suck absolute dick. If the shooter jumps into someone, on purpose, and the defenders feed are not set, it is a foul on the defense. Thats complete bull shite.






Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top